UH Conservative Underground

Back for a visit to UHCU

2006-11-29T12:39:00.000-06:00

Man, I've been busy. But I've been proud that I went cold turkey in writing here. Haven't peaked until now. But I do miss it so.

I went to view my office the other day, and I was blown away with the view overlooking The Woodlands. Got the first of my bonus checks and promptly treated myself and gal to steak and shrimp at Kirby's. Almost got the rack of lamb, but the NY Strip called me.

As far as the election is concerned, I really wasn't that disheartened over the GOP loss. I would have thought that most Americans would have thought more about national security when going into the voting booth, not to mention that the people swallowed a bit too much liberal kool-aid that the media was dribbling their way, but the story has already been written.

Now it is the democrat party that has to show they can lead. The pressure is on the libs, and we have seen it with them backtracking on issues to keep them from looking totally leftists. The GOP has to use the next two years as a stepping stone back to its Conservative roots, and then they will regain their rightful power.

If the democrat party was to ever take back power, now was the time to yield it, because 2008 is the far more important election to determine if al-Qaeda truly wins or not. Right now al-Qaeda is in the emotional lead as we have seen with the democrat win. The Baker Report will probably broaden al-Qaeda's lead with their idiotic proposals.

Does anyone read history anymore? We tried negotiating with Hilter? It didn't work. Now we will try to negotiate with people whose will to kill Americans and Jews is as strong as an iron meteor on a collison course with Earth. Now tell me, how do we negotitate with that? Not even all the coordinated ohming and "Global Orgasm(s) For Peace" can stop that.

Time is closing in on us. The US will be getting their own suicide bombers soon enough. Hell, we got al-Qaeda and Taliban sympathizers all over UH, of which two were just picked up for training to kill Americans, and I'm sure that Carminati and the ACLU will be all over them in their defense, making the US out to be the bad guys.

If you got money invested, start moving it slowly to bonds, or some place it can be protected when the economy dips again. Get yourself a concealed weapons license, because when you hear someone in public chanting "Allah Akbar, Allah Akbar" while wearing winter clothes on a ninety degree day in the Galleria, you'd better have your gun drawn, cocked, and ready to shoot.

UH Liberal Haters Last Active Post

2006-11-07T00:10:00.000-06:00

Well, Election Day has come, and I promised that I would continue to post until today. Now I have to really prepare for my new job that starts after the end of the semester, but I will try and check the blog every now and then -- perhaps on weekends. I might make a post later on today or tomorrow, but no promises.

I've had a lot fun. A lot of liberals were frustrated, and it really felt good.

Liberals, be it known that your overrated lives were never endangered in reading this blog. UH liberals asses are so tight that if you shoved a lump of coal up any of their asses, they would shoot out a diamond in twelve hours. Don't you just love Ferris Bueller.

I hope that more UH Conservatives will take up the mantle and start their own UH Conservative blogs to continue to frustrate the liberals on campus. I would encourage you to stay anonymous -- write hard, and stick it to the liberals.

Turn the liberals words around on them in your arguments. Do your research and pose your words creatively and you will have a successful post and successful blog for that matter.

Post at least once a day during the semester. And most importantly, do not dwell on a post. Normally, I spend no more than twenty minutes on a post, but for the rest of you, don't spend more than 45 minutes on one. Re-read your material for an accurate presentation, and if you have to, read it again. And use fresh material.

Don't be afraid to piss off liberals. Write with a vengeance, but at the same time use as much humor as you possibly can. Humor is a key ingredent in an effective post, which is something that liberals hate, seeing as they cannot formulate any humor themselves.

This blog has had well over 50,000 hits, but it doesn't show due to a resetting hit counter every 15K or so. A hit counter is a good indicator to gauge if you are being read or not.

Anyway, good luck UH Conservatives. I'll be seeing you on the outside.

Screw the libs!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist David Salinas 'He Can't Find A Reason To Vote FOR Democrats' (He asks you to vote AGAINST Republicans)

2006-11-06T09:27:00.000-06:00

Let me ask you a question.

Quite simply. Do you really want people like David Mohammed Salinas in control of the US House or Senate?

Do you really want people like David Salinas in charge of securing our borders, controlling our armed forces, raising our taxes, allowing your minor children greater freedoms at securing abortions, and knocking down non-activist judges to our courts, etc. People the liberals laugh at stuff like this.

The democrats are nothing but a bunch of "Nero's" who want to squeeze every living dime out of you for the so-called "public good," and it does nothing but fatten the libs pockets.

Tomorrow, the United States will send a signal to the rest of the World, that we are either a bunch of mice or men. Tomorrow, we find out if al-Qaeda wins. Tomorrow, we will find out if there really is a God.

Folks, I really do care about our society. And to be honest. It really ain't that bad. We are being pounded with fear, rage and hatred day-in and day-out, and I'm tired of it. Coffee is going to kill you. The SUV is going to kill us. Bush is going to you. The oceans are going to die in a couple of years if democrats are not elected. It's really crazy.

Just think. When was the last time a polluted river like the Cuyahoga caught fire. We've come a long way since 1969. Our technology is better. We have cleaner burning fuels and engines, and yet we are still being scared to death by liberals. We have been sold a bill of goods that Houston is a dirty city and its air is dangerous. Poppycock.

Clinton, got all the credit for the economy in the 1990's, but yet, yet at present, President Bush has not received any acclaim for the lowest unemployment in history or Dow 12,000. The liberals refuse to recognize the achievements of the Bush Administration, but when you have a liberal President he would have been lauded in the liberal media.

In his tripe today "Republicans: learn, don't blame," Salinas, al-UH Daily Cougar columnist and resident cotton picker, makes his last thrust at helping the demcorats fool the UH electorate into completely voting democrat on November 7th.

Mohammed's assertions that the GOP has "done nothing positive" for this country is completely absurd. I don't know what Kool-Aid Salinas has been drinking, but he'd better get off the stuff now.

I mean look, David still believes that liberal Sen. John Kerry was actually trying to tell a joke when he insulted the troops. Then please tell me David Mohammed Salinas, what was the punchline? Kerry has not one funny bone in his body, and neither does Salinas.

Can you imagine being Salinas, and not to mention thinking the way he does. My God, the torture. He has to be a boy filled with an undying desire to control peoples lives. A hatred for those who do not feel the same way he does, and complete sympathy for the US' enemies.

I don't know what the hell Mohammed was talking about when he wrote that "President Bush and the Republican-led Congress have done nothing of note in the past two years." What the hell do you call confirming two excellent judges to the Supreme Court, solving the problem of detainee tribunals, approving more drilling to fight for our energy independence until we find alternative fuels that can compete with fossil fuels. You want me to go on.

The Bush tax cuts have put record revenues into government coffers and David Mohammed Salinas doesn't believe it.

Salinas defense of Kerry's stupid remarks is incorrigible. The record shows that Bush got higher grades throughout college than John F. Kerry, which Mohammed will not tell you. And not to mention that Kerry's Vietnam service was just a sham to come back to the US and denounce the war and Vietnam Veterans themselves as butchers. The Purple Hearts that Kerry garnered while in Vietnam have been called into question. Now tell me, what veteran you know has received combat wounds in faster succession than Kerry? No wonder he spent only a few months over in the RVN.

A safe world requires some sacrifice on part of the United States. For Christ's sake, we still have troops in Europe, Japan, Korea, and the Middle East following each of those conflicts. What makes you think that Iraq and Afghanistan will be any different.

By cutting and running from Iraq and Afghanistan, we leave the oil in Iraq at the mercy of the terrorists, and they can use that oil to buy weapons and technology. That money would not go to the Iraqi government to provide for the people but to recruit for al-Qaeda and its support to kill Americans in the future.

See democrats are only thinking forward enough to the next poll. That's how Clinton governed, and that's how democrats still think. President Bush on the other hand doesn't care about the polls, nor about the democrats who hate him. He's going to do what is right for America. Bush is thinking about a generation or two ahead, and historians will recognize him for that. After all, do you think President Lincoln was revered when he was President. And if someone says describe the Clinton Presidency in one word, you cannot help but think "sex" or "oral sex."

Salinas doesn't realize that we as a nation learn from mistakes. No one could have predicted how things would turn out after inital hostilities ceased. Things like troop levels and lightly armored Hummers are being corrected, but David Mohammed Salinas thinks that almightly government should have foreseen that and made adjustments beforehand.

Liberals are such sad people and Salinas is no different. He looks at the bad in people and comments. He doesn't look for the good.

We need to act fast in wartime, Salinas does not see that. Private contracts put things into motion and quickly at that. There are only one or two companies in the World that can what Halliburton does. And private contracts are nothing new to government. My God, I love watching the movie "The Aviator" in which Howard Hughes takes on a Senate Committee and wins.

To do what private contractors do, our military would have to be so large it would be hard to manage. And not to mention the military budget would be two, three, or four times larger than it is now. Private contractors allow the military to be flexible. The military doesn't have to move them from place to place. The contractors move themselves. The military just ensures that the mission is supported.

Mohammed regurgitates the liberal line that "Iraq is on the verge of a civil war." We have been hearing that liberal line for well over a year now. When in truth, only 3 or 4 provinces out of 18 in Iraq are experiencing activity that garners mention on our television, al la Americans dying on Iraqi roadsides via IEDs or being shot to death on CNN.

In time, the American role in Iraq will diminize until the Iraqi government request that they leave. David's proclamation that "it is time for Iraqis to control their own country." They are. And "oh, and listen to your own military and fire Donald Rumsfeld", which is a lie, because the Army Times Publishing Company is own by the Gannett Company (USA Today), and not by the US Military.

David Mohammed Salinas claim that "democrats will not raise taxes" is crazy.

"Democrats have endorsed payroll tax cuts, sales tax cuts and proposed raising the minimum wage and making college tuition tax deductible." Please. When has this ever been taken seriously on the democrats side?

Salinas again lies on the Bush tax cuts. They are really tax cuts. And President Bush has been fighting to make them permanent. That's why Salinas is calling them "a tax deferment."

Look, if Salinas goes off about the Bush tax cuts so adamantly, then why should he be believed about democrats wanting to endorse payroll tax cuts, and sales tax cuts.
No matter what the liberal poll numbers have said to depress GOP turnout. The People, "the True Poll," will vote tomorrow and set the record straight as to whether they want more Clintonesk style politics or Not. They'll vote to see if they want more CNN or Fox News, a stronger al-Qaeda or a weaker US Military. The People will vote to see if they want more liberal lies as opposed to the Truth, evil vs. Good, abortion vs. Life, dead embryos vs. Cord Blood & Adult Stem-Cells research.

The People will be voting for their lives.

Screw the Godless libs and leaning-dem Mods!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnists Forum Friday 'They're so optimistic on democrats winning' (Counting on Black voter support that is not there)

2006-11-03T10:19:00.000-06:00

"Want more illegals? Vote Democrat"

"Encourage Terrorists. Vote Democrat."

Those political signs really hit a home run in Fort Bend County before the liberals stole them. But no matter, the thought still lingers in the mind of Republicans and GOP leaning Independents.

The al-UH Daily Cougar columnists today posted their take on the upcoming election, and to put it mildly -- their crazy.

In the Forum Friday: Election time, al-UH Daily Cougar columnist and resident cotton picker David Mohammed Salinas predicts democrats will win everything. He supports illegals, and loves terrorists, so he's voting democrat big time.

Salinas assessment that Ben Cardin will win a Senate seat in Maryland is crazy, since even Black democrats voters are running away from the Plantation of Intellectual Slavery run by Maryland White liberals. And I believe that that is the vastly unspoken story of this election -- the Black vote, and how Black voters are tired of being taken advantage of by White liberals.

We know the terrorists are siding with the democrats. White hardcore liberals are siding with the democrats. But I'm not so sure that long time Black democrats are siding with the democrats this time as a whole. I just don't sense that.

Since the democrat party has been hijacked by the extreme left, the Blacks have not been pressed for participation, and if they were, we would be seeing it in the liberal media. They've seen how the liberals have went after the Hispanic vote which has turned out to be fruitless, and its to late to turn around and re-court the black vote in time for this election.

Many of those races that Salinas mentioned are close and as more people become more aware between now and election day the numbers will vastly narrow. When someone votes, they have to vote security of the family first, and we know that the Republicans are the only party that will secure this country. Cutting and running, or redeploying to Okinawa like the liberals want to do, is wrong and goes against everything that the liberals have ever stood for in promoting democracy around the world.

I think we will see some surprises in this election, with some long time democrats either losing or barely getting by in their election. Lynn Swann's Campaign for PA Governor will help Senator Rick Santorum whose has been down in the polls. Sen. Talent in MO has the facts on his side.

And to prove that democrats have been hyping their whole election facade UH Opinion columnist Jim McCormick is already maintaining that "foul play should be suspected if no change" is seen in leadership. This from the guy who promised UH readers a "sizzling summer series of tripe on the biting subject of stem cell research" back in 2005. And were still waiting.

Jim McCormick is confident that "the Republicans will make gains" but only when they "rig the computer voting machines in such a manner as to report a Republican victory regardless of what votes were actually cast." I guess he doesn't know about Sequoia Voting Systems, which is secretly controlled by Venezuelan anti-American dictator Hugo Chavez.

Do these stupid people even research anything before they write their tripe. Do they realize that Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Kennedy, etc. have been silent for the past two weeks, with John Kerry making a fool of himself after not getting the message to just shut-up. If the democrats really wanted to get their message out there, their leadership would be out there right across from President Bush at each of his campaign appearances.

Folks, the libs are riding the political rapids in a cardboard boat, and that boat is about to collapse.

I've warned McCormick to repeatedly stay out of writing about politics. He makes himself to look the fool each and everytime he tries it. He's great when he's writing about food, or about the problems he's having in the dorms, etc. But in politics he comes out looking and smelling the ass, because when you write, "if neither house changes party control, foul play should be suspected." You know who takes that to heart -- Blacks, and they don't vote because to them "what is the point."

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

Kerry Website Apology 'Shows Him NOT to be a REAL MAN' (More like a liberal eunuch)

2006-11-02T11:40:00.000-06:00

This statement comes from the website of the worthless Sen. John F. Kerry.

"November 1, 2006

Statement of Senator John Kerry

As a combat veteran, I want to make it clear to anyone in uniform and to their loved ones: my poorly stated joke at a rally was not about, and never intended to refer to any troop.

I sincerely regret that my words were misinterpreted to wrongly imply anything negative about those in uniform, and I personally apologize to any service member, family member, or American who was offended.

It is clear the Republican Party would rather talk about anything but their failed security policy. I don't want my verbal slip to be a diversion from the real issues. I will continue to fight for a change of course to provide real security for our country, and a winning strategy for our troops."

Folks, this is not a dead issue!!!

A REAL MAN would have spoken those words at a press conference. John Kerry is nothing more than a liberal eunuch.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Denise Hewitt 'Afraid Bush gains too much power w/ new Defense Act' (Who does she want declaring martial law -- the UN?)

2006-11-02T10:43:00.000-06:00

The last time I checked, Americans of 1878 didn't have to live in a post 9/11 world.

The President must be allowed to act quickly in this day and age. Lessons were definitely learned from September 11th and Hurricane Katrina. And it is obvious that liberal utopias who look to the federal teet for help when they scratch themselves, will now get that help, thus bypassing slow responding state and local governments.

Today, the Stalinist Denise Hewitt, the famed "Stalinist Squelcher of UH Liberal Speak." First off you twit, I in no way threatened your life. Second off, your not that important. How can you gather that I threatened your overrated life. Here's what I said. "About the only time I would agree with a "life" sentence in a murder case would be for the person who murders Denise E. Hewitt. That is equal punishment for the crime." I mean you showed compassion for convicted murders in your tripe, and yet when you perceive that you are threatened, you feel yourself to be in danger. Now how do you feel about those murder victims you blatantly ignored?

Now back to today's programming.

In her tripe today "Hidden provision a reason for concern," the al-UH Daily Cougar regurgitator of liberal professor crap columnist Denise E. Hewitt, is concerned that the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007, whiched the President signed recently, which provides for all things Defense, yet this year contains "a provision squished between a patent expansion for medals and hunting rights that essentially rescinds "posse comitatus" and grants the president extensive powers to declare martial law." Good.

Of course with Hewitt, and using my formula that if liberals are against an issue, it is good for America, it is easy to conclude that Hewitt loaths President Bush being given the extra power of declaring martial law when needed.

Hewitt sees "the language of the bill is too broad, leaving it up to the president to decide when to use federal troops to "restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States" in situations where natural disasters or insurrection result in disorder." My God is the liberal dense or what, or does she want the United Nations to get involved, thus being the sole authority to authorize the President to declare martial law.

Does every possible situation have to be spelled out before Denise will sign on to the law. I bet if a liberal President were in office, and Thank God one is not, then Hewitt would be lauding the new Presidential power.

Hewitt's defense of The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 is unpersuasive. The 1878 law "prevented federal forces from being used as tools of domestic law enforcement," and looking at those times, it was obvious that the South didn't want federal troops intervening in every little Southern disturbance. That was then Hewitt, and we must be allowed to change with the times.

Hewitt's argument against comitatus -- Kent State. Well Denise E. Hewitt, "the incident at Kent State on May 4, 1970, where National Guard troops killed four students" in no way compares to Hurricane Katrina. Just because some liberals got stupid and a few guardsmen had itchy trigger finger some 36 years-ago, doesn't mean that this law should not be welcomed.

Liberalism caused Kent State. Liberals were violent towards the ROTC at that campus. The libs fire-bombed their facilities as I recall from a documentary I saw a year or two ago, and there was no choice but to bring in the Guard.

Denise in the end contradicts her own statements when she writes "the difficulties of responding to Hurricane Katrina demonstrate situations where federal troops could have been critical in an effective response." Look, the the State of Louisiana was slow to react, and now with this law the issue is null.

Granted, infantrymen "aren't trained in police tactics," but Military Police are, and you know that they will be deployed as well when needed with the troops.

To the firm, school district, feminazi group, liberal group, department store, bar, massage parlor, or fast food restaurant that even considers hiring Denise E. Hewitt. You are getting a military hating, sadistic, Do As I Say (Not As I Do)" liberal. She will not be a team player, and will constantly undermine your authority.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Letters to Kristen Young 'Where is UH's Diversity?'

2006-11-01T20:52:00.000-06:00

Would someone please tell psychology junior Jillian Brenda Baginskie to please shut up with writing her letters to the editor. Either start your own UH Blog or run for the Student Senate. Complaining to the DC will not get you anywhere.

So far, the outstanding member from the 2002 Cinco Ranch Color Guard has written about UH's slow reaction to the recent floods, not enough food choice on campus, and equating the poor Black neighborhood surrounding UH with her fear of walking UH's parking lots at night.

Just what are you trying to say Jilly Girl? If Cinco Ranch were surrounded by UH, would you all of a sudden FEEL SAFE when walking to your car on campus in the dead of night?

My advice. Get yourself a concealed handgun permit and start packing on campus. I'd recommend a Kel-Tec 3AT (.380), which would fit in your hand bag with no problem. The handgun class can be taken in a morning and afternoon, and the background check and licensing procedure will take another two months, but it is worth it.

I would just ignore the university's stance on handgun possession on campus -- is it worth your life. Anyway, if you are licensed, I believe you would be responsible enough to carry a concealed weapon in a campus building and not brandish the weapon as to scare the living hell out of gun hating liberals.

See on campus, as long as your are licensed, you can carry anywhere on campus, except in a building having that sign. But hell, is the university going to escort you to your car each and every time when you are campus at night. No. Well, not unless you are willing to wait for various periods of time after having made tedious arrangements.

The problem with the University's weapons policy is that those poor criminals from that poor neighborhood you mentioned know that UH students don't carry on campus and are easy targets when walking in parking lots.

That's liberalism for you.

Idiotic Kerry Comments Ignored By Liberal Newspapers Again

2006-11-01T08:19:00.000-06:00

When the worthless Senator from Mass. John F. Kerry said the following the other day:

"You know, education, if you make the most of it and you study hard and you do your homework and you make an effort to be smart, you -- you can do well. If you don't, you get stuck in Iraq,"

you know good and goddamned well that Kerry did not mean those words for President Bush. Kerry's point to those kids at the rally was "vote democrat" or go to Iraq. He was talking to college students after all, and implied that the draft would be reinstated, etc.

The money bleeders at the al-Houston Chronicle reposted the al-Reuters story "Bush, Kerry clash over Iraq 'joke'" and you will be hard pressed to find it anywhere near the front page today. It's like on A-10.

That's another reason why you won't find me subscribing to that worthless tripe, and in six-months there will be another story of the Chronicle's circulation dropping another 3.6%. Folks, those libs at the Chronicle have been shooting themselves in the foot for years, and their starting to run low on blood.

As for the Al-DC, I sure somebody will be holding the water for this one just as they've done for the democrat party all these years. They'll swallowing Kerry's tripe hook line and sinker, and will further embarrass themselves in Kerry's defense.

When the liberal democrat leadership is MIA because of their stance on Iraq for the last few weeks of the campaign, someone at the DNC forgot to give Kerry his marching orders to "shut-up" on Iraq.

Do you think if the dems strategy on Iraq was working, that all of them wouldn't be out there stomping Bush and his Iraq policy into the ground. Please.

If anything, Kerry ruined his chance at another run for President in 2008 and some democrats he might have ruined 2006 as well. Liberal candidates are cancelling appearances with Kerry left and right, but our friends in the liberal media will do their best to cover it up.

One thing about this cover-up with Kerry, which can be seen in the Chronicle, the New York Times, and other liberal rags. This time, the people are really paying attention since we are less than a week out of the mid-terms. Those people, the ones that really don't pay attention until just a few weeks before the election are going to find out what's really going on.

They'll say, "honey, that Kerry story that was on the network news last night, did you find it in the Houston Chronicle this morning?" And thankfully a few more people will learn how they have been fooled all these years.

And to think I almost subscribed to the crappy Chronicle a few weeks ago.

Kerry has a long history of putting down our soldiers, from back in the early 70's when in front of Congress he proclaimed our soldiers were butchers, to recently when Kerry said our soldiers were terrorists to Iraqi women and children in the night, and now Kerry's tripe about our soldiers being uneducated.

Folks after this, if the democrats win -- it will be the doing of the Devil.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

Liberals Get Real Trick on Halloween 'Human Liver Grown in UK Laboratory' (CORD BLOOD, not embryonic stem cells used)

2006-10-31T13:05:00.000-06:00

-------------------------------------------
Dr Nico Forraz (left) and Prof Colin
McGuckin, (below) the tissue created in
the lab is actually the size of a 1p piece
-------------------------------------------

Bad new for liberals.

The UK Daily Mail is reporting that Newcastle University researchers "have grown the world's first artificial liver from stem cells in a breakthrough that will one day provide entire organs for transplant."

The 'mini-liver' is the "size of a one pence piece, will be developed to create a full-size functioning liver."

The liberal media here will probably report the success of the use of stem cells, but will not report which type, which was stem cells "taken from babies' umbilical cords" blood, "just a few minutes after birth."

Some new aspects for the mini liver, will involve testing new drugs, fewer testings on animal subjects, and in a matter of five to ten years can hopefully provide surgical uses for repairing livers, with the eventual hope of growing entire livers in the lab for transplant.

This is big news, and the liberals will ignore it because it doesn't fit their embryonic stem-cell template.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Colin Ferguson 'Thinks Osama Obama Should Be President' (I guess he watches Oprah)

2006-10-31T10:21:00.000-06:00

---------------------------------------------------
Super Barack is just a poser when it comes
to running for President
---------------------------------------------------

I guess if you have created a website that creates a "database online of all federal spending (including loans, various grants, contracts, and other financial assistance)," that now makes you acceptable to be President.

Folks, the man has done nothing and al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Colin K. Ferguson feels that Sen. Barack Obama is ready for the White House. Do Bill and Hillary Clinton know about this?

In his tripe today "Obama ready for White House," Colin Ferguson, UH's own Chicken Little, must be watching to much Oprah because that's where this whole thing started.

Obama made an angelic appearance on Oprah, and Oprah said she would support him for President, and next thing you know we have news stories all over the nation claiming that Obama is ready for the White House.

Obama talks a good game. Hell, Mario Cuomo is still living off his speech he made at the 1988 democratic convention, and he has done nothing. See folks, it's all talk. They do nothing, but they talk a good game. And even when they don't talk a good game, they still have the liberal media to sweep their mistakes under the rug.

Civil Rights leaders have talked a good game, but have they created any internal programs to help their peeps get ahead in life? No, they allow them to remain stupid so that they continue to vote democrat. Well, they know better now, and times are changing.

Colin calls Sen. Hillary Clinton "a solid leader and a strong woman to boot. However, she is uninspiring at best." Did he get clearance from the UH Young Democrats to write his tripe?

Ferguson proudly reports on Obama's rise to fame when "back in 2004, Obama was running for his current Illinois Senate seat when he made a name for himself at the Democratic National Convention by being the best speaker present." I'm looking at Obama as the first Black Mario Cuomo who has already gotten two years out of his speech, with only a website to show for it.

Obama said in his two year-old speech "we worship an awesome God in the blue states" but neglects to tell us that only 1-in-4 democrats believes in God, that "all of us pledg[e] allegiance to the stars and stripes," but they support removing God from that pledge, and all "of us defend[] the United States of America," while at the same time what to give the terrorists American Civil Rights.

Obama's a fraud people. Ferguson is looking for hope in democrats, but it is a false hope. My God, John Kerry, last night at Pasadena City College said that only dumb and uneducated soldiers go to Iraq. Who are they trying to kid?

Ferguson's wish that "Obama represents the Democratic Party as it wishes to be seen -- strong, caring, thoughtful, intelligent, sensible and otherwise worthy of the power we afford it." Hell, if he were that, he'd be a Republican.

To answer Colin's question "is America ready for a black president?" I say hell yeah!!

He just won't be a democrat.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

Democrat Leadership is Missing 'Using out of sight out of mind election strategy' (Hoping to steal back power Stalin Style)

2006-10-31T00:05:00.000-06:00

In the last weeks of this election you will have a hard time to find a quote out of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi or Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid. Why? And no, it's not because they are picking out new drapes for their prospective offices. It is because of their big mouths and their Stalinist plans for change in Washington, so they don't want to ruin it for the few democrats who do have a chance at winning next week.

Twelve years ago, Newt Gingrich and the Republican leadership was found all over television, and believe it or not -- they had a plan. It worked and they were elected.

Today, the democrats have a plan as well, a plan they won't tell you, unless of course they are elected. With the democrats, you don't get to test ride that new car, and like a communist society, you get what the state gives you. I say, no way.

I still maintain the polls are off, even after the pollsters have narrowed their polls to maintain credibility following the election.

Look, many people are going to cell phones as their main form of communication completely doing away with landlines going to their homes. My sister has done it already, as well as some friends, cousins, and even one of my elderly aunts. How can the pollsters be getting the complete picture of what America is thinking when an increasing portion of America is going off landline.

When was the last time you were polled by CNN, Fox, Zogby, etc? I've been an arbitron rater once, which is an every 40 year possibility, but I've never been polled by a major pollster, nor has anybody that I know. Where are these people found? I'm of the mind that a lot of the polls that we see are simply made up to suit the liberal medias template for making Republicans and President Bush look bad.

Honestly, I believe that America is fed up with the liberal media, and we have seen signs, such as Dan Rather's firing, liberal newspaper circulations plummetting, and GOP candidates doing well in typically liberal states.

The Conservative Media of Radio and TV Talk Show Host as well as Conservative Bloggers, are doing extremely well. They do set the record straight, and let the liberals to stew in their own juices. Thankfully, Blacks slowly en masse are realizing that supporting democrats has gotten them no where, and a good number will either stay home in protest or actually try and vote Republican for the first time in their lives.

The Soros dominated democrats have no respect for the Black Community. They allow the Blacks to roam the countryside until ten days before election when they are all rounded up and herded to the polls. To the MoveOn.orgers, Blacks are only good for a democrat vote, and nothing else.

I don't think Americans are actually believing what the liberal media is saying. I mean the ACLU dropped their Patriot Act challenge, and most Americans are not stupid enough to believe that the government is actually listening and recording them. Mrs. Cheney was right, they are listening for terrorists phone calls, and nothing else. Besides the storage space and processing technology, not to mention the millions of analyst needed would make it a failing enterprise. Concentrate on terrorists phone calls, and you've got yourself a program.

If the United States is fooled into allowing the democrats into power, then we deserve we get as a nation. Because you know the liberals will be more fair to al-Qaeda than to our own military, and taxpayers, and the next you know, we will have our own Pompeii.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'Houston Chronicle Experiences More Chronarrhea' (Circulation down another 3.6%)

2006-10-30T13:32:00.000-06:00

I always enjoy these posts.

Editor and Publisher is reporting on the new newspaper circulation numbers as of September 2006, and the old standard Houston Chronicle took another hit with its circulation down another 3.6% to 508,097. Since March 2005, the Chronicle has lost 17.4 percent of their circulation, and you can be assured that they don't blame their journalism as being the problem. You are the problem for not buying their tripe.

I vow not to support the Houston Chronicle until it is sold to a Conservative outfit or closes. Someone almost convinced me the other month to subscribe, but in the end I said, "I'm sorry, I cannot support liberalism," and walked away.

The San Fransisco Chronicle lost another 5.3%.

No word yet if the Houston Chronicle will be laying off any of its Black, Hispanic, and probably even Asian workers, but as we all know that those layoffs won't effect the Chronicle's liberal journalism.

One day, the libs at the Chronicle will have to stop believing that Houstonians are totally stupid. That day will be when they realize that slanted liberal journalism does not work.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist David Salinas 'Now Its Racist for White Girls to Wink At Handsome Black Men' (Fearlessly writes N-Word multiple times)

2006-10-30T09:30:00.000-06:00

Racism is constantly being redefined everyday, and now it's considered racist for an attractive white girl to wink at a handsome Black man, and say "call me," at least in a GOP political commercial.

Today al-UH Daily Cougar columnist and resident cotton picker David Mohammed Salinas is doing his last minute part to try and confuse the UH electorate into completely voting democrat on November 7th. He's doing the best can -- by lying to you.

In his tripe today "Ad campaigns focus on race," Salinas plays "on fears rooted in racial bias to garner those last few votes." He quotes the N-word four times, which to me is a direct insult to the UH Black Community.

He only reports on so-called GOP discrimination, never mentioning anything dem, which are really to numerous to mention.

The GOP ad on Harold Ford, which was funny and addressed the issues that people are interested in, and spelled out that Ford is truly a 'liberal.' Now Ford is out there claiming to be 'God-fearing' and 'gun-loving,' all the things that democrats truly stand for, yeah right. And get this, Ford is out there claiming that Democrats "love the Lord" more than the GOP. And not to mention Ford is out there crashing his opponent Bob Corker's camapign appearances, such as was seen in the "Memphis Meltdown.'

There is a lot of sick stuff out there, like that MJ Fox never even read Amendment 2 before he did that stupid stem-cell ad in Missouri. Salinas will never tell you anything about that.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

Lynne Cheney Tears CNN's Wolf Blitzer A New Asshole for running Terrorists Propaganda

2006-10-30T07:29:00.000-06:00

I've ate so much steak over the past few days, I'm not going to eat it for a month. Sunday afternoon, I even had an anti-war lib cousin over at the Northern Command. I insisted she table all her talk of politics until after dinner, since everyone was there to party.

She held her fire until after desert. She knows my history and what I stand for, and after dinner a small group of us retired to my study with a bottle of wine.

Of course I got the liberal line from my cousin about how we should redeploy, or just plain withdraw from Iraq, and that it was a mistake, and not to mention that it would be better if Saddam were back in power.

I really didn't want to argue with my cousin about the war so I proposed an analogy. I said to my cousin. "Imagine you live in a beautiful utopian community, on the beautiful seaside with gorgeous mountains to your rear. Unless your a worker, you haven't a care in this liberal utopia, since everything is done for you."

"Then one day, the ground starts to rumble. No worries. It's happens occassionally. Live goes on as normal. A week, month, maybe a year or two, and the ground starts to rumble again. Again, no worries although some buildings are damaged, one or two are killed, but again, live goes on as normal in this liberal utopia. The workers are there to clean up the mess."

"Then one day a few years later, the ground again rumbles the hardest its ever rumbled before, and this time the mountain behind the liberal utopia starts to smoke and send soil into the air. Again some buildings are damaged, several hundred are killed, but initial worries soon fade, and life returns to normal. The workers again clean up the ash and the mess."

"Then one day a few months later, the mountain really blows its top, again with earthquakes. Ash is spit into the air the farthest its ever gone up, the earthquakes are getting stronger. No one knows what's going on, but they know that the workers will clean it up when it passes. But the mountain doesn't quit, the earthquakes don't quit, and just when the liberals begin to take action against the mountain, by leaving their utopia, the mountain really blows its top and sends a pyroclastic flow of deadly material into the town killing everyone and burning everything for 1,600 years."

"My dear cousin, when it is to late for liberals to take action against our mountain (the terrorists), that is when we, the US, will have our own Pompeii (in the form of a nuclear bomb or dirty bomb.")

Liberalism kills in so many forms, such as abortion, euthanasia, cutting and running from military situations resulting in the genocide of millions by the victors, taking inaction with UN Resolutions which allow dictators to kill their own citizens.

----------------------------------------------------

The NewsBusters Posting Lynne Cheney Blasts CNN: 'Why Are You Running Terrorist Propaganda?' tells it all. I'm growing more prouder of Mrs. Cheney, The First Lady, VP Cheney, and The President all the time. They are telling it like it is, calling the libs on their assertions, and not accepting the libs premise in their questioning.

CNN might as well be the TPNN (Terrorist Propaganda News Network). In a recent interview of Lynne Cheney by TPNN anchor Wolf Blitzer, Mrs. Cheney accused Blitzer of airing terrorist propaganda, which involved TPNN airing a tape solely provided by terrorists in Iraq killing American soldiers.

In the interview, Mrs. Cheney cornered Blitzer about CNN running the terrorist propaganda tape which involved shooting American soldiers, and "bluntly asked if Blitzer wanted the U.S. to win in Iraq."

Great move Mrs. Cheney. Blitzer was running scared. Incredibly, the liberal media is on the run. Their patriotism is being challenged, and Mrs. Cheney won the day.

Blitzer's answer to Mrs. Cheney's blunt question was "the answer, of course, is we want the United States to win. We are Americans. There's no doubt about it. You think we want terrorists to win?" But it didn't sound sincere to me. It sounded like a man perplexed, wanting to quickly move on to to the originial intention of the interview, which was Mrs. Cheney's book.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

How Come The Liberal Media Doesn't Report More of This? (We are winning people, and the liberal media wants you to believe Iraq is in Civil War)

2006-10-29T06:10:00.000-06:00

When I see something like this. I know what we are doing in Iraq is worth it. Our soldiers are fighting for themselves, their buddies, that little kid being hugged. And all liberals can do is verbally "spit" in our soldiers faces.

Liberals would have you believe that Karl Rove set up this moment.

How Would a Liberal Senator Webb Write Legislation? (Given that Webb Says His Novels are 'Inappropriate' for even News Radio to read 'on air')

2006-10-28T00:45:00.000-05:00

I got a lot of amusement out of hearing the surfacing information about liberal Virginia Senatorial Candidate and Porn Author, Jim Webb, and the novels that he has written that are really demeaning to women and children.

I mean the stuff is so explicit, that Webb himself said that his novels are 'inappropriate' for News Radio or even Talk Radio to repeat on the air. Were talking Fathers having oral sex with sons, and strippers slicing bananas with their v******, you get the picture. How the hell Webb couldn't think that his porn style of writing would not become an issue in the campaign is mindboggling to me. Let me guess, Karl Rove made Webb think and write that crap by using mind control.

With all that, it got me to thinking. How would Webb, if elected to the Senate, write his legislation in the Senate? So I picked out some old legislation, changed a few names, and thought Webb slutty.

-----------------------------------------------------------

SJ 39 IS

109th CONGRESS

2d Session

S. J. RES. 39

To spur a political solution in Iraq and encourage the people of Iraq to provide for their own security through the redeployment of the United States military forces.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

June 6, 2006

Mr. WEBB introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

JOINT RESOLUTION

To spur a political solution in Iraq and encourage the people of Iraq to provide for their own security through the redeployment of the United States military forces.

Whereas the United States military forces have served bravely in Iraq and deserve the heartfelt support of the United States;

Whereas Mrs. Boxer has the hots for Mrs. Clinton, and Mrs. Boxer would enjoy passing her tongue over and into Mrs. CLINTON's "honey pot," unleashing Mrs. Clinton's body into a hail of quivers;

Whereas Mrs. Boxer and Mrs. Clinton, would request private sessions with Mr. Kennedy and Mr. Dodd to recreate the famous Kennedy/Dodd "waitress sandwich" with Mrs. Boxer and Mrs. Clinton each taking their turn as the "waitress";

Whereas Mr. Webb, would request weekly oral servicings on the Senate Floor from Ms. Landrieu, with full rights to fully disrobe Ms. Landrieu, and demand she slice Mr. Webb's banana into several pieces with her "ax wound" while in the split position and having Ms. Landrieu's breasts shine brightly in the Senate Chamber lights;

Whereas more than 200 coalition personnel have been killed in support of military operations in Iraq;

Whereas, according to a January 2006 poll, 64 percent of Iraqis believe that crime and violent attacks will decrease when the United States redeploys from Iraq, 67 percent of Iraqis believe that their day-to-day security will increase if the United States redeploys from Iraq, and 73 percent of Iraqis believe that there will be greater cooperation among the political factions of Iraq when the United States redeploys from Iraq: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That--

(1) United States military forces in Iraq are to be redeployed from Iraq by December 31, 2006, or earlier if practicable;

(2) nothing in this resolution prohibits the use of United States military forces from training Iraqi security forces in the region outside of Iraq; and

(3) nothing in this resolution prohibits the use of United States military forces based outside of Iraq to--

(A) conduct targeted and specialized counter-terrorism missions in Iraq; and

(B) protect military and civilian personnel of the United States in Iraq.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Now that would be some "HOT" legislation.

Uh, pardon me. But didn't the liberal media predict that St. Louis Cardinals were going to be smashed by the NY Mets in the NLCS. Well, they just beat the Detroit Tigers to win The World Series.

I can't quite place what the liberal media will be wrong with next, but I'm sure that it will come to me by the morning of November 8th.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Handles Liberal Senator Reid Scandals with Kid Gloves

2006-10-27T12:55:00.000-05:00

You gotta to give Kristen Young some credit for running at least something on liberal Senator Harry Reid's land scandal and illegal use of campaign funds. She's trying. Hell, she's lost some weight, and looks a lot better from her pictures of old.

Today's Friday Forum, "What do you think of Harry Reid's use of funding?," was an almost half-way fair and balanced considering liberal Senator Harry Reid is a democrat and we are less than two weeks away from the mid-term elections.

But since it ran on a Friday when the UH student population is at its lowest all week, you get the feeling that the libs in the leftist Communications building can say "see were are fair and balanced," while at the same time giving a wink-and-nod to the UH Young Democrats.

We all know that liberals are getting way to many "free rides" in the liberal media, and it shows. I mean, My God, the NY Times profits were down 39% the last time I checked. Lib media outlets all over the country are losing money, laying off liberals, and desperately trying not to follow the "Fox News Channel business model."

Incredibly, ABC News political director Mark Halperin, a liberal, in his recent book "The Way To Win" conceded that Conservatives know all to well not to trust the liberal media, and its time to get their trust back if the lib media is going to survive by adopting something close to the Fox model.

In the Al-DC's teaser today, it appears that liberal Senate Minority Leader Reid does really get a pass seeing as the accusations appear so tame. The "$3,300 from campaign funds to give bonuses to the staff at his residence," was an illegal act, and even his shady land deal was brushed off as "who hasn't bought a $1 million-plus worth of land and then shifted the title in mysterious ways" when you know that if Reid were a Republican he'd been in the headlines everyday.

Young tried her best to put half for and half against Reid. Isaiah Warner was pretty hard on Reid, calling for his removal from the Senate and the democrat party. Zach Lee condemned Reid, but didn't call for his resignation or removal from being leader. Christian Palmer and Jude Maydwell cheered Reid on. Jordan Overturf blamed Republicans for the scandal, and that Reid's misdoings aren't "a big deal". But Jordan will be there calling for impeachment if the libs win in November.

I do take satisfaction, schadenfreude in fact, that if any of these people are looking for employment in the liberal media once they graduate, they will be working at the local Burger King, rewriting the menu.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

Al-NYT: Democrats See Black Turnout as a Challenge

2006-10-27T00:01:00.000-05:00

-------------------------------------
VA Liberal Senatorial Candidate
and Porn Author, Jim Webb, meeting
with very enthusiastic Black Voters
(Photo: The Virginian-Pilot)
-------------------------------------

Just back from a nice celebratory steak dinner with a couple of buds and a cousin of mine for the big news today. What's $450 plus for some steaks and beers when you're having fun. Will probably drop another $600 before the end of the weekend with family. And you know who, we got a lot laughs off of you.

When I got back to my place and relaxed a bit, I ran across this New York Times story for Friday "Democrats See Black Turnout as a Challenge," which echoed my thoughts about how Blacks are not as enthusiastic about voting this time for democrats, and well, I felt compelled to make a post.

I'm of the thought that Blacks are tired of being "herded" like sheep to the democrat feeding trough just before the election. For instance, the NYT pointed out that Virginia liberal Jim Webb, who is running against Sen. George Allen, and of course, the liberal "crammed in visits to 12 Black churches, and for several weeks he has been pumping money into advertisements on Black radio stations and in Black newspapers." In effect, the herding has begun.

Missouri liberal Claire McCaskill, who is caught up in the middle of the Michael J Fox disaster, is trying to fool Blacks with ads on sickle cell anemia, and how embryonic stem-cell research can cure afflicted Black people with sickle cell, but Blacks will only be cured if the liberal is elected.

I've maintained for weeks that Black voter turnout is vital in this election, and that democrats have continued to ignore their Black base, something that nobody has been talking about.

"There are worries among Democratic strategists in some states that Blacks may not turn up at the polls in big enough numbers because of disillusionment over past shenanigans." Not GOP, but democrat shenanigans because you know if it were GOP they would have said so.

The Pew Research Center found that Black disenchantment in the voting system has nearly doubled since 2004 to 29%. Not to mention that 16% of Blacks voted GOP in 2004. Larry X included, and I'm sure alot more of his buds will be voting GOP this year.

Nearly 30% of Blacks do not see their votes being counted accurately, but in Black voting areas like New Orleans, liberals run the show. Again, if the GOP were responsible for miscounting Black votes, then the GOP would have been blamed.

The NYT says that "voting experts say the disillusionment is the cumulative effect of election problems in 2000 and 2004, and a reaction to new identification and voter registration laws. Long lines and shortages of poll workers in lower-income neighborhoods in the 2004 election and widespread reports of fliers with misinformation appearing in minority areas have also had a corrosive effect on confidence." That is pure bullcrap.

The democrat party has been hijacked by the very extreme leftist George Soros-type groups and Howard Dean, and Blacks have simply been left out in the cold. It was afterall Howard Dean who said, "I hate the Republicans and everything they stand for" in a long ago meeting with the DNC Black Caucus, "you think the Republican National Committee could get this many people of color in a single room? Only if they had the hotel staff in here."

I believe Blacks know they have been hijacked, and come November 8th, they will be the "big story," about how the liberals lost the election, again. I still maintain that if the democrat party wins the House, I will close this blog immediately, not that it will eventually be closed anyway.

I'm not convinced that democrats, at least the ones with some common sense, are that excited about voting dem this year. I mean Black GOP candidates, especially Michael Steele in MD, actually has a real chance in a heavily democrat state, where the Black democrat primary candidate, former NAACP president Kweisi Mfume lost to a white guy, Ben Cardin.

"Recent polls have found record levels of outrage from Democrats about the current political leadership, which may offset the effect of Black disillusion." But as I've pointed out before, the polls, if you look closely between the lines, are most of the time heavily overweighted with democrats.

Well, it is late, and I've got to get my night-table reading out of the way.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Jeff Cokenour 'Props Up Michael J Fox ad' (Liberals lie to sick people with false hope for sick in those Political Ads)

2006-10-26T16:40:00.000-05:00

I nailed the interview. I got the job I wanted with the firm I wanted, and this evening I will be sending out my "Thanks, but no thanks" letters in reference to the offers I've already received. That also means pretty soon I will have to stop posting on this blog. I've got a lot of things to do, but I will try and post at least once a day until Election Day. After that, I will play it by ear, seeing as I already started my post-UH blog with my real name of all things.

I've really enjoyed my time here at UH. It's been fun sparing with the sane people among you. As for the crazy people, and they know who they are, they might miss me even more because there won't be anybody for them to be angry at on campus.

-----------------------------------------------

Did you know that if John Kerry were elected President that Christopher Reeve would be walking today, and that if the democrats win it all in November that Michael J. Fox's Parkinson's Disease will suddenly be reversed?

The liberals are lying to sick people folks, and Michael J. Fox knows he's lying. And the al-UH Daily Cougar has to go all the way down the coast to get UH-Victoria biology junior Jeff Cokenour to comment on it, since none of our own liberals can spell biology much less understand it.

Cokenour obviously sides with MJ Fox on this issue. Evidently the diseased and disabled, especially the celebrity diseased and disabled can say anything that they want in the political arena and not expect to be challenged. Isn't it incredible that all the other issues like Iraq, the economy, Foley, gas prices, have fallen by the wayside. Now stem-cell research is the latest October surprise, and I think that people will not be fooled by the libs and MJ Fox.

This whole thing boils down to money, cloning, and how can the liberal sacrament of abortion be prolonged.

In his tripe today "Human cloning not research avenue," Jeff Cokenour starts with "in the state of Missouri, certain people are trying to manipulate a sick man -- Michael J. Fox -- for their own ends by saying that a new ballot measure scheduled for the November 2006 election would ban stem-cell research." My God, these people are desperate.

Stem-cell research is already legal in Missouri. The major issue here is cloning as well as federally funded clinics being able to pay money to poor women for their eggs. And the implication that Republicans don't want to see Michael J. Fox get well is crazy.

But looking at reality, it looks more like Fox is playing the public, seeing as when he is on TV shows like Boston Legal he takes the right amount of medication, and when he appears in front of Congress or in his political TV commercials, he doesn't take his medication or doesn't take the right amount of medication his symptoms are readily shown. Now Fox has admitted that in his book and in interviews to not taking his meds properly to play on people's sympathy, but what Fox is saying is like Algore saying that "Republicans want dirty air and water."

It's absolute poppycock what the liberals are saying.

The Missouri Constitutional Amendment 2 is really backwards. The wording sounds good:

"This amendment will allow Missouri patients and researchers access to any method of stem-cell research, therapies and cures permitted under federal law. It also will set limits on any stem-cell research, therapies and cures, including banning human cloning or attempted cloning. Violators will be subject to criminal and civil penalties."

And if you vote FOR you are actually voting for CLONING. Read it for yourself, I'm not trying to hide anything. I've always maintained that if the democrats are FOR an issue, then it's bad for America. Well, the liberals are FOR it, and the voters of Missouri are more than likely going to be AGAINST it Thank God.

Cokenour maintains that "the proposed Missouri law would ban all human cloning efforts and guarantee legal protection for the type of stem-cell research allowed by the federal government." That's not true. The amendment wording for cloning actually reads "no person may clone or attempt to clone a human being". No one will attempt to clone a human being, but the Missouri Amendment leaves the door open for everything else including human body parts, sheep, and cloning embryos for their destruction, etc.

Cokenour being a biology major will not tell you currently "72 maladies for which human patients have received some benefit," that from the Weekly Standard, but absolutely nothing has been proved with embryonic stem cells,and you can check that out in the MD Anderson Library by reviewing the medical journals.

Adult stem cell treatments are working, you can receive them, while you won't see the same for embryonic stem-cells. Stem-cell research is going on at the state level, but the liberals really want federal funding for embryonic research.

"As one who hopes to be a physician in the future, I want all disease and illness be cured and that everyone, regardless of race or creed, be able to live a healthy, normal life," Jeff said.

Look, I've stated facts to counter Cokenour's game. Hell, I've got several family members dying of inoperable cancers right now, and I'd take any treatment for them to get better, but embryonic stem-cell research isn't panning out. Adult stem-cells are working, and to not even mention such treatments borderlines on quackery.

Jeff ought to be ashamed to have written it if he is such an esteemed writer. But if he can't be honest with the tripe he set forth in his piece today, how the hell is Jeff Cokenour going to be honest with his future patients.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

NOW Bitches: Happy Love Your Body Day! on October 18th (It was so momentous that I forgot)

2006-10-24T13:11:00.000-05:00

This came in the e-mail last week from the NAGs about their Happy Love Your Body Day! It read:

Take a moment today, October 18, to honor yourself and love your body, just as it is.

Carry that spirit with you throughout the year, as you love your body every day!

Today marks the ninth annual Love Your Body Day, a day of action in our year-long Love Your Body Campaign. In response to unhealthy and exploitive images of women in the media, NOW Foundation established the Love Your Body Campaign to promote positive, healthy images of women and girls, protest harmful and offensive advertisements, and raise awareness about women's health issues.

Here are some suggestions for actions you can take this month, or any time!

Organize a picket or start a petition drive to tell advertisers that their ads are offensive to women and create unhealthy expectations. Check out the "bad ads" and the good ads as well!
Create T-shirts with messages that uplift body-esteem like: "My Sum Is Greater Than My Parts," "I am Not my Hair," "Real Women have Curves," and of course "Love Your Body."
Host a forum on women's health issues. Get the facts!
Hold a LYBD fashion show! Whether you're styling in cultural dress, after-five attire, or weekend garb, embrace women's lovely shapes and shades.
Local eateries not meeting your standards? Stuff the suggestion box with suggestions for better food choices.
Organize a rally to create awareness of body image issues. Have a festival—with good music, good food, free services and information!
Send a Love Your Body e-card.
If you are pregnant, abort your fetus.

More action ideas are available on the Love Your Body website!

According to the National Eating Disorders Association (NEDA) 80 percent of women express dissatisfaction with their appearance. Help reverse the trend and take action today!

Help remind yourself to love your body every day with our 2007 Calendar, featuring art of dead fetuses submitted in the Love Your Body Poster Contest. Buy one today, and share it with someone you love! Perfect for a girl in your life.

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Denise Hewitt 'Free Speech in Her Tripe Today' (DC Insider reports Hewitt is a "Do As I Say (Not As I Do)" liberal)

2006-10-23T22:25:00.000-05:00

I wasn't going to post this evening. Maybe check the comments, and respond quickly. But then I decided to take another look at the al-UH Daily Cougar on my desk before I tossed it in its rightful home -- the trash can.

Low and behold, guess what. I found a piece that I earlier overlooked because of the hours free time that I have to post on this blog as proclaimed by the UH Slavedriver. It was a piece by al-UH Daily Cougar regurgitator of liberal professor crap columnist Denise E. Hewitt, and guess what, she's talking of Free Speech.

In her tripe today "Freedom not granted without costs," Hewitt goes on about the freedom of speech and how "it allows us to speak out" and make our ordinary citizens voices be projected across the countryside.

I won't delve too much into her tripe today, but generally, everyone gets a chance to speak no matter their views and those voices should not be hindered. For instance, Hewitt made the point that the KKK has the right to meet peacefully on park lands, etc. But as we will come to find out that when Denise E. Hewitt is cornered in her arguments, she will become a Stalinist and force an end to free speech.

Now, let's go back to October 5th and my post "Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Denise Hewitt 'Attacking Wal-Mart on Order from the Young Democrats at UH' (I'm buying more Wal-Mart stock)," when I shredded Hewitt like a head of lettuce in countering her anti-Wal-Mart campaign.

In steps The DC Insider with interesting information about Denise's reaction to my post. To mildly say, Hewitt was pissed, and I was warned by the DCI that Denise was finally onto me and that I "better watch out!." Well I almost shit my pants cowering in fear for the blitzkrieg of Feminazi crap that I would soon endure from Hewitt. None came.

So what did Hewitt do. Well, the DCI reports that Denise went to her liberal friend focus group. "She posted a thread kind of laughing it off in a private forum. She posted a link to her op-ed and then your article."

Hewitt "thought she'd be backed up by her liberal friends. Well it turned out that her liberal friends weren't quite as ultra-far left and looney as she is. They actually challenged her stance and she couldn't take the heat."

Then folks, the Great Defender of Free Speech Denise E. Hewitt, "then requested the moderator lock the thread." Yep, that makes Hewitt look like a "Do As I Say (Not As I Do)" liberal to me.

Yes, the Stalinist Denise Hewitt silenced the opposition "just like the Columbia students" did when they didn't like what they heard.

The DC Insider went on to say that "free speech is only allowed by ultra-libs when it's their speech or agrees with their stance 100%. I'm suprised she didn't learn earlier. [Hewitt] used to post (in the private forum) her forthcoming op-eds in full prior to them being published. She received such little praise and too much "constructive" criticism that she just stopped posting them."

Many thanks to the The DC Insider for those juicy tidbits of information about the Stalinist Denise Hewitt. It spells volumes about this liberal, and liberalism in general.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist David Salinas 'Bipartisanship best for US' (But it only works when Republicans agree with democrats)

2006-10-23T09:13:00.000-05:00

I've always thought about bipartisanship as a one-way street for democrats. Yes, they will stand behind President Bush at the beginning of the war, but when it drags and a few Americans die compared to other American campaigns, the libs jump off the wagon as soon as they can and support the enemy with their rhetoric.

As for liberals, bipartisan is Republicans agreeing with democrats, and that's it. Republicans have been fooled by the word -- bipartisan -- for the longest time now, especially when the Republicans controlled the Senate and still liberal Tom Daschle was the defacto head of that body thanks to GOP bipartisanship.

So today, we find al-UH Daily Cougar columnist and resident cotton picker David Mohammed Salinas might actually be thinking in the back of his mind what I believe most Americans will be thinking now that early voting has begun. "Which political party will best protect my family from the threat of terrorism?" Honest to God who cannot be fooled, it will be the Republicans that people will have to choose.

In his tripe today "Bipartisan policies best for U.S.," Salinas feeds us his code-word "bipartisan" which sets the democrats up for still another loss this November. Mohammed writes that "the Republican Party will not lose this mid-term election," but he makes up for it to his lib friends on UH by stating that "Republicans may lose control of the House of Representatives and maybe even the Senate," but America stoop to that level of stupidity. We'll soon find out.

I certainly don't believe that if the "democrats win this election cycle, it is not a death knell for Republican and conservative ideals, but it would mark the end of the Karl Rove-George Bush-Rush Limbaugh style of politics." Please. My God, the liberals are still trying to destroy the President, who cannot run for office anymore, and by 2008 will not have any ammunition for his GOP successor. Rush Limbaugh has never based his success on who wins elections, and even with the GOP in power, he is still No. 1.

Liberals have been setting themselves up for defeat for a couple of months now. Little stories hear and there about election machine faults and other things have been popping up all over the place. CNN had a stupid show about Broken Government this weekend and gave the impression that the US elections could not held fairly. Poppycock.

I'm of the impression that democrats actually want to lose this year and stake everything on 2008. They've purposely not paid any attention to their Black base, yet we hear stories of how Barrack Obama will be the democrats savior in 2008. Even Oprah is backing Obama instead of Hillary because of all the baggage Clinton maintains. Hell, looking at the democrat record of following Black dem leaders, Obama will be the next fall guy.

Mohammed speaks of another code-word -- common good -- which again means that Republicans have to yield to democrat ideals in order for the country to advance. Ex-President Clinton used all those code words in a recent speech. If the democrats were confident about the election, we wouldn't be hearing any of the code-words, but only strong words such as "winning back power."

I haven't seen one enthusiastic liberal about the election, and certainly Mohammed isn't enthusiatic or he wouldn't be talking bipartisanship today in his tripe.

Rush Limbaugh gave his listeners a great analogy about the liberal media spin on the elections and how they will perform. "They're thinking they are going to win, but they've spike the ball on the 10 yard line." They prematurely ejaculated their October Surprise, Foley, and the GOP electorate has become all to aware of their dirty tricks. Not to mention that the polls they conduct are outweighed with democrats, sometimes by as much as 24%. It's really a deliberate effort to suppress GOP voters, and quitely simply, I don't think its working.

I'm glad that Salinas brought up the Second Tier President Ronald Reagan, and how he worked with democrats. But that was then. The democrats are a whole new ballgame nowadays. They literally cannot be reasoned with. Just like the terrorists, when the terrorists start off negotiations by demanding your Jewish and American deaths, where else do you go from that?

Bush initially had comparisons to Reagan because he worked well with democrats as Texas Governor, and he did real good as Texas Governor, and he is still doing good, but I still have my disagreements with Bush in certain areas like illegal immigration and what have you. But I still support the President.

Back in the days of Tip O'Neill, the democrats had a "plan" to counter the Republicans plan. Now they don't. Back in the days of Tip O'Neill, the democrats weren't held hostage as they are today by the extreme left wing of the party.

Fourth Tier President Clinton had to play with the Republicans to stay in office, and he got none of the major reforms he wanted such as national healthcare, etc. But unfortunately we had to still be forced to endure the Monica Lewinsky ordeal.

Salinas chides Bush for spending and record deficits, but he in no way accounts for September 11th and the war in his blame. In fact, unemployment is now even less than it was under Reagan and Clinton, and recent government revenues thanks to the Bush Tax Cuts have put more money into government cofers than ever before, and still the democrats complain.

Mohammed even attacks Rush Limbaugh for calling "democrats and liberals 'anti-American.'" Well they are. He even criticizes Rush for dropping "out of college his freshman year and avoided Vietnam because of a cyst, he did have a distinct talent to talk." Yet Salinas probably praises Al Franken and Air America for the ability to talk, and don't forget they just went broke. Being a war veteran myself, I have no problem with people who did not serve the military. The real question is -- did they support the military. Rush Limbaugh has never turned his back on the military, unlike the likes of Salinas and Franken.

Salinas wrote, "in 1988, [Rush's] radio program became nationally syndicated and took off. Because of his popularity, some Republicans [thankfully] made the mistake of following him" and they won back the Congress in the second year of [Fourth Tiered] President Clinton's first term. See what I noted about bipartisanship earlier. Democrats will never act bipartisan towards Republicans, it's alway Republicans acting bipartisan towards liberals.

And get this. I love when Salinas wrote, "in 1994, after calling liberal women 'feminazis' and referring to then 13-year-old Chelsea Clinton as 'the family dog,' Republicans named him 'an honorary member of Congress.' And Mohammed goes on to blame Rush's partisan rhetoric on how the exteme left operates today. It's completely crazy folks, and you UH weak minded students, don't you fall for it one bit.

The democrats themselves let themselves be taken over by partisan hacks such as the MoveOn.orgers, Howard Dean, George Soros, and his group of malcontents. They won't give us their plan, because if they were honest and gave us their plans, the people would think the libs were as extreme as Stalin.

Near the end of Mohammed's dragging tripe he noted liberal radio show host Ed Shultz, and of a liberal blogger who "'outed' a supposed gay Republican senator. Salinas wrote, "thankfully, the 'liberal media' didn't cover this issue or name him, mainly because Conservative bloggers have alot of ammunition on liberal Senator Harry Reid, whose Shady Land Deals and Illegal Use of Campaign Funds have recently come to light, and are much worse than outing someone.

For you liberals who want to be "Shultz Shafted," Ed is on AM 740 at night when nobody is listening, because if 740 ran his tripe during the day, they would go the way of Air America. Broke.

Mohammed lastly appeals to his fellow liberals, that "in two weeks, people won’t be voting to make some partisan squeal with delight as if their football team won. They are voting for change, for progress (code word for liberalism), and this can only be achieved by adults who believe in bipartisanship (means Republicans voting with liberals or stayiing home).

Don't let Salinas fool you folks with his liberal code-words, or your dreams will go up in smoke as the United States works in bipartisanship with North Korea and Iran. After that, it won't matter.

Screw the Godless libs and the dem-leaning Mods!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Hasan Rizvi 'Please Spare NorKom People' (Al-Qaeda will need their help to kill Americans later)

2006-10-20T16:53:00.000-05:00

Man, al-UH Daily Cougar Macaca Columnist and future al-Qaeda Finance Minister Hasan Rizvi really cares about the North Korean (NorKom) people.

Did you know that NorKom people live in an oppressed society and hardly don't have anything to eat. My God, where is the liberal outraged?

I mean, the liberals will insist that we go halfway around the World to Somalia to help those with hardly anything to eat, only to cut-and-run when pressed.

In his tripe today "Keep Korean people in mind," Rizvi wants us to keep our minds on the most mind-numbed people in the World -- the innocent NorKoms.

I say forget it Rizvi, all aid that has been "earmarked" for the NorKom people has went straight to the North Korean Army. And you know that the pot-bellied, dog eating dictator will never allow inspectors into North Korea to check for something as simple as that.

Thankfully Rizvi recognizes that "Kim Jong-Il’s propaganda says that the people of North Korea are the 'happiest and freest people in the world,' but the opposite is closer to the truth."

Rizvi gives us his swan song over the NorKom peoples daily intake. For instance, "the average daily intake for a North Korean is 600 calories, one-fourth of what the human body usually requires." Who cares? Kim Jong-Il doesn't.

The Clinton Administration was fooled by the NorKom's when we gave their people food, and I would argue that the Clinton's knew that the food we donated to NorKom's was going straight to their army, when at the same time "as many as 3 million may have starved to death; others barely got by consuming things such as boiled grass." Hell, back then the Clinton Administration would do anything for good poll numbers.

Hasan Rizvi sees the NorKom leader as "indifferent to the suffering of innocent people" but he doesn't condemn Kim Jong-Il. To Hasan, its about how "we should not repeat the mistakes we made when dealing with Saddam Hussein’s regime."

Hasan is afraid that UN imposed sanctions will allow the NorKom people to suffer even more, and of course it will be the United States' fault. Who cares? Liberals don't, all they want is power back, and they don't care who they destroy or who has to die for them to get it.

So why spare the North Korean people in the hunt for Kim Jong-Il? Because the NorKom's are a people that hate the United States, and al-Qaeda needs all the friends it can get.

Screw the Godless libs and the dem-leaning Mods!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Dawn Rorie 'Knows Christian Conservatives Will Vote' (Now calling Foley a pedophile, when he had no sex with teens)

2006-10-20T08:58:00.000-05:00

The liberals attempts to oust Republicans by scandal, because they know they can't oust them via the ballot box is still continuing to fail. I don't know who those so-called "Christian Conservatives" are that the liberal media are talking to, but the ones that I know are itching to vote, and overwhelmingly VOTE REPUBLICAN.

My God, you now have the liberal Nick Lampson running an "ATTACK AD" against his Write-in opponent Shelly Sekula-Gibbs for District 22. Lampson's actions really projects an aire of reality into his campaign, and he is confidently desperate since he's down by double-digits in the polls.

Liberals, the gig is up. Times have changed. People are not as stupid as you think not to think about national security first when they step near that voting machine. Because to have racism, to have abortion, to have welfare, and to be soft on dangerous criminals, all the things that liberals want, you have to have a safe America. Safe from terrorist attack and the threat of attack.

Efforts to keep the Foley scandal going are worthless. The weirdo is gone, and there is a replacement candidate in his place. But why the switch from tainting Foley from gay to a pedophile. I know why, and in comes in the form of Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist and Houston Voice writer Crystal "Meth" Dawn Rorie who has laid down a thick layer of goop for UH weak minded students to wade through along with all that rain we got recently.

In her tripe yesterday "GOP spreads false info about pedophilia," Crystal Dawn, UH's own little English lesbian whore, who will soon be serving hamburgers and fries at the local Montrose Burger King, is doing the bidding of the Gay publication The Houston Voice and trying to persuade her ten readers that Foley is a pedophile, when it has been proven he had no sex with anyone underage.

It was the Democrat Party's idea of "outing gays" in the Republican Party in hopes of convincing Christian Conservatives not to vote that paid too much attention to the cause of the gays. We haven't heard anything of that so-called "list of Gay-Republicans" because it rubbed liberal gays the wrong way, and made them look to themselves as deviants. Hence we get Crystal Dawn trying to write her version of the story that Foley is a pedophile, when he has no such history. I'm not defending Foley for his stupid actions, but damnit, he is a gay man and not a pedophile.

If you want to talk Gay pedophile, let's talk liberal Gary Studds who had sex with a 17 year old male page. Studd's wanted the boy so bad that he took him to Morocco to boink his brains out. Congress censured Studds for boinking the boy, and Studd's district was stupid enough to re-elect him until he retired in 1996. Of course Rorie couldn't reach Studds for comment because he recently died, presumably after having sex with an underaged male.

Rorie starts off her lying tripe with "Mark Foley knew the last thing the Republican Party needed in the weeks leading up to the midterm elections was a sex scandal -- especially one involving a congressman, sexually explicit e-mails and underage boys."

Of course Crystal Dawn Rorie won't tell you that the e-mails are three years old, the boy was actually an adult, and it was the IM's, which I've never heard of anyone saving ever, that caused the whole scandal. Foley was a setup from the beginning, and quite frankly it did not work.

Rorie also will not tell you that the e-mails were shopped around to the media for almost a year by democrat operatives, and that the FBI said the e-mails showed signs of being tampered with. Foley was a politically timed event, which if the gas prices were not headed down, the Dow not headed up, and the President's poll numbers not headed up, would still be in the democrat jack-in-the-box waiting to be sprung about ten days before the November elections. But since everything is going good, Foley was the only issue in the democrats bag and they had to spring him on the public.

When you really think about it, using Foley as their only issue makes a sad case for the democrats. Foley is being used to taint the Republicans as a bunch of "gays" so that the Christian and Principled Conservatives will stay home come election day. Foley should have been welcomed by the gay community when he announced he was gay. The only confirmed pedophile that I know of in the Congress was Studds, and to say that Foley is one without proof is, well, that how liberalism works.

As far as I'm concerned Republican efforts to counter the liberals on the Foley damage have been tame. The Conservative bloggers have been instrumental in pointing fact after fact about the scandal, and that the whole thing was really a SET-UP. Liberals have spewed lie after lie about the pervert Foley trying to damage the Republican Party as a whole, and I'm confident that they will be surprised come election day about how much it will hurt the democrat party.

Hell, when the democrats have to borrow money ($5 mil) to run their campaign, that stinks to high heaven to me. There are more democrat millionaires in the Senate than Republicans, and the democrats are seen as the party of the poor people? And these poor people who never seem to get out of the dumps, yet they still depend heavily on the liberals.

Crystal Dawn Rorie hopes to be one of those liberals that the poor depend on in the future, and she will use every GOP scandal she can get her hands on to get there.

Screw the Godless libs and the dem-leaning Mods!

Al-Qaeda Supporting Democrats to Win the Mid-Term Elections (Expect their pre-election message of hope for Democrats soon)

2006-10-18T09:05:00.000-05:00

The following is the presumed Al-Qaeda pre-election message of hope and support for the Democrat Party in the 2006 mid-term elections against the mean and viscious party of American aggression towards peaceful Muslim freedom fighters in Iraq, Afghanistan, and all the World.

"My Dear American Democratic Party Friends, fellow George Bush haters, and American Imperialists Army and Navy haters:

Osama Bin Laden himself expresses his thanksgiving for the American Democratic Party and their highly skilled efforts along with like-minded American progressive journalists friends in the American media, to presuade Americans to support Democrats in the November mid-term elections. We need your support in the American government if we are to prevail against the American imperialists army and navy.

Osama Bin Laden is thankful for American Democrats and their like-minded American progressive journalists friends in the American media, and Osama Bin Laden himself sends an uplifting message to the Democrat Party in hopes of springing them to the polls and defeating the evil George Bush, his political devil party, and the American imperialists army and navy.

Once American Democrats win all their mid-term elections in November, I look forward to meeting with American Democrats in hopes of normalizing relations between al-Qaeda and the American Democratic Party, so that we can spread more of the Islamic faith into the American Democratic Party, plot to rid the world of the evil George Bush, his political devil party, and the American imperialists army and navy.

Allahu Akbar* and Death to America."

* Allah is the Greatest

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Colin Ferguson 'Feds Need to Explore 9/11 Theories' (Actually believes 9/11 to be a Bush controlled demolition)

2006-10-17T10:08:00.000-05:00

Did you know that Bush blew up the World Trade Center?

My God. If it weren't for brave liberals like Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Colin K. Ferguson, UH students would be the most uninformed people in America about 9/11 theories. Yeah right.

Facts man. It's about facts. We all saw those planes fly into the WTC fully loaded with fuel. There were no Bush controlled demolition teams on the ground that day; it was in the air with those ragheads flying those airplanes.

In his tripe today "Feds must address 9/11 theories," Colin Ferguson, UH's own Chicken Little, is trying to cause a little fuss over "the latest news regarding 9/11 conspiracy theories comes out of Wisconsin, where a University of Wisconsin-Madison professor likened President Bush to Adolf Hitler in materials for his course." Ho hum, another liberal professor trying to get into the spotlight, trying to compare 9/11 to Hitler's burning of the Reichstag in Nazi Germany. OK Bush is Hitler, we're all numb to those libs and their right to free speech, unlike liberals like Denise E. Hewitt who has no problem doing away with free speech when it hurts her or other liberals.

The lib prof that Colin proudly proclaims Bush is Hitler is "Kevin Barrett, the professor in question, [who] is a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, an organization that claims U.S. officials organized the attacks on the World Trade Center."

What Ferguson doesn't tell us in his tripe today was that Scholars for 9/11 Truth founder Jim Fetzer was on "The O'Reilly Factor," the other night and and Bill tore Fetzer another asshole.

Fetzer in no way presented any argument nor could he present one fact that President Bush was responsible for the 9/11 Attacks, and I was glad that O'Reilly treated him like the loon that Fetzer is.

Ferguson's blind allegiance to liberal prof's, even profs that are a half-country away calls into question his sexuality -- is he a knee bender, or not?

Ferguson evidently finds credence in the loon Barrett's argument or he wouldn't have written his tripe today. "Although many believe some or most of the official explanation, they still find reasons to doubt the whole story," Ferguson opined.

Ferguson goes on to enlighten us to more 9/11 theorist tripe by telling us of "'Loose Change,' a documentary that raises a number of questions surrounding the events of 9/11," and expounds the belief that "several of the named hijackers being alive and well in the countries of their origin." That's how crazy Colin K. Ferguson is ladies and gentlemen.

UH weak minded students. Tear out Ferguson's DC tripe today, rip it out, like those pages in the Dead Poets Society, it's pure excrement.

Ferguson's insistance that "we must entertain these alternate explanations, if only to debunk them," is completely absurd. Those libs are nothing more than people in their own internal prisons filing frivolous lawsuits about not getting enough peanut butter and crackers in their daily diets or something. It's crazy.

I would think that Kristen Young half-way thought of posting Ferguson's tripe on the funny pages. I mean really, the next thing you know Colin K. Ferguson will be writing about the conspiracy that President Roosevelt actually let the Japanese attack the US Navy Fleet at anchor in Pearl Harbor to launch us into WWII. Now that's real conspiracy.

Screw the Godless libs and the dem-leaning Mods!

Foley Scandal Pales in Comparison to Liberal Harry Reid Shady $1.1M Windfall Profit on Shady Land Deal 'No calls from liberals for Reid to RESIGN'

2006-10-16T11:25:00.000-05:00

Liberal Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid recently hung up on an AP Reporter probing a $1.1 million dollar profit on that the democrat Senator made on land that he did not even own at the time.

The Strata-Sphere Blog with its recent post The Reid Kickbacks details a tremendous amount of damaging information, and if thing doesn't get picked up by the national media, especially the Fox News Channel, I'm going to explode. CNBC had a passing news story so far, but if the national media delays any further in its release, hell this might get released just days before the election.

Of course, this is a real liberal scandal right before an election. Where's ABC's Brian Ross when you need his lame liberal ass? Ross is only on scene when scandal hurts Republicans.

Of course, when liberals say that the media is bent Conservative this really tells the tale. Liberals leave no stone unturned when it comes to Foley, but when it comes to "Dingy" Harry and his scandal they can't even find Reid's stones, and according to The Strata-Sphere, there are sure a hell of a lot of them.

John Solomon's AP story "Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid collected a $1.1 million windfall on a Las Vegas land sale even though he hadn't personally owned the property for three years, property deeds show," shows the latest democrat culture of corruption example with Reid's land deal by lying to Congress with his disclosures noting that he still owned the land when he didn't.

Solomon's story doesn't even explain the half of the wrongdoing of "Dingy" Harry Reid with his longtime friend Jay Brown, who is a casino lawyer and somehow mixed up in organized crime. My God, if Reid were a Republican, this would dwarf even the North Korean Nuclear Crisis, but no, since Reid is a liberal, it will not hardly get any news coverage. At least not until after the election.

We haven't even got to the dealings with Harry Reid's son, who is a Clark County Nevada Commissioner, and the underhanded dealings that he has engaged in, nor how Senator Reid manipulated the Interior Department to forego regulation protecting endangered animals and environmental protections.

My God, Reid is breaking every liberal commandment from hurting endangered animals to breaking environmental regulations just to make a quick buck, and he wants to be in charge of the Senate? Who are we kidding?

"The Nevada Democrat's deal was engineered by Jay Brown, a longtime friend and former casino lawyer whose name surfaced in a major political bribery trial this summer and in other prior organized crime investigations." Brown has only had a "1981 federal securities complaint that was settled out of court" so his record is clean, but Senator Reid has broken Federal Law by knowingly misinforming the Senate of his fraudlent land deal which can net him jail time if he were to be prosecuted. No wonder he wants to pay any fines so quickly.

This whole Reid mess really stinks, and it's a goddamn shame the liberal media is still talking about Foley, when the guy is gone. I'm quite confident that Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Blogosphere are not going to let this Reid scandal go. The double standard between liberal democrats doing wrong and the liberal media not reporting their mess has got to stop. The AP started this, and by God Rush and the Conservative Blogosphere are going to finish it.

"Land deeds obtained by The Associated Press during a review of Reid's business dealings show: The deal began in 1998 when Reid bought undeveloped residential property on Las Vegas' booming outskirts for about $400,000. Reid bought one lot outright, and a second parcel jointly with Brown." Four years later, "in 2001, Reid sold the land for the same price to a limited liability corporation created by Brown" for the same price as he sold it. Look, land appreciates, and after four years, he should have made some interest in the land.

Here is where the fooling the Senate comes into play. Senator Reid "didn't disclose the sale on his annual public ethics report or tell Congress he had any stake in Brown's company. He continued to report to Congress that he personally owned the land" even when he knew he had sold the land. That breaks federal law, and we don't hear anyone calling for the liberal Reid's resignation or any investigation.

"After getting local officials [including Reid's commissioner son Rory] to rezone the property for a shopping center, Brown's company sold the land in 2004 to other developers and Reid took $1.1 million of the proceeds, nearly tripling the senator's investment. Reid reported it to Congress as a personal land sale."

And get this, democrat Senator Harry Reid, was able to ditch the most of the taxes due to the deals complexity, and still pocketed a cool mil. All of this took place three years after the land was sold by Dingy Harry and his wife.

Democrat Senator Harry Reid didn't even own the land, yet still pocketed a million bucks, he lied to Congress, and still the liberal media focuses their efforts on that Foley perv.

This will break soon.

Screw the Godless libs and the dem-leaning Mods!

Lights on the Korean Pennisula 'It reminds one of the differences between the Republicans and Democrats' (But I can't quite place it?)

2006-10-15T12:23:00.000-05:00

Looking at the Korea Pennisula light situation from the perspective of ideas. There is a big difference from the democratic people's in the North, and the Republic of Korea in the South.

In the democratic people's republic people must be appreciative to government for their meager rations and not look at anyone in a bad way or be jailed.

In the Republican South, technology is a world leader, and they have plenty of food in their stomachs.

In the democratic people's republic Kim Jong-Il starves his people, they can't speak out, and yet KJI gets the liberals respect.

In the Republican South, their activitists are allow to protest freely against the ROK and the US.

Of course the map can correspond to our own democrats and Republicans as well.

On the democrats side, no ideas [no lights], a Culture of Corruption with Kennedy, the unbroken story of the Harry Reid land scandal, skewed polls that say democrats will win everything in November.

On the Repulicans side, new ideas [plenty of lights], some problems but they are way overplayed such as with Foley, current polls that show them losing just as they did in 2004, but watchout. And a growing sense to just stomped democrats into the ground on issues, and call their bluffs.

If Americans are willing to swing left in the middle of a war like the chickens in Spain, then we deserve what we get from al-Qaeda. They recognize weakness in the left and are willing to capitalize on liberal cowering.

If we stand firm, then we have a chance at a much safer world, one hopefully free of nuclear threats from North Korea and Iran.

Screw the Godless libs and the dem-leaning Mods!

A Few Random Thoughts - XXXVI

2006-10-15T00:34:00.000-05:00

- It seems that well over 50% of the people in the al-UH DC's "Five Minutes of Fame" on Pg. 2 are from the Middle East.

- If the democrat party wins the House, I will close this blog. (That's how confident I am about November).

- Liberal radio fails because the liberal media saturates the publics mind's with liberal thought and liberal radio offers nothing new.

- Conservative radio succeeds because they report the news that the liberal media should be reporting, if the the lib media were 'fair and balanced. '

- To the person that dropped me the juicy details about Denise Hewitt -- I hail thee as "The DC Insider."

- To Austin, thanks for being a good sport. I'm sure that you bath regularly and try to find that razor on ocassion.

- Cindy Sheehan lost her bid for the Nobel Peace Prize Friday. It went to Bangladeshi economist Muhammad Yunus, the so-called "Banker to the Poor", who will use the money to help more poor people get out of poverty.

Sheehan would have used the money to help herself spread more President Bush hatred since she is desperately running out of the insurance money her Son died for.

- Harry Reid, discomposure is coming.

Screw the Godless libs and the dem-leaning Mods!

If This Navy SEAL Doesn't Deserve The MEDAL OF HONOR 'Then No One Does' (Liberals will never understand this kind of sacrifice)

2006-10-14T00:01:00.000-05:00

---------------------------
This photo provided by the U.S. Navy shows Navy SEAL Michael A. Monsoor, left, on patrol in Iraq in 2006. Monsoor died Friday, Sept. 29, 2006, in Ramadi, Iraq, when he threw himself on a grenade to save fellow SEALs. (AP Photo/U.S. Navy)
---------------------------

Petty Officer 2nd Class Michael A. Monsoor, a member of the Navy SEALs literally threw himself on top of a grenade thrown at his position by insurgents in Iraq.

He knowingly and willingly sacrificed his life so that his fellow SEALs could live.

Folks, I know that the 99.5% of you out there have not seen combat, and many of you are thinking "why did he die for Bush of all people."

I'll tell you why Michael did what he did. When you are on the front lines, it's not about fighting for the folks back home, or about President Bush, the Congress, or even the policy that placed that person on the frontline. It's not even about Conservatives or liberals, or the liberal news media for that fact.

It's about the men next to you in war. That men you have trained with all the time. The buddy that cuts your hair for you. The buddy that makes you laugh, or saves your seat in the mess tent. It's about the men in your squad that you have made it through some hard times with under fire, whose intentions you can read from a gesture or a glance.

That foreign insurgent grenade may have killed Michael's body but his spirit lives on in his fellow SEALS. He will get the Medal of Honor, I can feel it in my bones.

"He never took his eye off the grenade, his only movement was down toward it," said a 28-year-old lieutenant who sustained shrapnel wounds to both legs that day. "He undoubtedly saved mine and the other SEALs' lives, and we owe him" an AP report noted.

Liberals will never understand this kind of sacrifice.

Screw the Godless libs and the dem-leaning Mods!

Fox News: Air America Radio Files for Bankruptcy Protection

2006-10-13T13:55:00.000-05:00

NEW YORK - Air America Radio, a liberal talk and news radio network that features the comedian Al Franken, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, a network official told The AP.

The network had denied rumors just a month ago that it would file for bankruptcy protection. On Friday, Air America spokeswoman Jaime Horn told The Associated Press that the filing became necessary only recently after negotiations with a creditor from the privately held company's early days broke down.

The network will stay on the air while it resolves issues with its creditors, Horn said. In addition to Franken, the network also features shows from liberal talk show host Randi Rhodes and syndicates shows from Jerry Springer and Portland, Ore.-based talk show host Thom Hartmann.

Horn declined to name the creditor with which talks had reached a logjam. The company will operate in the interim with funding from its current investor group.
Air America also said Friday it had named Scott Elberg as its new CEO. Elberg, a former general manager of the radio station WLIB in New York, has been with the network since May of last year.

The filing and executive shuffle marked the latest turbulence at the liberal talk radio network, which went on the air two years ago. This April, Danny Goldberg stepped down as CEO and was replaced by an interim chief executive from a management consulting firm.

"Nobody likes filing for bankruptcy," Elberg said in a statement. "However, this move will enable us to concentrate on informing and entertaining our audience during the coming months."

Air America has struggled financially since its inception. According to documents filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, the company lost $9.1 million in 2004, $19.6 million in 2005 and $13.1 million so far in 2006.

Air America also disclosed in the court documents that two directors departed in the last two months, Douglas Kreeger and Tom Embrescia. Gary Krantz also departed as president in June, and executive vice president Tom Athans and chief operating officer Carl Ginsburg both left in July.

AP Story
------------------------------------------------

Of course you won't see this on the Air America Radio Website. I thought radio stations were in business to make money? And even big bankrolled liberals cannot sustain failure indefinitely.

UH Daily Cougar Columnist Lashic Patterson 'Slavery Destroyed the Black Family' (No way -- Democrat Socialist Programs did)

2006-10-13T10:18:00.000-05:00

I'm sure that UH Daily Cougar columnist Lashic Mondrell Patterson was well intentioned to blame the current state of the Black Family on a bunch of "white guys," but I believe that she got mixed up on the correct bunch of "white guys" to blame, and although they are not southern slave owners, they still do see the US Black population as still being part of a liberal plantation of intellectual slavery. White liberal politicians.

In her tripe today, "Children need present parents," Patterson raves about Jonetta Rose Barras' book "Whatever Happened to Daddy's Little Girl?" Pointing out that "only 35 percent of black children in the United States live with their biological parents. Sixty percent of all black children live in homes where fathers are absent, and only 47 percent of black households are headed by married couples."

Hmm. What caused this?

Some, like Edward Franklin Frazier and Daniel Patrick Moynihan, as Patterson states say that the Black family "was destroyed by slavery, where many family units of African descent were split up, enslaved and sold separately." But slavery ended 141 years ago, and you would think that the Black family would have been able to find each other following slavery and carry on.

And that's just what they did. Blacks are a tough people man. Jonathan David Lightfoot wrote in his essay "The Strength of the Black Family," that "the Black family in America has overcome many trials and tribulations. It took strong individuals to withstand the horrors of the Middle Passage from Africa to the Americas, which often lasted more than two months. The subhuman treatment they received at the hands of their European captors required strong bodies, willful minds, and determined spirits to survive."

And yet the Black Family still survives.

Yes, slavery was an was an abomination, but it did not cause the breakup of the Black Family, and I would argue that slavery actually strenghtened the state of the Black Family. During Reconstruction and beyond, the Black Family depended on one another to survive. They branched out in all different professions, and to the different parts of the country. They invented, they pioneered, they helped make America, all the while being persecuted because of their race.

And yet the Black Family still survives.

I recall seeing a PBS special several years back heralding the achievements of the Black Family, and showing these beautiful Black Neigborhoods in Washington DC and New York, and how in many ways they surpased White communities. From what I gathered the 1920s to the 1950s were around the peak of that era, until they turned into a Skid Row.

What caused the decline? Liberal government, and their handouts.

Liberal government relieved Black men from their responsibilities as breadwinners when liberals stepped in with their welfare programs. In fact, Black women were discouraged from having a man in the house in order to receive their entitlements, but, they were not discouraged from having further babies in order to receive higher monthly payments. Black men weren't even given a chance to fend for their families. Some did, and we get those 35 percent of children that live with their biological parents.

How many Black peoples lives have been ruined because of liberal programs? How many Black people are dependent on liberal programs just to survive? And it's designed to be that way folks by White Liberals, whom many Black people are bound to vote for for fear of losing their meager handouts.

How many times have I condemned Jesse Jackson for not conveying a message of hope and self determination to his own Black People. All we hear from the Black apologists is "stand behind me, I'll protect you from being discriminated from that evil white man."

Black apologists are just as guilty as white liberals for holding Blacks down and destroying the Black Family, all so that they can keep their power. Do the Black apologists ever express individuality? No. They want a group. Do they ever express responsibility? No. They need a dependent voting group dependent on liberal democrats.

I know Bill Cosby has been sounding off about the state of the Black Family, and how it needs desperate attention. You won't read about that hope, because Lashic Patterson refuses to believe in Black individuality and self determination.

Screw the Godless libs!

What is the Difference Between Presidents Who SUPPORT and Those Who LOATH the US Military?

2006-10-13T08:09:00.000-05:00

A Third-Tier President

A Fourth-Tier President

Dick Morris has divided presidents into four categories: first tier, second tier, third tier, and the rest.

Just five -- Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, Wilson, and Franklin Roosevelt made Morris's first tier.

Polk, Theodore Roosevelt, Truman and Ronald Reagan were in the second tier.

Kennedy, Johnson, GHW Bush were in the third tier.

Clinton asked Morris, "What do I need to do to be first tier?" Morris replied, "You can't, you have to win a war."

Twenty-two presidents - make up Morris' fourth tier (unrated) of uneventful administrations fell by the wayside. Or are still looking for legacies other than oral sex.

Al-UH Daily Cougar Eddys 'At Least They Recognize Stalinists Tactics When Seen' (Liberals Rush Minutemen Stage at Columbia -- Halt Free Speech)

2006-10-12T09:35:00.000-05:00

YouTube has it.

Video of Columbia University liberals, adults mind you, acting childish, imposing their Stalinist vision on a peaceful speech given by Minutemen Project founder Jim Gilchrist recently.

Thankfully Kristen Young and her gang of editors wrote in the DC editorial today, "Protest of Minutemen at Columbia misguided," stating that "a chance for an open debate and discussion of a national issue was trampled under the feet of pro-immigration and migrant rights activists at a Columbia University lecture hall last week."

I remember a television show a long while back about a liberal university that somehow invited a Conservative to speak. They wanted to protest, but also recognized his right to free speech. Back then, they didn't rush the stage like little children, they just walked out.

We have a right to free speech. The legitimate audience at that event had a right to hear the visiting speaker, and those Stalinists libs completely trampled their rights.

I certainly hope that a political commercial of this liberal stupidity makes it out there during this campaign season to show the future of the democrat party. A bunch of childish pansies that can't stand for free speech to be heard especially when they are against it.

Columbia officials need to use the video evidence and kick out the Stalinists organizers of the protest that took place there. From the looks of it, half of the protesters probably weren't even Columbia students, and it sends the country a message that Columbia University is the leftist school of choice.

We can all hope that UH liberal groups are watching. Crushing free speech is not funny. That speech was crashed because the Minutemen are a very effective group. Those children at Columbia are of the mindset that our population is perpetually sustainable on liberal handouts to anyone who can make it across our borders. It's not. And one day our immigration policy will have to be curbed sharply.

"The protestors proved nothing and gained no support for their cause by rushing that stage," said the Eddys. "They called attention to their cause, yes, but lost the respect of many more" and it showed a desperate effort from a liberal cause that is fracturing at the seam. Just like the democrat party as a whole.

Screw the Godless libs!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Isaiah Warner 'Sees North Korea Nuke Problem as a Bush Creation' (No wonder he's President of the YONG Democrats at UH)

2006-10-11T10:09:00.000-05:00

-----------------------------------------------
Does this "Pat" fight for Lesbian GBT Rights or Man/Boy Love Rights

Find out today in the Daily Cougar
-----------------------------------------------

I'm not going to spend to much time on Isaiah Nathaniel Warner's absolute excrement today about the Korean Nuclear Crisis. Not once did the President of the YONG Democrats at UH even mention Der Schlick Meister who started all this crap with his foreign policy of actually believing brutal dictators and giving them nuclear technology.

That's liberalism for you. They have more faith in brutal dictators who kill and starve their own people than they do for American citizens. They thirst for power so much, that in the face of real danger with North Korea that Warner engages in the blame game.

Warner knows that when he tries to understand the North Korean nuclear crisis, it starts with Bill Clinton and his Administration giving North Korean nuclear technology and fuel. Attempts to blame Bush really fall on deaf ears, no matter what other policy the Bush Administration has engaged in internationally.

Warner's tripe "North Korea now imminent threat," expresses his "futility" at the North Korean nuclear crisis. And incredibly, now Warner wants action from President Bush, saying "we must move forward to what the United States will do from here." What?

Warner proclaims himself as a "die-hard Astros fan." No one knows this because they weren't paying attention to his lame ass, but he was the "jackass in the Mezzanine yelling the entire game" during last year's marathon Game 4 of the NLDS.

Obviously, the liberal wants more of a chance to spread his Stalinists views around, and that takes time. Nuclear weapons will for sure interrupt that timetable.

I was surprised that Warner actually criticized North Korea for refusing to take part in Six-Party talks. We are talking about an enemy of the United States and the liberal actually sides with the United States.

Since North Korea has a history of selling arms to the "highest bidder" it is safe to assume that once perfected, North Korea could become the newest "Nukes 'R Us."

I think we need to examine how many sexual IM contacts did Warner have with gay Representatives when he worked for Jessica Farrar in the Texas Legislature in 2005.

Screw the Godless libs!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Offers Plethora of Foreign Policy Failure Ideas (The US must understand, appease, and die so as not to offend anyone)

2006-10-10T09:39:00.000-05:00

UH's "Cousin It" Austin Havican is prepping himself just as he did following the 9/11 attacks.

"We need to understand North Korea, so that they will love us."

The non-brainwashed North Koreans who are starving probably do love us Austin, its just the ones with their finger on the nuclear trigger that don't.

Why do liberals love dictators so much? Because the libs are jealous they don't have that power the dictators enjoy.

The pot-bellied dog eating dictator Kim Jong Il is not going to stop any of his programs because American liberals send good vibes towards him. And liberals will certainly not admit that their liberal God Clinton created this little nuclear monster with his appeasement programs towards Pyongyang in the 1990's by supplying them with nuclear technology and fuel rods.

In his tripe today "Options for diplomacy changed," UH's own Chicken Little Colin Ferguson, wants us to follow Colin Powell of all people in getting North Korea's finger off the nuclear trigger. Powell, I might remind you, if he would have had his way, would have gone down as one of the world's greatest appeasers next to Neville Chamberlain, since he advised against Operation Desert Storm and he for sure did not see Saddam Hussein as a threat to the future world.

Colin and Colin are both lambs. My God, there is no talking your way out of this one, especially with the corrupt United Nations involved. No matter how much porn we send to Kim Jong Il, he's probably got all the best stuff anyway to keep him occupied for a long time. Any food that the world sends feed the starving North Korean people goes straight to his army. How can liberals continue to be fooled so easily by that worthless creature just boggles the mind.

Ferguson tries to blame the whole North Korea thing on President Bush when he writes "in order to salvage our current situation, we must first understand our failure, and then, knowing that, ready ourselves for the labor ahead in protecting a newer, more dangerous world. Our success in defusing this new tension is dependent upon not making the mistakes that lead us here." Ferguson, it was the Clinton's appeasement that got us to this point, and I can assure you that the United States will not be giving North Korea any more nuclear technology unless Hillary Clinton makes it to the White House. See, he didn't admit, he won't admit it, that liberals caused this whole mess.

You can be sure that if North Korea gets their nukes, that Iran will be next on the block, and Hugo Chavez will then raise a stink somehow. It's as if we are facing a nuclear "domino theory," in which if one aggressive country gets nukes and the world does nothing about it, the others are sure to follow, and pretty soon some large city in the world goes "boom," via some terrorists plot.

North Korea ushered in the "poor man's" nuclear era last Sunday, and liberals like Colin Ferguson see the US as the bad guys. If we don't take out North Korean nuclear capabilities in the next few months, then there will be hell to pay when their product takes out a good chunk of an American city and leaves the rest uninhabitable for many decades to come.

LA would be a good start.

Screw the Godless libs!

Action Must Be Taken Against North Korea (If not, then Iran will, by making and using their own nuclear weapons)

2006-10-10T00:26:00.000-05:00

Make no mistake. When liberals like Hillary Clinton try and blame President Bush for North Korea's exploding an underground nuclear weapon by taking his eye off the ball, lets all examine how North Korea got nuclear weapons in the first place.

The main perpetrator in North Korea's ability to get nuclear technology was Bill Clinton, aka Der Schlick Meister, who in working with Kim Jong Il's daddy Kim Il Sung in 1993, when North Korea threatened to withdraw from the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Of course North Korea had its demands, and the wimpy Clinton Administration yielded by offering diplomatic recognition, ending economic sanctions, and giving North Korea a million tons of grain, a 1/2 million tons of heating oil yearly, and guess what -- 2 light-water reactors, that the communist North Koreans promised to use only for peaceful means.

Ladies and Gentlemen, the liberals acting under the guise of helping an underprivleged communist country, have 13 years later given North Korea the capabilities of creating nuclear weapons.

Liberals caused this, and you won't read or hear about it in the liberal media. They'll claim that Bush caused this. My ass. Bill Clinton caused this, and now President Bush has to clean it up.

When nuclear tensions on the Korean peninsula increased in 1994, Clinton sent Jimmy Carter, and eventually UN demands for facility inspections and the return of fuels rods were dropped. This from the political party that the liberal media is propping up in each evening news broadcast.

And let us not forget that Carter once called the brutal Kim Il Sung "a man of justice," and probably sees Kim Jong Il in a better light than he sees President Bush.

Following Kim Il Sung's death in July 1994, the mad Kim Jong Il in October 1994 received even more nuclear power stations under threat at a Geneva conference with the Clinton Administration.

My God, can you imagine the scandal that would have brewed if a Republican Administration would have handed North Korea nuclear technology to create a nuclear bomb? But of course, the liberal press gives Clinton another pass, and Senator Clinton has the gaul to blame President Bush.

Don't be fooled folks. The CBS Evening News' efforts trying to fool people into thinking that Republicans are finally "more corrupt" than democrats is completely crazy. The evening news (and all news for that matter) is a product like fruit at your local grocery store, and it is very easy to determine when that product spoils in the form of lower newspaper circulations and lost viewership. Even Fox News loses a few viewers sometimes, but they are still better than the liberal competition by four times.

The Clinton Administration not only dropped their pants for Kim Jong Il, they bent over and extended a private assurance that the US would not attack nor destroy North Korea. Millons of tons of US donated food slated to the North Korean people went straight to Kim Jong Il's army, at a time in the 1990's when North Korea was facing a deadly famine.

A 1995 Clinton NIE declared that no country, other than those who at that time had nuclear capabilities, would not be able to develop nuclear ballistic missiles within the next fifteen years. Well, we know now that was wrong. China had been well behind in missile technology until the Clinton Administration, and then by 2003 were able to put men in space -- another Clinton legacy besides blow jobs.

The Clinton Administration refused to acknowledge that we were being fooled by the North Koreans. In the late 1990's Madeleine Albright declared that the Clinton Administration has "stopped a nuclear weapons program in North Korea.” Even after North Korea lauched rockets capable of hitting the US, the Clinton Administration refused to see the light.

It was not till near the close of the Clinton Administration that did they admit that their negotitiations with the North Koreans were a crock. They knew that they were getting the reach-around the whole time, but as long as their poll numbers were high they didn't care. Now, in 2006, the United States is paying the price for their focus group greed.

Even after being refusing nuclear inspections in North Korea, Clinton sent him a half-million tons of grain for Kim Jong Il's army. The Clintons also turned their heads when North Korea was building underground facilities, which Japan and China both have confirmed are able to enrich uranium.

By 2002, an official in the Clinton Administration, according to the LA Times acknowledged that they knew at the time of negotiations that the North Koreans were seeking nuclear weapons. They Clinton liberals have been covering up their lies ever since.

Now action must be taken against the North Koreans. Strongly worded letters or sanctions will not work this time. We cannot talk our way out of this one, and the United Nations will be totally impotent as usual. Remind you that the world's tyrants are watching, especially the liberals angel Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. If North Korea is allowed to keep its nuclear weapons technology, then Iran will be emboldened to continue with theirs.

If the liberals win in November, then North Korea and Iran will get their nuke programs fullfilled. Who are liberals to interfere with the world and be seen as a bunch of "meanies." At that time, we will welcome a nuclear terrorists strike on US soil under the auspices of political correctness, which gives terrorists an equal opportunity to kill us before we can stop them.

Screw the libs!

Foley Scandal Fading 'Libs even hounding Allen in VA again' (But it will all backfire on the libs come Election Day; no lib attention paid to Blacks)

2006-10-09T10:05:00.000-05:00

The New York Times got a lesson over the weekend that Evangelicals are not blaming the GOP, but Foley, in the IM scandal between two consenting adults. As facts emerge, it has become known that the Oklahoma page, Jordan Edmund, was 18 at the time of the email and IM exchanges.

Liberals were hoping that the Religious Right would be turned off by the Foley scandal and the GOP, but of course they are again mistaken. They're flat wrong in fact.

Its amazing how liberals are outraged about internet sex between two consenting adults and demanding resignations. But, My God, back in the 1990's when Der Schlick Meister was receiving BJ's in the Oval Office, the libs said "it was a matter between two consenting adults." No liberal was calling for any resignations back then. Back then it was the "politics of personal destruction." Yes, the libs were personally destructing themselves.

The liberals gave standing ovations and continued to elect liberal congressman Gary Studds after he had actually sex with his underage male page in the 1970's. And now the libs are so opposed to sex. Please.

I was amazed to see that the liberal media is still trying to kill the George Allen campaign by reporting that he did not report capital gains. This is the second torpedo fired at Allen since his so-called N-Word scandal did not stick. Of course, now Republicans in Virginia are pissed and have responded so Allen is up in the polls, but their is virtually no bad liberal press about Allen's opponent James Webb who has called Blacks the N-Word, but you won't find that in the lib papers. And how many liberals were amending travel records during the Travelgate scandal the lib papers simply avoided reporting that.

Listening to the Fox News Sunday podcast yesterday, the only real Sunday show, the polls all showed liberals up in the polls. It actually looked bleak for the GOP come November. But I feared not even though it can get you down. The only real polls that count are the ones on Election Day. In reality, the libs have those polls skewed as much as 4-to-1 in the liberals favor to try and sway public opinion, and from the looks of it, learning from the exit polls in 2004, people know better and simply lie about the liberal they supposedly favor or voted for.

No, I think Rush is Right. The GOP could actually pick up a good 50 seats in the House and take full control of the Senate. The liberals have virtually paid no attention to their Black base as of late, and I think they might stay home or try the GOP for many of them for the first time try voting Republican to see if it helps their condition.

By the way, thanks to Kristen Young for a tame DC today, and not covering any ramadan indoctrination rallies.

Screw the libs!

UT Daily Texan 'UT Austin Students Sign Up for Voluntary Indoctrination to Islam' (Participate in Ramadan Event)

2006-10-06T13:50:00.000-05:00

------------------------------------------
Sheik Omar leads a prayer in front of UT students Thursday. One of the objectives of the Fast-a-thon was to provide an avenue of involvement and education for non-Muslim students.
-------------------------------------------

I was going to comment about the al-UH Daily Cougars coverage of the Foley incident, but it was not overly one-sided against the issue. Foley is gone, I'm glad he is gone, a candidate has been chosen to replace him. But the liberals insist on Gay Bashing Republicans, and their tactics will backfire come election time, when the Christian Right and the moderate base vote Republican more than ever. If the al-UH DC continues their coverage on Foley, then I will bring out my ammunition to uncut their arguments.

The al-UT Daily Texan's top story today "Fasting for charity: Students raise money for local food bank by abstaining for 1 day," is nothing more than a voluntary indoctrination to islam, designed as a charity event for the Capital Area Food Bank.

Let me ask you, would Catholic's have been afforded coveted top story al-UT Daily Texan news coverage if they were holding a Rosary Marathon, or a Baptist group holding a good ol' prayer revival to support the Capital Area Food Bank. I think not. The al-UT DT editors would have laughed the Catholics and Baptists off the front page.

I'm looking at this ramadan event from the viewpoint of incrementalism. Just think that 25 years ago, smoking was acceptable until the anti-smoking Nazis started in with their incrementally based anti-smoking program. Now, the Houston City Council is considering banning smoking all over the city.

The anti-smoking Nazis knew that their tactics of forcing everyone to quit smoking all at one time would not work, but by chipping away at the block, in time, liberals will be able to stop us from smoking in our own homes. Now I don't smoke, but I not going to stop any adult from their legal right to light up.

The muslims understand incrementalism. They're patient people. You just watch, in a few years, this one-day event will be dragged out for the whole period of ramadan. Tolerate liberals will show as ususal, but in time that won't satisfy the Muslim Students Association. They'll demand that the whole UT student population observe ramadan and fast. I know that they may appear extreme, but when the Muslim Students Association sees the positive liberal press they are getting they will get big-headed in time.

I was a little concerned about what one pharmacy student said, "it's for charity, but it's also a great way to learn more about Islam." My question is what charity -- al-Qaeda? And the outlet to learn about islam should be a warning sign that we may not be to concerned with right now, but our grandchildren will sure pay the price.

Screw the Godless libs!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Denise Hewitt 'Attacking Wal-Mart on Order from the Young Democrats at UH' (I'm buying more Wal-Mart stock)

2006-10-05T10:03:00.000-05:00

Here it comes again.

The DNC sends out a talking points fax to state party HQs -- ATTACK WAL-MART.

The Texas Democrat Party sends out a talking points fax to county party HQs -- ATTACK WAL-MART.

The Harris County Democrat Party sends out a talking points fax to Young Democrats at UH HQs -- ATTACK WAL-MART.

The Young Democrats at UH sends out a talking points fax to the al-UH Daily Cougar -- ATTACK WAL-MART.

Fearing for her life, Kristen Young, Editor-in-Chief of the al-UH Daily Cougar calls on regurgitator of liberal professor crap columnist Denise E. Hewitt to save the day for the democrats, and insult over one-million people who work for Wal-Mart.

In her tripe today "Wal-Mart wage caps cause rift," Hewitt complains of Wal-Mart's "big box" style and how it has redefined how Americans shop for goods. Evidently, she is angry that her competing communist buddies -- the Chinese -- are outfoxing her and the democrats brand of liberalism.

Hewitt proudly reports that Wal-Mart's expansionism "have driven cities and towns to draw up regulations to prevent themselves from becoming the next location for 60,000 square feet of fluorescently lit merchandise stamped 'Made in China.'" No matter, Wal-Mart has an answer for that, as the liberals in Chicago have seen.

Its called innovation, creative thought, its called business. What Wal-Mart is doing in Chicago is ringing the city limits of Chi-town with its stores, thus allowing the citizens of Chicago to shop at Wal-Mart, while at the same time denying the City of Chicago any tax revenues they would have received via sales.

Hewitt does not see the changing times. Many people do not have time to go to Western Auto for one thing, HEB for one thing, and Cartridge World for one thing. But at Wal-Mart, they have all those things. Wal-Mart will not drive Western Auto, HEB, or Cartridge World out of business. Those that specialize in those things will always be able to keep cost down. For instance, Wal-Mart's meat department is in no way competitive with HEB or Kroger, but its there for a convienence. But in other areas of the store, Wal-Mart is much more competitive with the grocery stores and department stores.

Whether or not Wal-Mart is "the biggest act in town" doesn't matter. They have their shoppers. Liberals are jealous because of their success story, and cry like stuck pigs whenever they get a chance. What they don't realize is that Wal-Mart is not going to take it as we have seen with the prescription drug coup that they recently pulled off.

Liberals created Wal-marts success and Denise continues to do her part with her tripe today.

Hewitt's argument that Wal-mart seeks to cut cost by not providing "a living wage" is crazy. Do we hear of liberals crying that the people who work at McDonald's don't make a living wage. I ate at the McDonald's across from Cougar Field. I didn't recall seeing one teenager, and I doubt if management was paying them a living wage. Where is Hewitt's outrage about that.

At a new Wal-mart just outside of Chicago, 25,000 people applied for less than 500 positions. And liberals complain that Wal-Mart doesn't pay enough. People want to work at Wal-Mart. It really is a step up in life for many people.

Wal-Mart hurts liberalism because of its success. They institute news ideas.

Denise's take on Wal-Mart's "wage caps" is again off and intended to pollute the UH weak minded students into thinking that Wal-Mart is bad. Hewitt doesn't even mention that Wal-Mart raised wages, and is bring more part-timers on board.

Hell, why not a wage cap? I think its good. It promotes a spirit of innovation in a worker to do better in their job to get that management position in the future. I was visiting an old war buddy at the VA Hospital near the UH campus recently. There was a janitor doing his job in the room, we talked a bit, and he said he could do his job completely in 45 minutes what the government pays him to do in 8 hours. In his case, he is being paid to do his job slow, and it other cases other than the gentlemen we talked to, his co-workers do poorly in their work.

In this age companies are just not going to increase your pay just because your around and breathing. One of my Father's friends is a hispanic male and naturalized citizen, and worked for a barge company on the ship channel until he was fired after working for the company for many years. He earned top dollar among the hispanic males who worked for the company. He has since went on to get a better job that pays more.

I think Wal-Mart's wage cap may start a trend. I think it might be a good thing for hourly workers who fear going to work each day for they might be fired for making too much of an hourly wage. Of course over time caps will be raised because that's the nature of business. To keep good people, management knows they have to keep wages competitive.

Hewitt's assertion that Wal-Mart's low wages are creating a dependency in their workers. No, that's the democrat party.

Screw the Godless libs!

Liberal Hypocrisy Abounds 'Libs Have Celebrated Their Congressmans Sexual Misconduct w/Minors' (Rep. Foley didn't even have sex with his page)

2006-10-02T20:43:00.000-05:00

--------------------
LIBERAL CONGRESSMAN
WHO DID NOT ONLY
TALK DIRTY TO MINORS
BUT ALSO HAD SEX
WITH THEM AS WELL
--------------------

Barney Frank's roomate and lover, Stephen Gobie was running a prostitution ring out of Frank's apartment as well as fixing parking tickets for his customers.

Gary Studds had sex with a 17 year old male page. Studd's wanted the boy so bad that he took him to Morocco to boink his brains out. Congress censured Studds for boinking the boy, and his district was stupid enough to re-elect him until he retired in 1996.

Mel Reynolds had sex with a 16 year old campaign volunteer and was indicted in 1994. He tried to play the race card, but was convicted anyway in August 1995.

------------------------------------------------------------------

It's incredible how liberals are trying to spin this. But I doubt its going to last long.

Congressional wanna-be Nick Lampson sent out an e-mail to-nite asking only GOP Congressional Leaders to resign if they had knowledge of the communications. I'm confident that they didn't or else Speaker Denny Hastert would not have made such a forceful statement today.

Lampson must be running desperate since he urged GOP write-in candidate Shelley Sekula Gibbs "to donate the funds she recently received from Congressman Tom Reynolds -- who has admitted he knew of the situation and did nothing about it -- and from any others in congressional leadership who had prior knowledge of Mr. Foley's actions to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children."

HELL NO Nick. For Christ's sake, liberals are probably jealous that they weren't in on Foley's action, and when did the libs take the same action against Frank, Reynolds, or Studds?

The GOP was right to condemn Rep. Foley. It's a hell of a lot more than the DNC would have done to one of their own. The Florida GOP has already replaced Rep. Foley. And the GOP is moving on.

Of course the liberals will try and ride this crested wave as long as they can trying to equate Foley's actions as SOP with the rest of the GOP, but the libs will find themselves as they usually do -- in the trough and on the bottom.

The strategic release of those IM's was not done in order to protect children like Lampson and other stupid liberals would like you to think. The strategic release of those IM's was nothing more than an October surprise designed to get more liberals elected.

Liberals don't care about protecting children. If they did, the IM's would have been published long ago. This escapade will blow up in the libs face. It's going to be another what did the libs know, and when did they know it.

Screw the Godless libs!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist David Salinas 'Religion and Politics Only Bad When it Applies to Christianity' (Muslim and liberals get free pass)

2006-10-02T10:23:00.000-05:00

I've been so busy as of late that I didn't even get a chance to look at any of last weeks al-UH Daily Cougar's on my desk until Sunday evening. Oh yeah, I did check out last Monday's. I'll try and do better this week since my schedule isn't so lumped together.

Continuing on the anti-Christian theme that al-UH DC writers been tasked to engage in by the Harris County Democrat Party, today we find al-UH Daily Cougar columnist and resident cotton picker David Mohammed Salinas on another blame America first anti-Christian rant.

In his tripe today "Religion and politics not a good mix," Salinas attacks the Evangelical movement, more specifically Mohammed focuses on the release of the documentary film Jesus Camp, which has caused controversy because the kids actually pray to President Bush and coordinators enlighten campers on abortion and other Christian issues. The program may appear scary at times, but the point gets across to the campers.

I'm not to concerned about those Evangelical campers, so why is Salinas? Any camp that promotes Christian and anti-abortion attitudes can't be all that bad. I believe Salinas might be jealous. Instead of liberals organizing camps that promote liberal values of oral sex and cut-and-run in wartime, they continue to abort their campers and future democrat voter base.

----------------------------
CHRISTIAN CAMPERS PRAY TO
CARDBOARD CUT-OUTS OF
PRESIDENT BUSH
-------------------------------

What stuck me about Mohammed's piece was his one-sided attack on Christianity when it comes to religion and politics. We hear not a mention about muslims, and how in some muslim countries islam is the body politic. I would imagine muslim summer camps as having classes about hating Jews and Americans, or about how to strap a bomb to your body and go on to your seventy virgins by killing Jewish and American infidels, or how to mention democrat party talking points in their al-Jazeera messages.

---------------------------
LIBERAL CAMPERS PRAY TO
CARDBOARD CUT-OUTS OF
OSAMA BIN LADEN
---------------------------

I and many others have long been disgusted with the liberal blame America first crowd. The parents that send their children to any religious camp know what they are doing. It's none of my business. But seeing as liberals see anyone religiously encamped as dangerous, they want to re-live the great days of the 1990s, when the Clinton Administration took out religiously encamped Christians practicing their way of live in Waco, and wanting to be free from influence of American liberalism.

Salinas attacks noted Christian leaders Robert Grant, Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, and Ralph Reed, and how they've come to have such a grand influence over the Bush Administration. Mohammed took particular disgust in how Christians "handed out 1,000,000 'voter guides' in churches across the country to increase [Conservative] voter mobilization" during the last election. Hmm, I wonder if any Republican candidates ever made it up to the pulpits of any Black Churches in 2004, since during election season white liberals are lining up to fool the Black population again in their churches. That is the true occassion when "mixing religion with politics should not occur." When liberals "exploit religion for their own interests" pretending to "have others' concerns at heart."

Screw the Godless libs!

UH Muslim Pre-emptive Capitulation Program Begins 'New student TV show to further desensitize UH to future Muslim aggresion'

2006-10-01T21:21:00.000-05:00

UH's Student Video Network, also known as 'al-Channel 6,' recently held auditions for a new student production aimed at bringing to light the 'hardships' that three males and one female of Muslim or Indian background have faced since 9/11. Evidently the female gets as little respect in this production as they do in Muslim world or on bended knee in front of Der Schlick Meister, and will probably get the least amount of face time of all the participants in the production. The program inaugurates the beginning of the UH Pre-emptive Capitulation Program designed to be more yielding to muslim students. The fifteen episode series may be titled 'Equilibrium,' but other names such as 'Terrorists are People Too,' or 'The Liberals Guide to Pre-emptive Capituatlion,' or 'Give Me What I Want Liberal or I'll Kill You' are being explored.

-------------------------------------------
IT IS BEST THAT LIBERALS PRACTICE
PRE-EMPTIVE CAPITULATION WHEN DEALING
WITH PEOPLE LIKE THIS
-------------------------------------------

The UH Pre-emptive Capitulation Program is based off of European and American left appeasement programs designed to head off muslim aggression. Recently, a German opera company practiced Pre-emptive Capitulation by canceling their production of "Idomeneo," which at the end of the program had Idomeneo struting around the stage with the chopped heads of Poseidon, Jesus, Buddha and the Prophet Muhammad.

Since muslims will riot or display volatile attitudes if the Prophet Muhammed is displayed in public, as we saw with the muhammed cartoons, the thought of a severed Muhammed head being paraded on stage could invite possible suicide bombers in German cities, or cause copy-kat beheadings of kidnapped German civilians. The Germans pre-emptive capitulation program has taken root and is expected to spread to France, which has not appeased its muslim population as of late for fear of their surrendering to their muslim immigrants. Who would have thought that the Aryan race, sixty odd years following Hitler, would be capitulating to muslims for fear of simply pissing them off.

The UH Pre-emptive Capitulation Program will be refined in the coming months. For instance, new policies of not scheduling exams for muslim students during prayer times. Forcing all UH women to wear burkas, and be escorted by at least one muslim male. Also, muslim students could be exempted from class time to attend terror cell meetings or gatherings designed to orchestrate the downfall of western society. And all muslim students will automatically be given "A's" on their transcripts despite their performance in the classroom.

Pre-emptive Capitulation towards muslims is hear to stay, so deal with it. And forget your right to the First Amendment because both muslims and the ACLU will be all over you unless you capitulate to the muslims right to kill you.

Screw the Godless libs!

A Few Random Thoughts - XXXV

2006-09-27T13:26:00.000-05:00

- Radical liberalism is much worse than anything Christian.

- Clinton was so pissed following Fox's Chris Wallace interview Der Schlick Meister threatened to fire his entire staff.

- With forty-something days to go until the election, gas prices are down, the Stock Market is near all-time highs, consumer confidence is up, unemployment is down, and liberals can't get racism charges to stick.

- How come the liberal media never shows any good news coming from Iraq or Afghanistan? Schools, roads, and hospitals are always being built, our soldiers are training their soldiers, and we hear nothing.

- There are no "honest" liberals.

- Abortion and liberal alternative lifestyles have played hell on the democrat parties future voting base. And liberals still try to blame the GOP.

Liberals Trying to Get Their Stories Straight about Upcoming November Election Loss

2006-09-26T11:43:00.000-05:00

The Cybercast News Service reported yesterday in their news story "America's Voting Machines Still Flawed, Democrat Alleges," that "American voters will still be dissatisfied after this November's mid-term elections," thus setting the liberals up for another disappointing loss come November. Stories about this have been popping up about once or twice a week for a while now.

Of course, you wouldn't be seeing stories like this if the liberals were thinking that they were actually going to win. These stories are being planted now to show a trail of mistrust and deceit in the election system, not to mention that low showing in democrat primaries cannot possibly turn into control of the House much less the Senate.

Somehow, just somehow, everywhere election fraud is taking place in the democrat mind, and its the Republicans fault. Its getting so bad that liberal Congressman Rush Holt, from New Jersey, wants to make sure that you vote democrat with his house bill "aimed at making election results more verifiable." Meaning, he wants to know who you voted for.

Come on, this is 2006. Its not like in the times when democrats were imposing literacy tests and poll taxes on Blacks trying to vote in their White Primaries.

Democrats are the ones cheating in elections. Why do you think that they vote against simply showing some piece of identification just to vote. In society, everyone must carry identification, and not to do so will land you in a world of trouble. The only reason liberals are against showing identifications at elections is because it lessens their guys chances of cheating in elections. Its not about being rich or poor, everyone carries ID, its about being truthful in who you are at election time. Look if the GOP were dishonest at election time, you damn would sure be hearing about it all the time.

The liberals call for a paper trail in elections has never been called for before, but then again, the libs haven't been in such a pinch as they are now, literally on the edge of total destruction, with Blacks fleeing the liberal plantation of intellectual slavery in droves, and the Hispanics not signing up to become democrats despite the wave of summer protest, the tidal wave of despair looms heavy on the liberals and the democrat party.

"Holt called the current [election] system "troublesome" and warned that "we are not ready for 2006." Well the liberals might not be ready, but the GOP damn sure is.

Liberals have to smear in campaigns, that's all they got. They have no issues to run on. Their polls are meaningless. Their attempts to shape public opinion via polling is meaningless. They continue to use an old, pre-internet, pre-90's political playbook, and they continue to believe their own polling numbers.

Screw the Godless libs!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist David Salinas 'Dems Strong in Senate Races' (If libs win; al-Qaeda wins)

2006-09-25T09:38:00.000-05:00

Got to prep for something, so I ain't got much time today.

Bottom line. In al-UH Daily Cougar columnist and resident cotton picker David Mohammed Salinas tripe today, one can imagine him as Hitler in his nearly surrounded Berlin bunker moving ghostly divisions around on a map while still giving the illusion to his peeps that all is well and that they will be saved.

That is the state of the democrat party. Liberalism built on an illusion of lies, and they still believe it.

Screw the Godless libs.

Clinton Combative Trying to Claim He Wanted to Kill UBL in Fox Interview

2006-09-25T08:24:00.000-05:00

I think Fox News Sunday's ratings just went up.

It's starting to slowly get out there that former connoisseur-in-chief of White House blowjobs Bill Clinton threw a hissy fit on "Fox News Sunday" with Anchor Chris Wallace over the weekend.

"In a combative interview on "Fox News Sunday," former President Clinton defended his handling of the threat posed by Osama bin Laden, saying he tried to have bin Laden killed and was attacked for his efforts by the same people who now criticize him for not doing enough." EXCREMENT. TOTAL EXCREMENT.

The interview was conducted during the three-day conference of the "Clinton Global Initiative," a thinktank devoted to coaching young women and girls proper oral sex techniques, so that pervs like Bill can continue to get some.

The combative interview is a result of a man looking for a Presidential legacy, which in the minds of many Americans is ensconced firmly on a blue stained dress with Clinton Presidential semen that should be in that double-wide brothel library in Little Rock.

"They ridiculed me for trying [to kill UBL]," Clinton said, but as we can see in the movie and read in testimony by Clinton aides, Der Schlick Meister was much more interested in oral sex, focus groups, and his poll numbers than he was in getting UBL.

When he was asked "Did you do enough to connect the dots and go after Al Qaida?" "Clinton accused host Chris Wallace of a "conservative hit job" and asked: "I want to know how many people in the Bush administration you asked, 'Why didn't you do anything about the Cole?' I want to know how many people you asked, 'Why did you fire Dick Clarke?'"" Boy, Clinton be pissed. But the Cole happened on his watch, and he didn't do anything about it either.

"Clinton said he "worked hard" to try to kill bin Laden, but we all know that there was something much HARDER he was working with when he sprinkled Monica Lewinsky with his love juice, instead of tending to "official" national affairs.

In the interview Clinton said, "We contracted with people to kill him. I got closer to killing him than anybody's gotten since," but we know when it came to pulling the trigger, that the buck stopped somewhere else down the hall from the Oval Office, and nobody wanted to take responsibility when Clinton wouldn't back them.

Clinton told Wallace, "And you got that little smirk on your face and you think you're so clever, but I had responsibility for trying to protect this country." That right there should have made Wallace break out into laughter.

Over course, on liberal NBC's "Meet the Press," Tim Russert brought his soft ball and Clinton creamed him just like he did Monica Lewinsky.

Screw the Godless libs!

Wal-Mart Says "Shove it" to democrats: Will Sell Generic Drugs for $4

2006-09-21T14:29:00.000-05:00

Boy, you liberals have pissed them off. Wal-Mart, who is being targeted by the democrat party and liberals as an issue this election season is fighting back on all fronts from the flak they have been getting from the Chicago city council all the way up to libs in Congress and the DNC.

The AP Story "Wal-Mart to Sell Generic Drugs for $4," is in response to Wal-Mart not being allowed to build stores in Chicago, being overtaxed in Maryland, and vilified by liberals from the DC, WIN, to the New York Times.

Wal-Mart has been fighting back. Whether it be by building stores one-block outside of Chicago city limits or fighting the liberals in court, and now with the generic drugs plan, the liberals are losing on all fronts. Liberals actually think Wal-Mart will just sit there and take the crap they are getting from the democrat party and the liberals. No way.

Wal-Marts plans to start selling a months supply of generic prescription drugs in the Tampa, Florida area on Friday and spread the liberal fighting concept to the whole state by the end of the year, and to many other states by next year.

As I write this, I'm buying another 100 shares of Wal-Mart just to piss you libs off.

Wal-Mart's program cuts by half as much as six times what other suppliers are charging their customers on nearly 300 commonly prescribed generic drugs, with a savings of 70% expect for most heartland customers. Unfortunately, those living in liberal meccas that refuse to let Wal-Mart in and thus do not share in sales tax revenue, such as Chicago, will be losing out on those customers that need to get their medications and also need to get another handy item which is taxed.

Tough luck liberals. It's just another shot in your foot.

We are Pro-Wal-Mart bloggers.

Screw the Godless libs!

The al-UH Daily Cougar 'The Never Offenders of Islam' (But hell with Christianity -- its OPEN SEASON)

2006-09-19T10:16:00.000-05:00

Be rest assured that the liberals at the al-UH Daily Cougar would never print a muhammad caricature for fear that they might offend al-UH columnist and failed al-Qaeda suicide bomber Adil Saleem, as well as the much feared UH Muslim Students Association.

But hell, with Our Lord Jesus Christ, liberals consider it open season on God at the al-UH Daily Cougar since only one-quarter of all liberals consider themselves to be Worshippers of the Cross.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
Austin Havican is no different among the heavy haired, bearded, and unbathed liberals on the UH campus, except that he expresses his hate for Christianity in cartoon form. Just by looking at him, you can tell he ain't no Christian, and hence we get today's editorial cartoon.

.
.
Screw the Godless libs!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Adil Saleem 'Just Stop Writing Bad Things About Americans' (We know you want to kill us -- so just start w/UH liberals)

2006-09-18T11:16:00.000-05:00

Today we get a good dose of the true side of liberalism and the War on Terror. These people, who hate everything that the United States stands for in its own defense. These people who hate Christianity and adore Islam. These people who if they don't convert will happily be killed by followers of "The Religion of Peace." These people who want to extend a Terrorists Bill of Rights to al-Qaeda bad people who never have heard of Geneva.

The ridiculous idea that the few incidents such as abu ghraib overrule beheadings by al-Qaeda, which the liberals refuse to show yet they push all possible offenses to show the world how bad Americans are in the War on Terror. Do you know that now that Iraqi forces have taken over abu ghraib, the prisoners there now want the US forces back.

Today al-UH Daily Cougar columnist and failed al-Qaeda suicide bomber Adil Saleem expresses his hate for the United States and support for his old buds in al-Qaeda by picking words and sentences and trying his best to use them against President Bush.

My God, liberals like Saleem are more interested in protecting terrorists than protecting American citizens. My guess is he really doesn't care about America at all. In his tripe today "What does Iraq have to do with it?," Adil Saleem, who actually watched the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric last week, cited President Bush as saying, "One of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror."

Big whoops. We are in Iraq. And if the US wasn't there, we would be having to deal with both Iran and Iraq in the future, when both would have been appeased fully functional nuclear weapons on the black market thanks to liberals.

Saleem's assertion that "logical individuals should wonder why connecting Iraq to the war on terror is difficult," is an al-Qaeda friendly statement. Hence his affliation with the party of "reaction" -- the democrat party. Al-Qaeda was at war with the US long before 9/11, but liberals like Adil Saleem what you UH weak minded students to believe it actually started on Bush's watch. Well, the ABC mini-series "The Path to 9/11" settled that and blamed it on Clinton lack of action.

On a day when Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is given an almost angelic appearance on Time's cover magazine, while Conservatives are always potrayed badly on liberal covers. The Time cover shows how America's liberals are trying to be liked by Iran, by al-Qaeda, Hamas, etc., but those are the same people that call for those same liberals death. These people are our enemies and are laughing at us while at the same time plotting to kill us.

The active Presidency of George W. Bush (which offends Saleem) has to be on the offense following the reactive and focus grouped Presidency of Bill Clinton. We can't afford to sit back and let the terrorist strike because, the next time they might use nuclear or chemical weapons, and that will turn everyone against being a dove.

Adil Saleem's insistance that President Bush tie Iraq to 9/11 is crazy. Who cares? Liberals did care about Clinton and Monica Lewinsky. Conservatives don't care about al-Qaeda ties to Iraq. But in time it will be proven. Yes, while Clinton was busy given Monica Lewinsky facials, and at the same time he was being neglectful in killing Bin Laden, yet good 'ol Adil blames Bush for 9/11.

They are connected Saleem, and I will not be intimidated by your statement "the next time you hear a conservative say Saddam Hussein and 9/11 are connected and the U.S. is in Iraq to fight the terrorists who bombed us, calmly point out the facts Bush has stated himself."

Adil Saleem, if you love Allah so much, then go the next step. Don't just write bad things against Americans. Do bad things to the United States. Honestly, if islamo facists were the rulers of the United States, would not gays and liberals be the first to be killed. Well, you are surrounded by gays and liberals at UH. So do your part to get your 72 virgins.

Abraham Lincoln's statement that "A House Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand." Well, we are divided. Saleem, you are a divider, and in the name of Allah -- I call on you to commit suicide. The next GLBT, or Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered meeting on campus will be a good start.

Screw the Godless libs!

NOW Bitch: "Bush Got You Down?"

2006-09-14T08:26:00.000-05:00

How miserable must a person be to title her NOW, or as I call them NAGs, 'Below the Belt' column, "Bush Got You Down?"

Yes, NAG President Kim Gandy is trying to brighten her amazon troops by saying "He's [meaning President George W. Bush] been in the news a lot lately, spreading cheerful [good news]", which Gandy labels as "misinformation," "with the help of his media allies," whom, except maybe FOX, I do not know who they would be?

Gandy continues "in the coming weeks, we have the opportunity to make real change by increasing the number of feminist [amazons] in our government." Fat chance, hell, the latest all women's radion network, comprised of WPMS, WCRY, WDYK, WBCH, have been announced and will have nothing except sewing and cooking, and woman things. Do amazons do any of that stuff? Of course it will go broke like Air America.

Gandy, she is so liberal that she wants insurance to cover birth control of all things. My God, just act responsibly in your one-night stands bitches -- in the spirt of Bill Clinton just give some "head" instead of having sex, or hell, I don't mind lesbian relationships as long as the girls are both hot.

With the NAGs its always abortion. Abortion this and abortion that, the "current Congress has been more invested in criminalizing an aunt or grandmother who might help a niece or granddaughter obtain an abortion in the next state." Good, then maybe we won't have to let so many immigrants. The NAGs have supported the abortion of tens of millions of voters, whom probably most would have been members of the democrat party.

When I say do away with the minimum wage. People are not stupid, and they know how much jobs are worth, Gandy's still insist that in regards to the minimum wage, "we're hard-pressed to find a majority of elected officials who care about anyone's human needs, let alone women's." Again BS coming from the NAG leader.

The minimum wage is just another example of liberals wanting to control peoples lives. Nobody in their right mind will work for $2/hr any more, its not physically possible to work for that amount of money and maintain a living. The minimum wage is just a control knob for the liberals. It's definitely not designed to raise a family on these days.

To show much liberals care about control the poor they voted down a minimum wage increase over the summer. So what if the wage increase was tied to a tax decrease, the fact is that liberals care more about tax increases than they do about minimum wage increases. That's the resolve of liberals -- more money in the liberals pockets now, and no extra money in the poor people pockets later.

And let's face it. If there weren't any poor, who would the liberals constituency be? Inner city blacks have purposely been designed to be kept that way by the liberals, the Jackson's and the Sharpton's, etc. Have you ever heard a message of economic hope come from their mouths that touts economic opportunity by getting your education and increasing your self-esteem -- NO. To them libs, if the government isn't going to do it for you, then nobody is.

The same goes for the Hispanic community. You have to lift yourself up by your own bootstraps. Nobody in the liberal community ever stresses saving for your own future. Open a savings account, watch the power of compound interest, save.

The NAGs can go ahead and express joy at the few successes of their amazon candidates last Tuesday, but when November rolls around they will be giving out the same story as last election. "We gave it a shot, buy came up short."

Screw the Godless libs!

Former Clinton Aide: Path to 9/11 Was Very, Very Accurate

2006-09-13T11:33:00.000-05:00

Their crapping their pants folks. Yes liberals, those of the democrat party, are crapping their pants, and they are crying like stuck pigs.

In a recent AgapePress story "Former Clinton Aide Critical of Attempts to Shut Down ABC's 9/11 Special," reporter Chad Groening interviewed a former Clinton aide who carried the nuclear football, and was duty-bound to be by the President's side at all times during his shifts as Clinton's military attaché.

Yes, "retired Air Force Lt. Col. Buzz Patterson says his former boss had several chances to nab terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden."

"The Path to 9/11" which was "lambasted by the former Chief Executive and his advisers was, in fact, very accurate." Thankfully very little was cut from the movie, and really showed the real Clinton Administration minus the SPIN.

ABC labeled "The Path to 9/11" as fictionalized following the first night, and a docudrama following the second night. President Bush's speech on the second night was "right on," and liberals in showing their disgust for his speech, are showing the American people how they are further aligning themselves with al-Qaeda.

Thank God some Republicans with balls are starting to label those in the democrat party as terrorists sympathizers rather than American defenders. We need more of that GOP speak.

Have any liberals condemned al-Qaeda? Have liberals ever condemned the beheadings of Americans?

No, liberals defend the treatment of al-Qaeda prisoners. Liberals are concerned about detainees getting their korans, their islamic prepared meals, and ensuring that detainees make it to prayer sessions on time. While at the same time liberals ensure that every publicly displayed Bible and Ten Commandments is pulled from the sight of just one offended person.

"The 9/11 Commission Report" and other sources were the inspiration for the movie. Everyone knows the events of that fateful day, but many were unaware of the events that lead up to the Twin Towers. Now they know. They events were presented in a fair and truthful manner, in a way that heartlanders will dispute despite what the liberal media throws at them.

I'm growing more and more confident about a GOP sweep in November. Americans are starting to awake from their electoral slumber and starting to pay attention to really whats going on out there. Its incredible that some liberals still actually believe that President Bush actually blew up the WTC and instructed the terrorist controlled planes to fly straight into them.

There are alot of sick members of the democrat party out their. They forsook the Black vote, and now the "Larry X" types as shown in a recent story are abandoning the democrat party in droves. They are about the very few instead of the many. Hence my confidence is building and building rapidly.

Col. Patterson is certain that if Clinton would have acted just once (in like eight times Bill had a chance to get UBL) the events such as the "the bombings of the embassies in Africa" and "the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole." Patterson also said, "I think President Bill Clinton is responsible for 9/11 and the war on terror, personally. That is his legacy." And don't forget that blowjobs are Clinton's legacy too.

Screw the Godless libs!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist David Salinas 'A Kool-Aid Believer in liberalism' (Concerned about GOP using liberal speak as weapon in November)

2006-09-12T11:27:00.000-05:00

All hail the great perpetual believer of liberalism, wacko David Salinas!

Just think, by this time next year al-UH Daily Cougar columnist and resident cotton picker David Mohammed Salinas will probably be unemployed and thinking that he might have a shot at the local Burger King if he posts his political science degree on his application.

My God Salinas is a loon. In his tripe "Negative campaign unneeded," Salinas insist that the liberals are "poised to take control of the House and with an outside shot at the Senate." Obviously, Salinas hasn't been reading liberal rags lately that suggest that the democrat party is in trouble come November. Stories in the LA Times, NY Times, The Hill, the Philadelphia Inquirer and even a Zobgy poll shows Santorum surging in Pennsylvania. I suppose, when you drink too much kool-aid such as David has, he'll support the democrat party and its nullity where the buck stops down the hall and not in the Clinton oval orifice.

David Mohammed Salinas is worried that with time dwindling in the 2006 campaign "Republicans have pledged to spend millions "going negative," and that fully 90% of the fifty million dollar ad budget is to be spent "exclusively on negative ads."

Mohammed's claim that "one part of the coming negative blitz will deal with the preposterous notion that voting Democratic somehow weakens the security of this country." Mohammed who are you kidding man? UBL practically endorses the democrat party, and I still stand-by my claim that if the liberals ever regain power that we can expect a nuclear, biological, or dirty bomb within just a few years of them taking the reigns.

Let me ask you a question Mohammed. If you were in charge of our nation's security, would terrorism still be treated "as a law enforcement problem." Would terrorists be given an equal opportunity to kill innocent American kids or would you act in defense only after the fact.

Folks we can't trust David Mohammed Salinas to secure his own dorm room and personal effects, and he wants the liberals to be in charge of our national security.

Salinas is so desperate that he berates the ABC movie "The Path to 9/11," which displayed that the War on Terror in no way started on 9/11/2001, but that it was Clinton inaction (due to vane attempts to maintain his poll numbers) during the 1990's that emboldened the terrorists to actually go thru with attacking the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

Salinas chides Vice President Cheney, who ate Tim Russert's lunch on Meet the Press last Sunday. Now for someone who professes peace and liberalism, Salinas has an unyielding hate for Dick Cheney.

Salinas desperation continues with the Iranian-American and "Path to 9/11" writer Cyrus Nowrasteh, whom he calls "the radical right's less successful version of Michael Moore." Yes, while the Bush Administration can withstand the worthless "Fahrenheit 9/11", the Clinton Administration cannot withstand a 5-hr truthful mini-series about 1990's counterterrorism efforts.

David Salinas is so stupid, he writes "if you don't believe the film was intended to distort the truth, then explain why no changes were made to the film until former members of the Clinton administration got wind of the details."

Did President Bush call Michael Moore and demand "Fahrenheit 9/11" be changed? Yet Mohammed's eye-brows don't even get a rise when Bill Clinton calls Bob Iger over at ABC demanding that "The Path to 9/11" be cancelled entirely. That's how blind liberals are to the truth, they run and hide, and demand that things "get cancelled."

To David Mohammed Salinas liberalism is his religion and Bill Clinton is his God.

In Salinas' mind, Clinton can do no wrong. Liberals can do no wrong. If this were WWII Salinas would be a blind follower of Adolf Hitler in his bunker in Berlin, only realizing the errorof his ways when Hitler kills himself. And of course, that's too late. That's the path that the liberals and David Mohammed Salinas are leading us down -- the complete path to destruction just as Berlin was destroyed in WWII.

Mohammed's assertion that "this election cycle is the American public is not buying the argument that only Republicans can keep the country safe," is that -- just another lie. When the liberal media spreads complete negative coverage of war efforts, what do you expect from the uninformed public.

Mohammed tries to trick the UH weak minded student. He touts that some 41 democrat war veterans are running for office. Of course he doesn't mention that most if not all of those democrats are against US efforts in the War on Terror. He even found one female amputee in Illinois who is against the war and is running for office. I wouldn't trust democrat veteran candidates as far as I could thrown them.

GOP efforts in their campaign ads this November will be nothing more than Republicans using 'liberal speak' against the democrat party. But of course David Mohammed Salinas will call that negative. Yes, the crazy words of the liberals at their anti-war rallies, abortion events, etc, will be used against them, and the GOP will not say one thing.

David Mohammed Salinas desperation will grow as September rolls into November. The GOP will be accused of the most brutal crimes, the liberals will be hailed as saviors of the world, al-Qaeda will be welcomed as a friend, while American troops will be portrayed as the scourge of the Earth.

That's liberalism for you.

Screw the Godless libs!

September 11th ' A day in history that liberals will never want to remember' (Why? Because liberal political correctness and wimpyness caused this)

2006-09-11T09:46:00.000-05:00

From 1993 to 2000, there were about 30 terrorist attacks, and the worthless Clinton Administration DID NOTHING because of Monica Lewinsky, and not wanting to look warlike to the world.

Fuck you liberals! Fuck you and your political correctness. Fuck you and your love for the enemy. Fuck you and your hate for the United States. Fuck you and your hate for President Bush.

To all non-liberals -- LET'S ROLL.

Fuck the Godless libs!

Path to 9/11 'If ABC Cowers to Stalinists Liberals' (The current DVD version will surface on the Net)

2006-09-09T00:02:00.000-05:00

The ABC movie "The Path to 9/11" which is set to air on Sunday (9/10) and Monday (9/11) nights, is full of controversy about how the worthless Clinton Administration of the 1990's let OBL slip away when they had him in their crosshairs and let him go, which eventually lead to 9/11.

ABC released a DVD of the movie to influentual media personnel about a week ago, and a pre-screening was shown to a bunch of liberals in DC last week as well. Thank God Rush Limbaugh also received a copy so the truth can be commented on.

The liberal showing started the liberal outrage, because evidently Clinton, nor Albright were not given pre-release DVDs. That might be ABCs saving grace for going ahead with running the movie this Sunday, or even from altering the movie so much as to put blame on the Clinton Administration. Hints of alteration may spark outrage as big as the rathergate scandal of several years ago.

We will know the morning of September 11th when Conservative Media goes on the air if ABC cowered to the stalinists liberals and made any significant alterations to the movie. If the movie is altered it will be like being attacked on 9/11 again -- this time by the liberals themselves. If liberals can't take any criticism then they shouldn't be in the spotlight.

Even with the liberals threatening ABC television and radio station licenses, ABC has no choice but to call the liberals bluff, which is tantamount to foregoing KGB directives. I will support ABC if they say "screw you" to the democrat party. But if they cower to the liberals, I'm going to take them off my TV favorites altogether.

To show how flimsy the foundation of the liberal legacy since the 1990s is, that they can't stand to have a 5-hr movie shown about them. Here is a recent letter by Senate stalinists democrat leaders forcing ABC to cancel the "Path to 9/11" miniseries. The letter is signed by Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, Assistant Democratic Leader Dick Durbin, and Senators Debbie Stabenow, Charles Schumer, and Byron Dorgan.

##################

September 7, 2006

Mr. Robert A. Iger
President and CEO
The Walt Disney Company
500 South Buena Vista Street
Burbank CA 91521

Dear Mr. Iger,

We write with serious concerns about the planned upcoming broadcast of The Path to 9/11 mini-series on September 10 and 11. Countless reports from experts on 9/11 who have viewed the program indicate numerous and serious inaccuracies that will undoubtedly serve to misinform the American people about the tragic events surrounding the terrible attacks of that day. Furthermore, the manner in which this program has been developed, funded, and advertised suggests a partisan bent unbecoming of a major company like Disney and a major and well respected news organization like ABC. We therefore urge you to cancel this broadcast to cease Disney’s plans to use it as a teaching tool in schools across America through Scholastic. Presenting such deeply flawed and factually inaccurate misinformation to the American public and to children would be a gross miscarriage of your corporate and civic responsibility to the law, to your shareholders, and to the nation.

The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest. Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in the duty of broadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting an open and accurate discussion of political ideas and events.

Disney and ABC claim this program to be based on the 9/11 Commission Report and are using that assertion as part of the promotional campaign for it. The 9/11 Commission is the most respected American authority on the 9/11 attacks, and association with it carries a special responsibility. Indeed, the very events themselves on 9/11, so tragic as they were, demand extreme care by any who attempt to use those events as part of an entertainment or educational program. To quote Steve McPhereson, president of ABC Entertainment, "When you take on the responsibility of telling the story behind such an important event, it is absolutely critical that you get it right."

Unfortunately, it appears Disney and ABC got it totally wrong.

Despite claims by your network’s representatives that The Path to 9/11 is based on the report of the 9/11 Commission, 9/11 Commissioners themselves, as well as other experts on the issues, disagree.

Richard Ben-Veniste, speaking for himself and fellow 9/11 Commissioners who recently viewed the program, said, "As we were watching, we were trying to think how they could have misinterpreted the 9/11 Commission’s findings the way that they had." ["9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased," New York Times, September 6, 2006]
Richard Clarke, the former counter-terrorism czar, and a national security advisor to ABC has described the program as "deeply flawed" and said of the program's depiction of a Clinton official hanging up on an intelligence agent, "It’s 180 degrees from what happened." ["9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased," New York Times, September 6, 2006]
Reports suggest that an FBI agent who worked on 9/11 and served as a consultant to ABC on this program quit halfway through because, "he thought they were making things up." [MSNBC, September 7, 2006]
Even Thomas Kean, who serves as a paid consultant to the miniseries, has admitted that scenes in the film are fictionalized. ["9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased," New York Times, September 6, 2006]

That Disney would seek to broadcast an admittedly and proven false recounting of the events of 9/11 raises serious questions about the motivations of its creators and those who approved the deeply flawed program. Finally, that Disney plans to air commercial-free a program that reportedly cost it $40 million to produce serves to add fuel to these concerns.

These concerns are made all the more pressing by the political leaning of and the public statements made by the writer/producer of this miniseries, Mr. Cyrus Nowrasteh, in promoting this miniseries across conservative blogs and talk shows.
Frankly, that ABC and Disney would consider airing a program that could be construed as right-wing political propaganda on such a grave and important event involving the security of our nation is a discredit both to the Disney brand and to the legacy of honesty built at ABC by honorable individuals from David Brinkley to Peter Jennings. Furthermore, that Disney would seek to use Scholastic to promote this misguided programming to American children as a substitute for factual information is a disgrace.

As 9/11 Commission member Jamie Gorelick said, "It is critically important to the safety of our nation that our citizens, and particularly our school children, understand what actually happened and why – so that we can proceed from a common understanding of what went wrong and act with unity to make our country safer."

Should Disney allow this programming to proceed as planned, the factual record, millions of viewers, countless schoolchildren, and the reputation of Disney as a corporation worthy of the trust of the American people and the United States Congress will be deeply damaged. We urge you, after full consideration of the facts, to uphold your responsibilities as a respected member of American society and as a beneficiary of the free use of the public airwaves to cancel this factually inaccurate and deeply misguided program. We look forward to hearing back from you soon.

Sincerely,

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid
Assistant Democratic Leader Dick Durbin
Senator Debbie Stabenow
Senator Charles Schumer
Senator Byron Dorgan

##################

People, since the democrat party has built its foundation on lies, it really hurts them when the truth hits. I expect ABC to hold firm to their part of the deal, and if they don't, I don't think the liberals should expect to win anything in November.

Screw the Godless libs!

Check out the newest Democrat Party Weekly Paper

2006-09-08T20:52:00.000-05:00

Check it out here.

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Denise Hewitt 'Shows No Concern for Victims of Violent Crime' (Only cares about rising cost of the Death Penalty)

2006-09-07T09:59:00.000-05:00

I once asked a liberal who hated the second amendment (for you UH weak minded students, that the Constitutional amendment that allows us to keep and bear arms) what he would do if a person was about to stab his wife and he had a gun in his hand. Essentially, the liberal would have allowed his wife to die.

We have seen it over and over again with liberals. The have no concern for the victim and a growing and forgiving respect for the killer.

A good example would be the beheading of American civilian Nick Berg in Iraq. (I've shown his beheading picture on this blog many times). His father Michael Berg is so liberal that he calls Bush the terrorist and embraces the real killers of his beheaded Son, and now he's running for Congress while trampling on the memory of his son just as Mother Sheehan did her son.

So goes it with al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Denise E. Hewitt who has only regurgitated the crap that her liberal professors and textbooks have told her, and has never formed any real opinions herself.

In her tripe today "Capital punishment raises questions," Hewitt mourns the long ago executions of gang leader and murderer Ruben Montoya Cantu and of auto mechanic and arsonist Cameron Willingham.

Cantu, as a gang leader, was involved in robbery and besides all the other people he probably killed, Cantu was convicted for the murder of Pedro Gomez and attempted murder of Juan Moreno back in the early 80's.

Cameron Willingham's death sentence was for the murder of his three kids when he set his house on fire in the early 1990's.

No matter the circumstances, liberalism, with its drive-by mentality shows absolutely no concern for the victims of violent crime. Liberals only show compassion for the person sentenced to die. And for liberal choice that Hewitt loving sides with those who kill rather than be killed.

Hewitt takes to her bleeding heart "the Houston Chronicle has presented a compelling case for Cantu's innocence, and the "expert testimony" that helped convict Willingham has been called into serious question," while not once in her tripe today did she mention the words "victim" or "family."

I don't doubt that a few men may have been executed on false testimony, but it is not a reason to put to punish the death penalty system as a whole.

Denise cites from her textbook that "capital punishment has evolved from public hangings in town squares to sterile and secluded execution chambers deep within prison complexes." She actually thinks that Cantu shouldn't have been executed, no matter how many victims and family members lives he's ruined.

Hewitt is so liberal that just because one person may have been wrongly executed that the whole process should be scrapped. She bites at the reasons for the death penalty, but even beneath that to Hewitt it comes down to cost.

Hewitt's concern is for the money that is tied up in appeals for years. Why, because it is not being spent on some stupid liberal social program that hands out condoms to pre-teens while showing them how to properly use them. To Hewitt, the families of murder victims are nothing. Families are not in the headlines; they're unseen.

Denise urges that if you are going to kill someone do it in Brazoria County. "Harris County accounts for 136 out of 396 people currently on death row, compared to neighboring Brazoria County's two," so your chances of being sentenced to death in Brazoria County are greatly reduced. The finances of cash strapped counties have DA's not pursuing the death penalty. Well maybe its time that we have a telethon that raises money for DA's across the state so that they can pursue more death penalty cases.

Thankfully Hewitt admits that "committing a heinous murder in Harris County almost guarantees a capital murder trial," and its unfortunate that "the same murder committed elsewhere in Texas may 'only' mean life in prison."

Unlike Hewitt, I am for "equal punishment" for the crime. That does not mean "life" in prison for a capital murder, it means that the murderer should be executed, and executed in a timely fashion. The death penalty does bring closure for the family of a murder victim.

About the only time I would agree with a "life" sentence in a murder case would be for the person who murders Denise E. Hewitt. That is equal punishment for the crime.

Screw the Godless libs!

No. 5 of 10 Things to Do With the al-UH Daily Cougar Besides Read It

2006-09-06T09:23:00.000-05:00

5. Make a head cover out of it when you forgot your umbrella in your car.

Biblical Scholars Calculate for UN Nuclear Destruction This Month

2006-09-06T00:19:00.000-05:00

The building is falling apart, but before it collapses on its own, biblical scholars have calculated that the UN building in NYC will undergo nuclear destruction this month.

YEEAAHHHH!!!!

And its in a Blue State too!!!

YEEAAHHHH!!!!

Screw the Godless libs!

UH's al-WIN on Channel 11's 5 o'clock Newscast

2006-09-05T17:33:00.000-05:00

Channel 11's story "Couric in anchor chair inspiring more women to become journalists," featured al-WIN during their 5 o'clock newscast today.

Good 'ol al-WIN reporter Matt Dougherty of a "A Day in the Life of a Male Prostitute" was shown in Karla Barguiarena's piece doing a video report, probably on horse meat processing or something.

We look forward to more video news stories from al-WIN this semester. Who can forget all the great Wal-Mart bashing and prostitution enlightenment they've reported on in the past. It makes for good viewing.

Screw the Godless libs!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Colin Ferguson 'Exposing More Government Secrets' (Proudly helping al-Qaeda get the upper hand)

2006-09-05T09:35:00.000-05:00

I've maintainted that if the liberals ever regain power that we can expect some type of nuclear attack on American soil within 3-5 years. Now I'm begining to believe that even if the libs don't regain power, that just such an attack will still occur but with the help of the liberals themeselves. That's the resolve of those selfish people who want to have total power in this country.

Just as liberals (have seen themselves and) have been silent on the Mexican 2000 type elections with Felipe Calderon now declared the winner over the childish leftist liberal Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who actions as of late have all reminded us of Algore, liberals will do everything in their power to kill Conservative leadership. The only leadership capable of defeating and not appeasing terrorism.

Today's opinion page brings us another child. Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Colin K. Ferguson, who is afraid that the FBI might find out something about his financial background. Maybe, when he worked as a waitress at a gay bar, he might have not reported all his tip money. Who knows?

In his tripe today "FBI investigation should worry students," Colin Ferguson, UH's own Chicken Little, is trying to cause a little fuss over an FBI program trying to weed out terrorists in our liberal institutions. Evidently those FSFSA applications we fill out each year were being mined for data that might help the FBI find suspects under investigation. GOOD!

Why do liberals like Colin feel that every government secret needs to be exposed. Does he think that al-Qaeda doesn't watch al-CNN?
Ferguson quotes the FBI that "terrorists have exploited programs involving student visas and financial aid," and crticizes the FBI program Operation Strikeback, which was used to mine the Department of Education data.

What gets me, is that the FBI probably has never touch anyones records unless they were under suspicion and had an arabic sounding name.

No one really wants to see records of liberals, especially that of liberal journalist Laura McGann, who besides being mentioned in Ferguson's tripe today also refuses to shave her armpits.

It was McGann who "found the information on the FBI searches after seeing in a Government Accountability Office report that the Department of Education had been doing its share for the war on terror." McGann filed FOIA requests, did interviews, and received informaton on the program, which thankfully much much of the information was redacted, so that liberals like McGann couldn't inform al-Qaeda.

Of all the information collected by the FBI my guess would be less than one-percent of one-percent were actually pulled. Look, unless a terrorist is under investigation no government agency need not waist time and money looking at records randomly.

Ferguson's lack of concern for US government secrecy should dumbfound the UH weak minded student. His thinking that leaves "all students [applying for financial aid] to wonder if they were selected" is ridiculous.

Are liberals so arrogant to think that the government wants to know everything about them? My God, I don't want to know anything about stinking, leftist bent liberals. Especially when their every thought is the complete destruction of the American way.

While the US must leave no stone unturned in the hunt for terrorists in our midst, Ferguson is pissed that "the secretary of education is pushing for a new system that would allow the federal government to track college students throughout their entire academic careers with a comprehensive sort of transcript database called "unit records."" GOOD!

Ferguson just doesn't get it. His instance that the FBI "be forthright" with sensitive information that would give the terrorists heads-up on our plans is mindboggling.

Colin K. Ferguson, whose side are you on? Obviously, you would rather search old grandmas on airline flights than terrorists. You would want as many secret programs "outed" so that the terrorist can do something else to harm and evade authorities. Again, whose side are you on?

I hope that the FBI has has the good sense to continue the program under a different name to track student information, and that liberals like you never find out about it. Because if libs do find out -- al-Qaeda automatically knows.

Screw the Godless libs!

Expect UH Terrorist Attack by Auto Someday from Frustrated Islamo Facist on UH Infidels

2006-09-01T08:32:00.000-05:00

The liberal "drive-by" media doesn't want to admit it, but we are under attack by frustrated islamo facist auto terrorist. The most recent attack happened in the Western liberal mecca of San Francisco when Jews came under attack from frustrated islamic auto terrorist "deliberately drove into lots of people and murdered at least one, critically injuring many others" until it ended near a SF Jewish Community Center.

Apparently it was hard to retrieve the SF motorist name, which turned out to be Omeed Aziz Popal.

Popal is a liberal media best friend -- an islamo facist, who called himself a terrorist in police custody, but of course that was downplayed by SFPD. But yell terrorist in an airport, and hey, it will land you in jail.

So what is the official 'big excuse' for the murder of "non-Muslims: He was upset over the start of his stressful arranged Islamic marriage." It's such a crock.

Debbie Schlussel points out that the "Religion of Peace" is "displaying yet more 'Peace.'" We American Infidels had better get on the ball, or sooner or later these peace loving frustrated islamic facists drivers will be including fertilizer or dirty nuclear bombs along with their frustrated driving habits.

Now on the UH campus, it is going to be pretty easy to spot a potential frustrated islamic facist auto terrorist.
Here are a few examples of what they might look like:

The frustrated islamo facist auto terrorist might also look like this:
a

Potential UH attacks will probably come on a Monday or Tuesday, on test days, or near Christian holidays. The frustrated islamo facist auto terrorist will use a small economical environmentally friendly car, probably green, so as not to draw suspicion in a sea of potential liberal victims at UH.

The only way to avoid attack from a frustrated islamo facist auto terrorist is to make your way around campus during islamic prayer times. A daily islamic prayer schedule can be found at this Islamic Agenda website. To be on the safe side, you might want to contact the UH Muslim Students Association to determine what 'method of calculation' they use to determine prayer times on the UH campus, or even simply ask the UHMSA when the next frustrated islamo facist auto terrorist is scheduled to strike. If they don't tell you, simply tell them the liberal line -- "it's not fair that you are not sharing this information."

The San Francisco incident is not alone. Incredibly, this past March, a University of North Carolina frustrated islamic auto terrorist, Mohammed Reza Taheri-Azar, who loves Allah and of course hates America, lovingly and peacefully "drove his Jeep into students at the University of North Carolina." This past Christmas, Ali R. Warrayat, who loves Allah, but of course hates America and Santa Clause "drove his car into a Home Depot in Arizona, for the purpose of mass destruction of the store and those in it. He wanted to set the place ablaze" in a loving and peaceful way.

A little closer to home in Texas, Dr. Wameeth Fadhli, actually in Dickinson, took an example from our bro's in the hood and did a drive-by "random" shooting of a bicyclist; while in Baltimore, Mujtaba Rabbani Jabbar, who in the name of the Religion of Peace shot and killed a Jewish customer at a movie palace. And finally, in the liberal home of bad coffee, Seattle, frustrated islamic facist auto terrorist Naveed Haq went on a shooting spree at the Jewish Federation killing at least one person.

UH, don't say I didn't warn you. Campus liberalism is no protection against frustrated islamo facist auto terrorist. In fact, if the islamo facist ever gain power in US government, liberals will be the first to be exterminated just as the Jews were under Hitler in WWII.

Hattip to Debbie Schlussel.

Screw the libs!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Remembers Hurricane Katrina - Day 3 (Al-DC somehow compares Katrina disaster to Israel's target selection against Hezbos)

2006-08-31T09:52:00.000-05:00

Only a female history major that hasn't seen or done crap in her life can put together some tripe that compares Hurricane Katrina and the Israeli conflict against the Hezbos.

In her tripe today Israel should learn from U.S. mistakes," Denise E. Hewitt takes time to belatedly mark "the first anniversary of the catastrophe that left the world watching helplessly as hundreds of thousands of people tried to escape the oncoming wrath of Hurricane Katrina," while at the same time Hewitt condemns Israel for protecting itself against islamo facism Hezbos.

What the hell would prompt this? Can she being seeing our good friend Adil Saleem, and wants to make a good impression by being a good anti-semite?

So what did Israel really do that pissed Hewitt off? Evidently, in the sick mind of Denise Hewitt the country that is defending itself from agression must evacuate all enemy non-combatants, especially those enemy non-combatants that are specifically designed to be enemy human shields, and when those human shield enemy non-combatants are killed they are to be paraded on international television. Since Israel did not do that, Hewitt is taking matters into her own hands, and making a fool of herself in the meantime.

My God, "School Bus" Nagin left over a thousand New Orleans school buses in their parking lots only to be flooded, instead of using those same school buses to evacuate the poor of New Orleans. No, Hewitt doesn't criticize "School Bus" Nagin and the liberal utopian leadership of New Orleans. Instead, Denise goes after the liberal, yes, liberal leadership of Israel, who in lieu of squashing the enemy Hezbos, have set themselves up for further war when the Hezbos are rearmed by Iran under the protection of the United Nations umbrella.

Hewitt's assessment of how Israel conducted themselves is pure poppycock. She writes "Israel chose to bomb almost exclusively civilian targets from airports to apartment buildings. They made the decision to take innocent human lives not as a force of nature but as a force of revenge," which of course is a crock. Where else was Israel suppose to bomb except where the enemy was.

Do the Hezbos even have an official uniform they wear in battle?

Hewitt swallows the Hezbo line about civilian casualities hook line and sinker as if she was servicing Lex Steele herself. Denise never criticizes the Hezbos firing of thousands of rockets at Israeli civilian targets, nor does she criticize the Hezbos for kidnapping Israeli soldiers, which started the conflict in the first place.

That's liberalism for you. It's unfortunate that in a few years, Denise E. Hewitt will be teaching our children in some form or fashion.

Hewitt you can write all about how Israel is the agressor, and how "there were no surgical strikes to take out selected high-value targets." Or that, "the same [Israeli] pamphlets that warned the Lebanese to evacuate warned that anyone traveling by pickup truck would be assumed to be transporting arms and fired upon."

Hewitt shows just how stupid liberalism is when she shows more concern for the death of Hezbo kids, when liberal Americans abort 4,000 fetuses per day, and over 2,300 American kids are killed in auto accidents per year. Hewitt's silence on those subjects is defining, but if the Israelis accidentally kill a few Hezbo human shield kids, she goes off the deep end.

Well Denise E. Hewitt, you unpatriotic slut, you've had your 15 minutes of fame to implant the seeds of Israel's so-called misdeeds into the minds of UH weak-minded students. Go back into your cubby hole and resume your meaningless liberal life.

Screw the libs!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Remembers Hurricane Katrina - Day 2

2006-08-30T09:52:00.000-05:00

I'm out of town this a.m. for a funeral, so I am unable to retrieve a hardcopy of the al-UH Daily Cougar, but I have my computer with me and a wireless connection so I can always stay in touch and get needed information.

I was checking out Jong Soo Lee's sports story "Cougars prepare for first road game of '06: UH travels to Denton to face North Texas Mean Green and dangerous forward Heather Hutyra," and it was about mid-story before anyone reading could make any determination of what sport good 'ol Jong was talking about, and even then, you would still have to make an internet search or two to confirm it, since soccer is not even in the story.

Since I am a soccer fan and actually have a schedule, I knew that the Lady Cougs would be in Denton on Thursday, but the average al-DC reader would still be guessing "what is good 'ol Jong talking about?"

Next time, we can all hope that the al-DC Sports Editor Chris Elliott oversees good 'ol Jong so that he applies the five (5) W's (who, what, why, where, when) in his sports journalism, so the average al-DC reader won't have to waist their time guessing.

Screw the libs!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Remembers Hurricane Katrina

2006-08-29T09:27:00.000-05:00

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist David McLard 'The Sky is Falling' (Please rally behind Al Gore to save the world)

2006-08-28T09:40:00.000-05:00

We haven't been on campus two full weeks and already al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist David Lee McClard's has ruined his semester by actually believing Algore's slideshow "An Inconvenient Truth." And don't forget Algore's father voted AGAINST everything Civil Rights, so we know that Algore's whole life is based on a lie.

In his tripe today "And you thought Heidi Klum was hot," which probably wouldn't even get a gander if the name Heidi Klum wasn't in the title because you won't see her name in the article proper, McClard praises Algore for being bold to expose the horror of global warming.

Algore and McClard can spout all the tripe they want, but they will never herald the real cause of global warming. Hmm! I wonder what it can be? No, liberals will try and tell us man is the sole heir to the problem and scare us to death in order to get our votes and change the way we live.

McClard was careful not to blame anyone in his tripe today. Was man responsible for the Little Ice Age? McClard and Algore would probably say "yes." Man was alive wasn't he. To liberals, man is always to blame, and only government (liberal government mind you) can come in and solve the problem.

The Earth cleans herself. Following the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo, the volcano sent more VOCs into the air at one time than man has ever created since the beginning of the industrial revolution. The Earth only cooled one-half degree.

Our best weather forecasters can't tell us the weather more than a week out, and you want me to believe Algore and his tripe on global warming. It's proven fact that the Earth warms and cools in cycles, but to put complete blame on man is totally ridiculous. In the Age of the Dinosaurs, the Earth's temperatures were 40% higher than they were today. I don't know what caused that, perhaps not enough volcanoes were erupting or not enough comets were pelting the Earth, so the atmosphere was much more clear letting in more sun, but that was solved 65 million years ago.

The cold scientific fact about Algore and David Lee McClard is that they are both full of crap.

Screw the libs!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist David McLard 'It's OK to Search Airline Passengers' (As long as terrorists aren't offended)

2006-08-24T09:26:00.000-05:00

At first glance looking at al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist David Lee McClard's tripe today "Defending country requires effort," you might get the sense that he is serious about defending the country against the next al-Qaeda attack.

Well he is -- until a potential terrorist gets offended.

McClard relays how we have all heard of the new stepped up security measures due to "foiled terrorist plot in Britain," and how "cookies and ballpoint pens" are being confiscated, "babies being frisked and Bibles being forced into overstuffed luggage."

Those measures may sound extreme, but hell we are at war. At war with peaceful religious people who just want to kill all US infidel's -- liberals included.

McClard chides President Bush for taking "credit for stymieing potential harm to our nation," while praising al-Qaeda as "an enemy that thinks in terms of decades," knowing full well that American liberals want the public to forget 9/11 and get back to a pre-9/11 mentality, so that liberals can retake the House and Senate in the November elections.

McClard quotes author Ron Suskind, who is no friend of the White House, as saying we must not compromises on "those things that make us distinctive as a democracy and distinctive in terms of the long human pageant." In other words, no racial profiling. As for McClard, terrorists must be given an equal opportunity in America to strike against us at any time or place that they wish. It is after all -- the liberal (or progressive) thing to do.

McClard continues that "Homeland Security Chairman Peter King said airport screeners should put political correctness aside and investigate all Middle Eastern and South Asian people outright. He said they were consistently the ones who hijacked planes, so they should be singled out."

Of course McClard violently objects, stating "this flies in the face of the pillars of our society: freedom, equality and legitimate law enforcement," and is against the objective of the American Left to a pre-9/11 mentality and allow our country to be further invaded by these non-infedels.

I'm sorry David Lee, what would you rather have -- downtown Houston and UH unihabital for years because of a dirty nuclear bomb, or some "foreigners with dark skin" profiled. Look Israel's El Al Airline has been profiling for years and they have yet to have an incident.

Profiling is a sad fact, but it must be done. It must be done for the survival of our children, and our country. All this politically correct BS is flying in the face of reality, and we will sooner or later be burned, and be burned bad. Hell, I'm still amazed we are still letting muslims into this country. It is a price that Europe is now paying, and sooner or later, we will have to step up to the checkout counter.

Muslims are unyielding in their religion, and if they hate us so, why do they even come here. On top of that, liberals clamp on to islam as a religious savior when they disregard Christianity as worthless. I thought liberals considered all religion worthless, except the church of liberalism itself.

McClard dream of "offense proof" screening measure such as walk-through X-ray machines a long off, and utopian ideas "hygienic cavity searches" by physicians on-hand and that "convenient searches would take place in curtained cubicles much like the ones already used at airports but would be more spacious" are long off or may never materialize. That's liberal thinking for you.

Incredibly, David Lee McClard oozes his liberal thoughts when he writes "the greatest threat to any flight is the very consciousness of a would-be terrorist. Acting on this core threat, security officials should put in place a comprehensive sedation measure to ensure that, even granted boarding, a would-be terrorist would not be conscious for the flight itself." Why the hell would liberals even think of letting the "would-be terrorist" on board in the first place, much less sediating the guy.

Wouldn't that take away the "would-be terrorist" liberal civil rights? After all it "flies in the face of the pillars of our society: freedom, equality and legitimate law enforcement?"

Screw the libs!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Hasan Rizvi 'Only GOP are Racists' (Does not comment on Hillary Clinton racist joke about Mahatma Gandhi)

2006-08-23T10:18:00.000-05:00

Al-UH Daily Cougar Macaca Columnist Hasan Rizvi was deeply saddened when the al-Qaeda UK terror plot to blow up planes bound for the US from the UK failed.

Rizvi was scheduled to participate in the chemical transport test on his return trip to Houston from London and report back to London as to its effectiveness. But alas he was forced to return empty tubed and now he feels a sense of dishonor. So UH Conservatives, watchout, there may be a suicide bomber in your midst this semester.

So who does Rizvi retaliate against because the Brits got his al-Qaeda crew? He goes off on Virginia GOP Sen. George Allen for his little "Macaca" comment, all the while knowing that his beloved Hillary Clinton can tell her little "Mahatma Gandhi" jokes and get away free as a liberal bird.

In his tripe today "Senator continues racist behavior," Rizvi details all the so-called racists history of Sen. Allen and praises the liberal American of Indian decent who was the cause of the comment, whom he calls just as American as Sen. Allen. I think not -- he's liberal isn't he, and probably holds India in higher regard than the United States, just after the religion of liberalism itself.

Look, we are all racist in some way. Sometimes things slip, but we should not be crucified for it. What I'm complaining about is the racism that liberals portray that is not reported in the liberal media.

For instance, an India Post commentary "Hillary Clinton's Gandhi 'Joke' is clearly racist," tells of Hillary Rodham Clinton equating Mahatma Gandhi to "working at a gas station in St. Louis," which is "clearly racist, stereotypical, as many South Asians do run gas stations in the US." "After Clinton made that sick remark there was laughter. Nobody from the Democratic group objected. Nobody frowned at Hillary Clinton. Nobody protested." And of course al-UH Daily Cougar Macaca Columnist Hasan Rizvi looks the other way.

Liberal Sen. Joe Biden said in this past July, "you can't go into a 7-Eleven or into a Dunkin Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent. I'm not joking." And of course, that wasn't widely reported, and not at all in the liberal media.

I won't even go into the Bryant Gumbel racial comments, but it quite clear that liberals are racist too.

Anyway, enough about race, let's give a big UH Welcome Back to Al-UH Daily Cougar Macaca Columnist Hasan Rizvi. Yes, he loves America so much that he wants to kill every one of us all in the name of Islamo-facism. And Hasan is just doing his part by writing anti-American columns in liberal loving newspapers in the hopes of contributing to the future downfall of American society.

Screw the libs!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist David Salinas 'Loves Al Gore' (Big believer in "An Inconvenient Truth")

2006-08-22T08:43:00.000-05:00

All hail the great enviromentalist wacko David Salinas!

On Monday al-UH Daily Cougar columnist and resident cotton picker David Mohammed Salinas puts on his defense of "the boring" Al Gore in a seperate color section and complete waist of trees and UH funds.

In his tripe "Amatuer video lacks truth," David Mohammed Salinas complains about someone or group that makes fun of Algore's stupid so-called documentary "An Inconvenient Truth".

Salinas, when has Algore ever been taken seriously? In his environmentalist wacko book, I cannot even remember the name, "Earth in the learch" or something, Algore had not one reference to back his alarmist assertions in regards to the environment. Once again I'm inclined to believe that his stupid movie will do nothing but be refixed with the drug of being environmentally scared to death.

Salinas wants us to go to alternative fuels immediately. How stupid can that be? It will be decades before alternative fuels for transporation will be economical to cause a shift from fossil fuels. We have hundreds of years of fossil fuels left, and can you believe it, our air is cleaner than it was 50 years ago.

Mohammed's tripe on Monday tries to trick people prematurely away from fossil fuels. But we can't afford it right now. We will in the future as soon as more rich people buy these things, and scientist are given incentive to invent better technology, but even the rich people are shying away from the current alternative fuels for transport.

Anyone with a brain knows that the market (the people who buy things) set the trends. We went from walking to horse and buggy, and horse and buggy to the fossil fueled car. That did not happen over night. It took multiple decades, and even the horse and buggy is still in use today in Pennsylvania.

I worry about the future. The liberal caused high gas prices is slowly taking its toll. Six Flags just announced the closing or selling of at least six sites around the nation, Spring's 'SplashTown' included. Business was down 14%, because people are staying closer to home due to high gas prices. People are slowly speeding what they would have saved for retirement just to pay for higher gas and live today.

I desperately want to take my family to the Grand Canyon in my motorhome, but I had to settle for Baffin Bay (south of Corpus Christi) this year for a fishing trip to a boat house. Our dependence on foreign oil is killing us. WE NEED TO DRILL IN ANWR, off Florida, and along all of our shores. We need liberals to allow for windfarms in their own backyards, but as with fat liberal Senator Kennedy, he won't allow windfarms near his house. (See, with liberals, only other people are to follow their laws).

Salinas is just another one of those liberals who say one thing and do the other. He can't afford the more expensive hybrid car, but he'll write that you should get one. He blames the death of the electric car on a lawsuit, never once checking to see if the market wanted electric cars, which it didn't.

Oh the pouter David Salinas. He has to be jumping up and down saying "why don't stupid people buy hybrids?" This stupid guy doesn't celebrate how far we have come from the polluters of the past. He doesn't realize that we need time to breath before the next step. But Salinas, like a little kid wants it now, now, now.

Mohammed doesn't realize that oil companies are out to make money. He's probably like other liberals, jealous that they have money and he doesn't. The oil companies are not stupid. They are working towards the day when gasoline will not power cars, but they will still aim to make their profits, which fuels our economy.

Our best bet for our energy future should be aimed at being oil independent from the rest of the world. We should be drilling for oil all over our own backyard. We had our chance ten years ago when Der Schlick Meister vetoed drilling in ANWR. Of course with energy indepedence, we should also be looking towards the future with alternative fuels, which will wean us off fossil fuels as the market deems so.

What liberals don't get is that there may not be a general market acceptance of alternatively fueled vehicles for 30 or 40 years. But if we get a plan now, maybe we can be like Brazil and be energy independent, just as they planned some 35 years ago.

If the oil companies listened to the liberals our economy would greatly suffer. If the oil companies listened to David Mohammed Salinas, they would totally collapse.

Screw the libs!

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist David Salinas 'Advocate of Peace Thru Kumbaya in the Middle East' (He'll still be waiting for peace as a liberal old man)

2006-08-08T19:44:00.000-05:00

All hail the great appeaser David Salinas!

Today al-UH Daily Cougar columnist and resident cotton picker David Mohammed Salinas is hoping against hope in bringing together a group, the Hezbos, who among other things, have called for the complete annihilation of every Israeli man, woman, and child. On the other hand, the Israelis just want to be left to their land. They even label their forces as defensive in nature, while the Hezbos don't even wear uniforms, and the Israelis are seen as the bad guys.

I suppose Salinas is not a Jew or even a Mexican Jew, so when your side is losing, what do you do? You call for a ceasefire or make some gesture that calls for peace. In his tripe today "Violence not solution to conflict," David Mohammed Salinas writes that as a matter of genealogy that the Hezbos and Israel must cease hostilities because, hey, they're related.

This conflict has been going on for thousands of years, and its time to let them fight it out. Quite simply, if they don't fight it out, then there will never be peace. Of course Israel is the stronger power, and its up to them to simply ignore the impotent United Nations and anti-semitic world, and defeat Hezbollah decisively.

The Hezbos, if Israel ever agrees to a ceasefire, will simply rearm. Then in time, they will start again. Who can blame Israel? If we were threatened with the Hezbos, wouldn the United States appease? If a liberal were in the White House -- most definitely yes.

Salinas is so liberal that he refuses to label the Hezbos as a "terrorist organization." He refers to it as a "resistance movement." Mohammed gives the impression of being objective in his tripe but we know he sides with the Hezbos. He counts the dead knowing that any of the "509 civilians" that have been killed could be among the Hezbo ranks. Of course, who would know when the Hezbos don't where uniforms.

Israel is in a test, a test that the United States will soon have to start taking. By backing down to islamic facists with appeasement like the libs want, we will be forced to act when the islamic facists detonate a nuclear weapon or dirty bomb that really hurts US interest. When the terrorist go nuclear all this being nice and avoiding civilian casualties will be out the window.

Salinas' relying on Israel to bring peace is wrong. He doesn't fault the Hezbos for not accepting the US-Wimpy French cease fire offer, and now that the Wimpy French have surrendered to Arab resistance towards the offer, I don't a serious stoppage of fighting until the Hezbos are gone. Why should Israel pay the future price of innocent life lost due to a ceasefire today. Iran and its puppet army, the Hezbos, along with their friends in Europe and the UN only call for ceasefire because their guys are losing, and losing bad. A future fight with Iran in the future with nukes will be the price of appeasement today.

I still don't understand the flap about the casualties in war. We have more children hurt in shopping cart accidents in the US per year than all the US casualties in every war since after Vietnam plus the casualties in the Israel-Hezbo conflict. Libs are responsible for nearly a million abortions per year, yet they don't cry for that.

Liberals like David Salinas use death as a political tool. Do you really think that the American liberal personally cares a rats ass about any goddamn civilian in Lebanon. They might be facinated with the Hezbos liberal programs for the community, but we know the libs don't care about Israeli civilians. We can see that in the news coverage. But when Lebanese civilians are supposedly "murdered" by Israeli bombs at Qana, and the liberal press promoting fake photos to make the Israelis the bad guys, you have to wonder if the lib press aren't just another wing of the Hezbos.

Salinas' gullibility that "it's hard to think dropping bombs in Lebanon will solve anything" will keep him in a life of meaningless jobs and thoughts of tinkering with suicide in the future. There is only one way to end the Israeli-Hezbo conflict -- Israel must win for the true world.

A ceasefire is a worthless liberal way to peace. We saw that in Munich before WWII and in many other places. Appeasement simply does not work, and to think so will bring unimaginable consequences in the future that will make September 11th look like a drop in the bucket.

Mohammed's insistance that Israel "can't bomb their way to peace" is again bullcrap. WWII taught us that 'peace thru strength' is the only true course of action that Israel has to go. If Israel appeases the Hezbos, they sign their death warrant. If Israel listens to the liberals and the UN, they sign their death warrant. If Israel listens to David Mohammed Salinas, they sign their death warrant.

Screw the libs!

Al-UT Daily Texan Columnist Brad Domangue 'A Stupid Liberal Who Believes That We Can Deal With People Who Want All Americans and Israelis DEAD'

2006-08-04T17:06:00.000-05:00

Make a mental note. In the future when you need a lawyer, don't be looking for worthless UT wannbe lawyer Brad J. Domangue. One can hope that he does go with his "political journalism" dream since the liberal media is the one sector of the economy that is losing circulation and viewership at astounding rates. Or since his internship last year getting boinked by gay politicians he might even want to go into politics and spread the gay message.

What does Domangue know of war? Not a goddamned thing.

In his UT Daily Texan tripe today "The civility of a war already lost," Domangue fills us with his regurgitated liberal hogwash which is second, third, or even fourth hand, but the bottom line of Domangue's tripe today is that the US and Israel must understand the Hezbos and not defeat them, and don't dream of killing anyone in Southern Lebanon because they might be a so-called "innocent" civilian.

You know that Domangue is thinking appeasement all the way in dealing with terrorist. We must understand the terrorists. Why do they hate us? What did the United States do to provoke those peace loving people who want to kill us?

Brad, you see President Bush and Israel as more of a terrorist than al-Qaeda or Hezbollah. To Domangue, it is the United States fault that "the war in Iraq has killed an estimated 50,000 civilians." Of course the liberal Domangue won't tell you that Saddam Hussein killed hundreds of thousands more innocent civilians. That would ruin his argument.

And one thing Brad, prove that the United States killed those 50,000 civilians, which is a number that is just thrown out there for stupid liberals like Domangue to take as if they are trout coming across a bait on Baffin Bay. No questions asked as long as the US is the bad guy.

Domangue makes the Israelis look to be the bad guy in the current conflict against the Hezbos. The Hezbos started it. "The conflict in Lebanon has killed hundreds of innocent Lebanese." Again I say "prove that." The Hezbos don't wear uniforms, so how can a proper determination be made between innocent civilian and Hezbo.

Domangue never plays fair in his assertions. The Hezbos purposely put civilians in harms way with the placement of their armaments, and when those installations are attacked, the Hezbos have designed it for almost certain collateral civilian casualties. Yet, you will never read Domangue condemning the Hezbos for putting civilians in danger. You will never read Domangue condeming the Hezbos for firing on civilian areas and actually killing Israeli civilians. That's how ant-semitic Domangue is.

Domangue actually believes that it is possible to conduct a war without civilian casualties. He condemns Israel for Qana, but Domangue never questions the building collapse hours after the bombing or how a professionally done sign could be made literally minutes after the bombing condemning Israel's actions.

Domangue is totally bent left and virtually un-American when he writes "while America and Israel may win the battle on the ground, their actions have led to increased and more rapid recruitment in organizations that see the West and Israel as infidels deserving of destruction." To Domangue, it is always our fault.

Domangue is even more bent if he thinks that ""Collateral damage" simply means innocent mothers, fathers and children who are killed for the sake of our soldiers' safety." His "Rights for All" mentality loves to give American "rights" to enemy combatants who do not adhere to the Geneva Convention.

Domangue loves to understand people. I bet if a serial killed his Mother or a person special to him, Domangue would be stepping hand over fist to try and understand the killer and forget the memory of the person killed.

Domangue, who hates fetal life, probably doesn't care much more for Lebanese civilian life, but as long his position is against the United States and Israel, they hey, everythings OK.

It's stupid liberals like Brad J. Domangue that will invite an event in the future dozens of times worse than 9/11. The liberals appeasement, their quest for a lasting peace with islamo facists will only bring continued bloodshed in the future with many more American dead. How do Americans and Israelis appease terrorists -- Americans and Israelis die.

I say, let Israel FIGHT and WIN convincingly. No ceasefire. If the Hezbos were winning, would you think Berlin, Paris, the UN, and Tehran, would be called for a ceasefire.

Domangue's argument about the loss of innocent life does not hold water. If he showed the same concern for the loss of innocent Israeli civilians his argument might be slightly palatable, but his liberalism oozes an unyielding desire for the Hezbos to win over Israel, and the United States to have a failed policy in Iraq.

Screw the libs!