.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}
EIB Bumpersticker

Tuesday, October 17, 2006


Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Colin Ferguson 'Feds Need to Explore 9/11 Theories' (Actually believes 9/11 to be a Bush controlled demolition)

Did you know that Bush blew up the World Trade Center?

My God. If it weren't for brave liberals like Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Colin K. Ferguson, UH students would be the most uninformed people in America about 9/11 theories. Yeah right.

Facts man. It's about facts. We all saw those planes fly into the WTC fully loaded with fuel. There were no Bush controlled demolition teams on the ground that day; it was in the air with those ragheads flying those airplanes.

In his tripe today "Feds must address 9/11 theories," Colin Ferguson, UH's own Chicken Little, is trying to cause a little fuss over "the latest news regarding 9/11 conspiracy theories comes out of Wisconsin, where a University of Wisconsin-Madison professor likened President Bush to Adolf Hitler in materials for his course." Ho hum, another liberal professor trying to get into the spotlight, trying to compare 9/11 to Hitler's burning of the Reichstag in Nazi Germany. OK Bush is Hitler, we're all numb to those libs and their right to free speech, unlike liberals like Denise E. Hewitt who has no problem doing away with free speech when it hurts her or other liberals.

The lib prof that Colin proudly proclaims Bush is Hitler is "Kevin Barrett, the professor in question, [who] is a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, an organization that claims U.S. officials organized the attacks on the World Trade Center."

What Ferguson doesn't tell us in his tripe today was that Scholars for 9/11 Truth founder Jim Fetzer was on "The O'Reilly Factor," the other night and and Bill tore Fetzer another asshole.

Fetzer in no way presented any argument nor could he present one fact that President Bush was responsible for the 9/11 Attacks, and I was glad that O'Reilly treated him like the loon that Fetzer is.

Ferguson's blind allegiance to liberal prof's, even profs that are a half-country away calls into question his sexuality -- is he a knee bender, or not?

Ferguson evidently finds credence in the loon Barrett's argument or he wouldn't have written his tripe today. "Although many believe some or most of the official explanation, they still find reasons to doubt the whole story," Ferguson opined.

Ferguson goes on to enlighten us to more 9/11 theorist tripe by telling us of "'Loose Change,' a documentary that raises a number of questions surrounding the events of 9/11," and expounds the belief that "several of the named hijackers being alive and well in the countries of their origin." That's how crazy Colin K. Ferguson is ladies and gentlemen.

UH weak minded students. Tear out Ferguson's DC tripe today, rip it out, like those pages in the Dead Poets Society, it's pure excrement.

Ferguson's insistance that "we must entertain these alternate explanations, if only to debunk them," is completely absurd. Those libs are nothing more than people in their own internal prisons filing frivolous lawsuits about not getting enough peanut butter and crackers in their daily diets or something. It's crazy.

I would think that Kristen Young half-way thought of posting Ferguson's tripe on the funny pages. I mean really, the next thing you know Colin K. Ferguson will be writing about the conspiracy that President Roosevelt actually let the Japanese attack the US Navy Fleet at anchor in Pearl Harbor to launch us into WWII. Now that's real conspiracy.

Screw the Godless libs and the dem-leaning Mods!

I love how you left out the part where he mentioned the rebuttals to Loose Change, as well as calling Fetzer "extreme" - you completely ignore half of the argument and the basis for its conclusion.

I suppose if I couldn't read the article and accurately represent it, I'd be upset, too.
Colin is playing firmly on the side of the conspiracy fence seeing as the piece was overwhelmly slanted towards Fetzer's side of the argument from the beginning.

Ferguson put that "extreme" part in there so he would not appear as a "nut" himself. So why should I mention it. If Colin were sincere about America, he would have called Fetzer a "nut" or "half-baked" or something. He knows that O'Reilly called the 60's relic Fetzer a "nut" to his sideburned face.

Colin's obviously a big lib, and I refuse to help him in any argument.

Anyway, I don't hear Ferguson being upset about the liberal media purposely NOT reporting on the liberal Senator Harry Reid land scandal and illegal use of campaign funds scandal?
I think I felt a tinge of that crazy backwoods liberalhater rage when I read this article. I mean, I'm a liberal and all, but come ooon.

Good to see you're still at it.
Hey Justin, it's great to hear from you!!

I was a little steamed on this post. Those guys are really crazy to think that 9/11 wasn't about islamic facists flying planes into buildings.

Sometimes I wish you were back on the DC so we could spare again.
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?