.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}
EIB Bumpersticker

Tuesday, October 31, 2006


Liberals Get Real Trick on Halloween 'Human Liver Grown in UK Laboratory' (CORD BLOOD, not embryonic stem cells used)

Dr Nico Forraz (left) and Prof Colin
McGuckin, (below) the tissue created in
the lab is actually the size of a 1p piece

Bad new for liberals.

The UK Daily Mail is reporting that Newcastle University researchers "have grown the world's first artificial liver from stem cells in a breakthrough that will one day provide entire organs for transplant."

The 'mini-liver' is the "size of a one pence piece, will be developed to create a full-size functioning liver."

The liberal media here will probably report the success of the use of stem cells, but will not report which type, which was stem cells "taken from babies' umbilical cords" blood, "just a few minutes after birth."

Some new aspects for the mini liver, will involve testing new drugs, fewer testings on animal subjects, and in a matter of five to ten years can hopefully provide surgical uses for repairing livers, with the eventual hope of growing entire livers in the lab for transplant.

This is big news, and the liberals will ignore it because it doesn't fit their embryonic stem-cell template.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!


Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Colin Ferguson 'Thinks Osama Obama Should Be President' (I guess he watches Oprah)

Super Barack is just a poser when it comes
to running for President

I guess if you have created a website that creates a "database online of all federal spending (including loans, various grants, contracts, and other financial assistance)," that now makes you acceptable to be President.

Folks, the man has done nothing and al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Colin K. Ferguson feels that Sen. Barack Obama is ready for the White House. Do Bill and Hillary Clinton know about this?

In his tripe today "Obama ready for White House," Colin Ferguson, UH's own Chicken Little, must be watching to much Oprah because that's where this whole thing started.

Obama made an angelic appearance on Oprah, and Oprah said she would support him for President, and next thing you know we have news stories all over the nation claiming that Obama is ready for the White House.

Obama talks a good game. Hell, Mario Cuomo is still living off his speech he made at the 1988 democratic convention, and he has done nothing. See folks, it's all talk. They do nothing, but they talk a good game. And even when they don't talk a good game, they still have the liberal media to sweep their mistakes under the rug.

Civil Rights leaders have talked a good game, but have they created any internal programs to help their peeps get ahead in life? No, they allow them to remain stupid so that they continue to vote democrat. Well, they know better now, and times are changing.

Colin calls Sen. Hillary Clinton "a solid leader and a strong woman to boot. However, she is uninspiring at best." Did he get clearance from the UH Young Democrats to write his tripe?

Ferguson proudly reports on Obama's rise to fame when "back in 2004, Obama was running for his current Illinois Senate seat when he made a name for himself at the Democratic National Convention by being the best speaker present." I'm looking at Obama as the first Black Mario Cuomo who has already gotten two years out of his speech, with only a website to show for it.

Obama said in his two year-old speech "we worship an awesome God in the blue states" but neglects to tell us that only 1-in-4 democrats believes in God, that "all of us pledg[e] allegiance to the stars and stripes," but they support removing God from that pledge, and all "of us defend[] the United States of America," while at the same time what to give the terrorists American Civil Rights.

Obama's a fraud people. Ferguson is looking for hope in democrats, but it is a false hope. My God, John Kerry, last night at Pasadena City College said that only dumb and uneducated soldiers go to Iraq. Who are they trying to kid?

Ferguson's wish that "Obama represents the Democratic Party as it wishes to be seen -- strong, caring, thoughtful, intelligent, sensible and otherwise worthy of the power we afford it." Hell, if he were that, he'd be a Republican.

To answer Colin's question "is America ready for a black president?" I say hell yeah!!

He just won't be a democrat.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!


Democrat Leadership is Missing 'Using out of sight out of mind election strategy' (Hoping to steal back power Stalin Style)

In the last weeks of this election you will have a hard time to find a quote out of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi or Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid. Why? And no, it's not because they are picking out new drapes for their prospective offices. It is because of their big mouths and their Stalinist plans for change in Washington, so they don't want to ruin it for the few democrats who do have a chance at winning next week.

Twelve years ago, Newt Gingrich and the Republican leadership was found all over television, and believe it or not -- they had a plan. It worked and they were elected.

Today, the democrats have a plan as well, a plan they won't tell you, unless of course they are elected. With the democrats, you don't get to test ride that new car, and like a communist society, you get what the state gives you. I say, no way.

I still maintain the polls are off, even after the pollsters have narrowed their polls to maintain credibility following the election.

Look, many people are going to cell phones as their main form of communication completely doing away with landlines going to their homes. My sister has done it already, as well as some friends, cousins, and even one of my elderly aunts. How can the pollsters be getting the complete picture of what America is thinking when an increasing portion of America is going off landline.

When was the last time you were polled by CNN, Fox, Zogby, etc? I've been an arbitron rater once, which is an every 40 year possibility, but I've never been polled by a major pollster, nor has anybody that I know. Where are these people found? I'm of the mind that a lot of the polls that we see are simply made up to suit the liberal medias template for making Republicans and President Bush look bad.

Honestly, I believe that America is fed up with the liberal media, and we have seen signs, such as Dan Rather's firing, liberal newspaper circulations plummetting, and GOP candidates doing well in typically liberal states.

The Conservative Media of Radio and TV Talk Show Host as well as Conservative Bloggers, are doing extremely well. They do set the record straight, and let the liberals to stew in their own juices. Thankfully, Blacks slowly en masse are realizing that supporting democrats has gotten them no where, and a good number will either stay home in protest or actually try and vote Republican for the first time in their lives.

The Soros dominated democrats have no respect for the Black Community. They allow the Blacks to roam the countryside until ten days before election when they are all rounded up and herded to the polls. To the MoveOn.orgers, Blacks are only good for a democrat vote, and nothing else.

I don't think Americans are actually believing what the liberal media is saying. I mean the ACLU dropped their Patriot Act challenge, and most Americans are not stupid enough to believe that the government is actually listening and recording them. Mrs. Cheney was right, they are listening for terrorists phone calls, and nothing else. Besides the storage space and processing technology, not to mention the millions of analyst needed would make it a failing enterprise. Concentrate on terrorists phone calls, and you've got yourself a program.

If the United States is fooled into allowing the democrats into power, then we deserve we get as a nation. Because you know the liberals will be more fair to al-Qaeda than to our own military, and taxpayers, and the next you know, we will have our own Pompeii.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

Monday, October 30, 2006


Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'Houston Chronicle Experiences More Chronarrhea' (Circulation down another 3.6%)

I always enjoy these posts.

Editor and Publisher is reporting on the new newspaper circulation numbers as of September 2006, and the old standard Houston Chronicle took another hit with its circulation down another 3.6% to 508,097. Since March 2005, the Chronicle has lost 17.4 percent of their circulation, and you can be assured that they don't blame their journalism as being the problem. You are the problem for not buying their tripe.

I vow not to support the Houston Chronicle until it is sold to a Conservative outfit or closes. Someone almost convinced me the other month to subscribe, but in the end I said, "I'm sorry, I cannot support liberalism," and walked away.

The San Fransisco Chronicle lost another 5.3%.

No word yet if the Houston Chronicle will be laying off any of its Black, Hispanic, and probably even Asian workers, but as we all know that those layoffs won't effect the Chronicle's liberal journalism.

One day, the libs at the Chronicle will have to stop believing that Houstonians are totally stupid. That day will be when they realize that slanted liberal journalism does not work.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!


Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist David Salinas 'Now Its Racist for White Girls to Wink At Handsome Black Men' (Fearlessly writes N-Word multiple times)

Racism is constantly being redefined everyday, and now it's considered racist for an attractive white girl to wink at a handsome Black man, and say "call me," at least in a GOP political commercial.

Today al-UH Daily Cougar columnist and resident cotton picker David Mohammed Salinas is doing his last minute part to try and confuse the UH electorate into completely voting democrat on November 7th. He's doing the best can -- by lying to you.

In his tripe today "Ad campaigns focus on race," Salinas plays "on fears rooted in racial bias to garner those last few votes." He quotes the N-word four times, which to me is a direct insult to the UH Black Community.

He only reports on so-called GOP discrimination, never mentioning anything dem, which are really to numerous to mention.

The GOP ad on Harold Ford, which was funny and addressed the issues that people are interested in, and spelled out that Ford is truly a 'liberal.' Now Ford is out there claiming to be 'God-fearing' and 'gun-loving,' all the things that democrats truly stand for, yeah right. And get this, Ford is out there claiming that Democrats "love the Lord" more than the GOP. And not to mention Ford is out there crashing his opponent Bob Corker's camapign appearances, such as was seen in the "Memphis Meltdown.'

There is a lot of sick stuff out there, like that MJ Fox never even read Amendment 2 before he did that stupid stem-cell ad in Missouri. Salinas will never tell you anything about that.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!


Lynne Cheney Tears CNN's Wolf Blitzer A New Asshole for running Terrorists Propaganda

I've ate so much steak over the past few days, I'm not going to eat it for a month. Sunday afternoon, I even had an anti-war lib cousin over at the Northern Command. I insisted she table all her talk of politics until after dinner, since everyone was there to party.

She held her fire until after desert. She knows my history and what I stand for, and after dinner a small group of us retired to my study with a bottle of wine.

Of course I got the liberal line from my cousin about how we should redeploy, or just plain withdraw from Iraq, and that it was a mistake, and not to mention that it would be better if Saddam were back in power.

I really didn't want to argue with my cousin about the war so I proposed an analogy. I said to my cousin. "Imagine you live in a beautiful utopian community, on the beautiful seaside with gorgeous mountains to your rear. Unless your a worker, you haven't a care in this liberal utopia, since everything is done for you."

"Then one day, the ground starts to rumble. No worries. It's happens occassionally. Live goes on as normal. A week, month, maybe a year or two, and the ground starts to rumble again. Again, no worries although some buildings are damaged, one or two are killed, but again, live goes on as normal in this liberal utopia. The workers are there to clean up the mess."

"Then one day a few years later, the ground again rumbles the hardest its ever rumbled before, and this time the mountain behind the liberal utopia starts to smoke and send soil into the air. Again some buildings are damaged, several hundred are killed, but initial worries soon fade, and life returns to normal. The workers again clean up the ash and the mess."

"Then one day a few months later, the mountain really blows its top, again with earthquakes. Ash is spit into the air the farthest its ever gone up, the earthquakes are getting stronger. No one knows what's going on, but they know that the workers will clean it up when it passes. But the mountain doesn't quit, the earthquakes don't quit, and just when the liberals begin to take action against the mountain, by leaving their utopia, the mountain really blows its top and sends a pyroclastic flow of deadly material into the town killing everyone and burning everything for 1,600 years."

"My dear cousin, when it is to late for liberals to take action against our mountain (the terrorists), that is when we, the US, will have our own Pompeii (in the form of a nuclear bomb or dirty bomb.")

Liberalism kills in so many forms, such as abortion, euthanasia, cutting and running from military situations resulting in the genocide of millions by the victors, taking inaction with UN Resolutions which allow dictators to kill their own citizens.


The NewsBusters Posting Lynne Cheney Blasts CNN: 'Why Are You Running Terrorist Propaganda?' tells it all. I'm growing more prouder of Mrs. Cheney, The First Lady, VP Cheney, and The President all the time. They are telling it like it is, calling the libs on their assertions, and not accepting the libs premise in their questioning.

CNN might as well be the TPNN (Terrorist Propaganda News Network). In a recent interview of Lynne Cheney by TPNN anchor Wolf Blitzer, Mrs. Cheney accused Blitzer of airing terrorist propaganda, which involved TPNN airing a tape solely provided by terrorists in Iraq killing American soldiers.

In the interview, Mrs. Cheney cornered Blitzer about CNN running the terrorist propaganda tape which involved shooting American soldiers, and "bluntly asked if Blitzer wanted the U.S. to win in Iraq."

Great move Mrs. Cheney. Blitzer was running scared. Incredibly, the liberal media is on the run. Their patriotism is being challenged, and Mrs. Cheney won the day.

Blitzer's answer to Mrs. Cheney's blunt question was "the answer, of course, is we want the United States to win. We are Americans. There's no doubt about it. You think we want terrorists to win?" But it didn't sound sincere to me. It sounded like a man perplexed, wanting to quickly move on to to the originial intention of the interview, which was Mrs. Cheney's book.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

Sunday, October 29, 2006


How Come The Liberal Media Doesn't Report More of This? (We are winning people, and the liberal media wants you to believe Iraq is in Civil War)

When I see something like this. I know what we are doing in Iraq is worth it. Our soldiers are fighting for themselves, their buddies, that little kid being hugged. And all liberals can do is verbally "spit" in our soldiers faces.

Liberals would have you believe that Karl Rove set up this moment.

Saturday, October 28, 2006


How Would a Liberal Senator Webb Write Legislation? (Given that Webb Says His Novels are 'Inappropriate' for even News Radio to read 'on air')

I got a lot of amusement out of hearing the surfacing information about liberal Virginia Senatorial Candidate and Porn Author, Jim Webb, and the novels that he has written that are really demeaning to women and children.

I mean the stuff is so explicit, that Webb himself said that his novels are 'inappropriate' for News Radio or even Talk Radio to repeat on the air. Were talking Fathers having oral sex with sons, and strippers slicing bananas with their v******, you get the picture. How the hell Webb couldn't think that his porn style of writing would not become an issue in the campaign is mindboggling to me. Let me guess, Karl Rove made Webb think and write that crap by using mind control.

With all that, it got me to thinking. How would Webb, if elected to the Senate, write his legislation in the Senate? So I picked out some old legislation, changed a few names, and thought Webb slutty.


SJ 39 IS


2d Session

S. J. RES. 39

To spur a political solution in Iraq and encourage the people of Iraq to provide for their own security through the redeployment of the United States military forces.


June 6, 2006

Mr. WEBB introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations


To spur a political solution in Iraq and encourage the people of Iraq to provide for their own security through the redeployment of the United States military forces.

Whereas the United States military forces have served bravely in Iraq and deserve the heartfelt support of the United States;

Whereas Mrs. Boxer has the hots for Mrs. Clinton, and Mrs. Boxer would enjoy passing her tongue over and into Mrs. CLINTON's "honey pot," unleashing Mrs. Clinton's body into a hail of quivers;

Whereas Mrs. Boxer and Mrs. Clinton, would request private sessions with Mr. Kennedy and Mr. Dodd to recreate the famous Kennedy/Dodd "waitress sandwich" with Mrs. Boxer and Mrs. Clinton each taking their turn as the "waitress";

Whereas Mr. Webb, would request weekly oral servicings on the Senate Floor from Ms. Landrieu, with full rights to fully disrobe Ms. Landrieu, and demand she slice Mr. Webb's banana into several pieces with her "ax wound" while in the split position and having Ms. Landrieu's breasts shine brightly in the Senate Chamber lights;

Whereas more than 200 coalition personnel have been killed in support of military operations in Iraq;

Whereas, according to a January 2006 poll, 64 percent of Iraqis believe that crime and violent attacks will decrease when the United States redeploys from Iraq, 67 percent of Iraqis believe that their day-to-day security will increase if the United States redeploys from Iraq, and 73 percent of Iraqis believe that there will be greater cooperation among the political factions of Iraq when the United States redeploys from Iraq: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That--

(1) United States military forces in Iraq are to be redeployed from Iraq by December 31, 2006, or earlier if practicable;

(2) nothing in this resolution prohibits the use of United States military forces from training Iraqi security forces in the region outside of Iraq; and

(3) nothing in this resolution prohibits the use of United States military forces based outside of Iraq to--

(A) conduct targeted and specialized counter-terrorism missions in Iraq; and

(B) protect military and civilian personnel of the United States in Iraq.


Now that would be some "HOT" legislation.

Uh, pardon me. But didn't the liberal media predict that St. Louis Cardinals were going to be smashed by the NY Mets in the NLCS. Well, they just beat the Detroit Tigers to win The World Series.

I can't quite place what the liberal media will be wrong with next, but I'm sure that it will come to me by the morning of November 8th.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

Friday, October 27, 2006


Al-UH Daily Cougar Handles Liberal Senator Reid Scandals with Kid Gloves

You gotta to give Kristen Young some credit for running at least something on liberal Senator Harry Reid's land scandal and illegal use of campaign funds. She's trying. Hell, she's lost some weight, and looks a lot better from her pictures of old.

Today's Friday Forum, "What do you think of Harry Reid's use of funding?," was an almost half-way fair and balanced considering liberal Senator Harry Reid is a democrat and we are less than two weeks away from the mid-term elections.

But since it ran on a Friday when the UH student population is at its lowest all week, you get the feeling that the libs in the leftist Communications building can say "see were are fair and balanced," while at the same time giving a wink-and-nod to the UH Young Democrats.

We all know that liberals are getting way to many "free rides" in the liberal media, and it shows. I mean, My God, the NY Times profits were down 39% the last time I checked. Lib media outlets all over the country are losing money, laying off liberals, and desperately trying not to follow the "Fox News Channel business model."

Incredibly, ABC News political director Mark Halperin, a liberal, in his recent book "The Way To Win" conceded that Conservatives know all to well not to trust the liberal media, and its time to get their trust back if the lib media is going to survive by adopting something close to the Fox model.

In the Al-DC's teaser today, it appears that liberal Senate Minority Leader Reid does really get a pass seeing as the accusations appear so tame. The "$3,300 from campaign funds to give bonuses to the staff at his residence," was an illegal act, and even his shady land deal was brushed off as "who hasn't bought a $1 million-plus worth of land and then shifted the title in mysterious ways" when you know that if Reid were a Republican he'd been in the headlines everyday.

Young tried her best to put half for and half against Reid. Isaiah Warner was pretty hard on Reid, calling for his removal from the Senate and the democrat party. Zach Lee condemned Reid, but didn't call for his resignation or removal from being leader. Christian Palmer and Jude Maydwell cheered Reid on. Jordan Overturf blamed Republicans for the scandal, and that Reid's misdoings aren't "a big deal". But Jordan will be there calling for impeachment if the libs win in November.

I do take satisfaction, schadenfreude in fact, that if any of these people are looking for employment in the liberal media once they graduate, they will be working at the local Burger King, rewriting the menu.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!


Al-NYT: Democrats See Black Turnout as a Challenge

VA Liberal Senatorial Candidate
and Porn Author, Jim Webb, meeting
with very enthusiastic Black Voters
(Photo: The Virginian-Pilot)

Just back from a nice celebratory steak dinner with a couple of buds and a cousin of mine for the big news today. What's $450 plus for some steaks and beers when you're having fun. Will probably drop another $600 before the end of the weekend with family. And you know who, we got a lot laughs off of you.

When I got back to my place and relaxed a bit, I ran across this New York Times story for Friday "Democrats See Black Turnout as a Challenge," which echoed my thoughts about how Blacks are not as enthusiastic about voting this time for democrats, and well, I felt compelled to make a post.

I'm of the thought that Blacks are tired of being "herded" like sheep to the democrat feeding trough just before the election. For instance, the NYT pointed out that Virginia liberal Jim Webb, who is running against Sen. George Allen, and of course, the liberal "crammed in visits to 12 Black churches, and for several weeks he has been pumping money into advertisements on Black radio stations and in Black newspapers." In effect, the herding has begun.

Missouri liberal Claire McCaskill, who is caught up in the middle of the Michael J Fox disaster, is trying to fool Blacks with ads on sickle cell anemia, and how embryonic stem-cell research can cure afflicted Black people with sickle cell, but Blacks will only be cured if the liberal is elected.

I've maintained for weeks that Black voter turnout is vital in this election, and that democrats have continued to ignore their Black base, something that nobody has been talking about.

"There are worries among Democratic strategists in some states that Blacks may not turn up at the polls in big enough numbers because of disillusionment over past shenanigans." Not GOP, but democrat shenanigans because you know if it were GOP they would have said so.

The Pew Research Center found that Black disenchantment in the voting system has nearly doubled since 2004 to 29%. Not to mention that 16% of Blacks voted GOP in 2004. Larry X included, and I'm sure alot more of his buds will be voting GOP this year.

Nearly 30% of Blacks do not see their votes being counted accurately, but in Black voting areas like New Orleans, liberals run the show. Again, if the GOP were responsible for miscounting Black votes, then the GOP would have been blamed.

The NYT says that "voting experts say the disillusionment is the cumulative effect of election problems in 2000 and 2004, and a reaction to new identification and voter registration laws. Long lines and shortages of poll workers in lower-income neighborhoods in the 2004 election and widespread reports of fliers with misinformation appearing in minority areas have also had a corrosive effect on confidence." That is pure bullcrap.

The democrat party has been hijacked by the very extreme leftist George Soros-type groups and Howard Dean, and Blacks have simply been left out in the cold. It was afterall Howard Dean who said, "I hate the Republicans and everything they stand for" in a long ago meeting with the DNC Black Caucus, "you think the Republican National Committee could get this many people of color in a single room? Only if they had the hotel staff in here."

I believe Blacks know they have been hijacked, and come November 8th, they will be the "big story," about how the liberals lost the election, again. I still maintain that if the democrat party wins the House, I will close this blog immediately, not that it will eventually be closed anyway.

I'm not convinced that democrats, at least the ones with some common sense, are that excited about voting dem this year. I mean Black GOP candidates, especially Michael Steele in MD, actually has a real chance in a heavily democrat state, where the Black democrat primary candidate, former NAACP president Kweisi Mfume lost to a white guy, Ben Cardin.

"Recent polls have found record levels of outrage from Democrats about the current political leadership, which may offset the effect of Black disillusion." But as I've pointed out before, the polls, if you look closely between the lines, are most of the time heavily overweighted with democrats.

Well, it is late, and I've got to get my night-table reading out of the way.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

Thursday, October 26, 2006


Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Jeff Cokenour 'Props Up Michael J Fox ad' (Liberals lie to sick people with false hope for sick in those Political Ads)

I nailed the interview. I got the job I wanted with the firm I wanted, and this evening I will be sending out my "Thanks, but no thanks" letters in reference to the offers I've already received. That also means pretty soon I will have to stop posting on this blog. I've got a lot of things to do, but I will try and post at least once a day until Election Day. After that, I will play it by ear, seeing as I already started my post-UH blog with my real name of all things.

I've really enjoyed my time here at UH. It's been fun sparing with the sane people among you. As for the crazy people, and they know who they are, they might miss me even more because there won't be anybody for them to be angry at on campus.


Did you know that if John Kerry were elected President that Christopher Reeve would be walking today, and that if the democrats win it all in November that Michael J. Fox's Parkinson's Disease will suddenly be reversed?

The liberals are lying to sick people folks, and Michael J. Fox knows he's lying. And the
al-UH Daily Cougar has to go all the way down the coast to get UH-Victoria biology junior Jeff Cokenour to comment on it, since none of our own liberals can spell biology much less understand it.

Cokenour obviously sides with MJ Fox on this issue. Evidently the diseased and disabled, especially the celebrity diseased and disabled can say anything that they want in the political arena and not expect to be challenged. Isn't it incredible that all the other issues like Iraq, the economy, Foley, gas prices, have fallen by the wayside. Now stem-cell research is the latest October surprise, and I think that people will not be fooled by the libs and MJ Fox.

This whole thing boils down to money, cloning, and how can the liberal sacrament of abortion be prolonged.

In his tripe today "
Human cloning not research avenue," Jeff Cokenour starts with "in the state of Missouri, certain people are trying to manipulate a sick man -- Michael J. Fox -- for their own ends by saying that a new ballot measure scheduled for the November 2006 election would ban stem-cell research." My God, these people are desperate.

Stem-cell research is already legal in Missouri. The major issue here is cloning as well as federally funded clinics being able to pay money to poor women for their eggs. And the implication that Republicans don't want to see Michael J. Fox get well is crazy.

But looking at reality, it looks more like Fox is playing the public, seeing as when he is on TV shows like Boston Legal he takes the right amount of medication, and when he appears in front of Congress or in his political TV commercials, he doesn't take his medication or doesn't take the right amount of medication his symptoms are readily shown. Now Fox has admitted that in his book and in interviews to not taking his meds properly to play on people's sympathy, but what Fox is saying is like Algore saying that "Republicans want dirty air and water."

It's absolute poppycock what the liberals are saying.

The Missouri Constitutional Amendment 2 is really backwards. The wording sounds good:

"This amendment will allow Missouri patients and researchers access to any method of stem-cell research, therapies and cures permitted under federal law. It also will set limits on any stem-cell research, therapies and cures, including banning human cloning or attempted cloning. Violators will be subject to criminal and civil penalties."

And if you vote FOR you are actually voting for CLONING. Read it for yourself, I'm not trying to hide anything. I've always maintained that if the democrats are FOR an issue, then it's bad for America. Well, the liberals are FOR it, and the voters of Missouri are more than likely going to be AGAINST it Thank God.

Cokenour maintains that "the proposed Missouri law would ban all human cloning efforts and guarantee legal protection for the type of stem-cell research allowed by the federal government." That's not true. The amendment wording for cloning actually reads "no person may clone or attempt to clone a human being". No one will attempt to clone a human being, but the Missouri Amendment leaves the door open for everything else including human body parts, sheep, and cloning embryos for their destruction, etc.

Cokenour being a biology major will not tell you currently "72 maladies for which human patients have received some benefit," that from the Weekly Standard, but absolutely nothing has been proved with embryonic stem cells,and you can check that out in the MD Anderson Library by reviewing the medical journals.

Adult stem cell treatments are working, you can receive them, while you won't see the same for embryonic stem-cells. Stem-cell research is going on at the state level, but the liberals really want federal funding for embryonic research.

"As one who hopes to be a physician in the future, I want all disease and illness be cured and that everyone, regardless of race or creed, be able to live a healthy, normal life,"
Jeff said.

Look, I've stated facts to counter
Cokenour's game. Hell, I've got several family members dying of inoperable cancers right now, and I'd take any treatment for them to get better, but embryonic stem-cell research isn't panning out. Adult stem-cells are working, and to not even mention such treatments borderlines on quackery.

Jeff ought to be ashamed to have written it if he is such an esteemed writer. But if he can't be honest with the tripe he set forth in his piece today, how the hell is
Jeff Cokenour going to be honest with his future patients.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!

Tuesday, October 24, 2006


NOW Bitches: Happy Love Your Body Day! on October 18th (It was so momentous that I forgot)

This came in the e-mail last week from the NAGs about their Happy Love Your Body Day! It read:

Take a moment today, October 18, to honor yourself and love your body, just as it is.

Carry that spirit with you throughout the year, as you love your body every day!

Today marks the ninth annual Love Your Body Day, a day of action in our year-long Love Your Body Campaign. In response to unhealthy and exploitive images of women in the media, NOW Foundation established the Love Your Body Campaign to promote positive, healthy images of women and girls, protest harmful and offensive advertisements, and raise awareness about women's health issues.

Here are some suggestions for actions you can take this month, or any time!
  • Organize a picket or start a petition drive to tell advertisers that their ads are offensive to women and create unhealthy expectations. Check out the "bad ads" and the good ads as well!
  • Create T-shirts with messages that uplift body-esteem like: "My Sum Is Greater Than My Parts," "I am Not my Hair," "Real Women have Curves," and of course "Love Your Body."
  • Host a forum on women's health issues. Get the facts!
  • Hold a LYBD fashion show! Whether you're styling in cultural dress, after-five attire, or weekend garb, embrace women's lovely shapes and shades.
  • Local eateries not meeting your standards? Stuff the suggestion box with suggestions for better food choices.
  • Organize a rally to create awareness of body image issues. Have a festival—with good music, good food, free services and information!
  • Send a Love Your Body e-card.
  • If you are pregnant, abort your fetus.

More action ideas are available on the Love Your Body website!

According to the National Eating Disorders Association (NEDA) 80 percent of women express dissatisfaction with their appearance. Help reverse the trend and take action today!

Help remind yourself to love your body every day with our 2007 Calendar, featuring art of dead fetuses submitted in the Love Your Body Poster Contest. Buy one today, and share it with someone you love! Perfect for a girl in your life.

Monday, October 23, 2006


Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Denise Hewitt 'Free Speech in Her Tripe Today' (DC Insider reports Hewitt is a "Do As I Say (Not As I Do)" liberal)

I wasn't going to post this evening. Maybe check the comments, and respond quickly. But then I decided to take another look at the al-UH Daily Cougar on my desk before I tossed it in its rightful home -- the trash can.

Low and behold, guess what. I found a piece that I earlier overlooked because of the hours free time that I have to post on this blog as proclaimed by the UH Slavedriver. It was a piece by al-UH Daily Cougar regurgitator of liberal professor crap columnist Denise E. Hewitt, and guess what, she's talking of Free Speech.

In her tripe today "Freedom not granted without costs," Hewitt goes on about the freedom of speech and how "it allows us to speak out" and make our ordinary citizens voices be projected across the countryside.

I won't delve too much into her tripe today, but generally, everyone gets a chance to speak no matter their views and those voices should not be hindered. For instance, Hewitt made the point that the KKK has the right to meet peacefully on park lands, etc. But as we will come to find out that when Denise E. Hewitt is cornered in her arguments, she will become a Stalinist and force an end to free speech.

Now, let's go back to October 5th and my post "Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Denise Hewitt 'Attacking Wal-Mart on Order from the Young Democrats at UH' (I'm buying more Wal-Mart stock)," when I shredded Hewitt like a head of lettuce in countering her anti-Wal-Mart campaign.

In steps The DC Insider with interesting information about Denise's reaction to my post. To mildly say, Hewitt was pissed, and I was warned by the DCI that Denise was finally onto me and that I "better watch out!." Well I almost shit my pants cowering in fear for the blitzkrieg of Feminazi crap that I would soon endure from Hewitt. None came.

So what did Hewitt do. Well, the DCI reports that Denise went to her liberal friend focus group. "She posted a thread kind of laughing it off in a private forum. She posted a link to her op-ed and then your article."

Hewitt "thought she'd be backed up by her liberal friends. Well it turned out that her liberal friends weren't quite as ultra-far left and looney as she is. They actually challenged her stance and she couldn't take the heat."

Then folks, the Great Defender of Free Speech Denise E. Hewitt, "then requested the moderator lock the thread." Yep, that makes Hewitt look like a "Do As I Say (Not As I Do)" liberal to me.

Yes, the Stalinist Denise Hewitt silenced the opposition "just like the Columbia students" did when they didn't like what they heard.

The DC Insider went on to say that "free speech is only allowed by ultra-libs when it's their speech or agrees with their stance 100%. I'm suprised she didn't learn earlier. [Hewitt] used to post (in the private forum) her forthcoming op-eds in full prior to them being published. She received such little praise and too much "constructive" criticism that she just stopped posting them."

Many thanks to the The DC Insider for those juicy tidbits of information about the Stalinist Denise Hewitt. It spells volumes about this liberal, and liberalism in general.

Screw the Godless libs and the leaning-dem Mods!


Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist David Salinas 'Bipartisanship best for US' (But it only works when Republicans agree with democrats)

I've always thought about bipartisanship as a one-way street for democrats. Yes, they will stand behind President Bush at the beginning of the war, but when it drags and a few Americans die compared to other American campaigns, the libs jump off the wagon as soon as they can and support the enemy with their rhetoric.

As for liberals, bipartisan is Republicans agreeing with democrats, and that's it. Republicans have been fooled by the word -- bipartisan -- for the longest time now, especially when the Republicans controlled the Senate and still liberal Tom Daschle was the defacto head of that body thanks to GOP bipartisanship.

So today, we find al-UH Daily Cougar columnist and resident cotton picker David Mohammed Salinas might actually be thinking in the back of his mind what I believe most Americans will be thinking now that early voting has begun. "Which political party will best protect my family from the threat of terrorism?" Honest to God who cannot be fooled, it will be the Republicans that people will have to choose.

In his tripe today "Bipartisan policies best for U.S.," Salinas feeds us his code-word "bipartisan" which sets the democrats up for still another loss this November. Mohammed writes that "the Republican Party will not lose this mid-term election," but he makes up for it to his lib friends on UH by stating that "Republicans may lose control of the House of Representatives and maybe even the Senate," but America stoop to that level of stupidity. We'll soon find out.

I certainly don't believe that if the "democrats win this election cycle, it is not a death knell for Republican and conservative ideals, but it would mark the end of the Karl Rove-George Bush-Rush Limbaugh style of politics." Please. My God, the liberals are still trying to destroy the President, who cannot run for office anymore, and by 2008 will not have any ammunition for his GOP successor. Rush Limbaugh has never based his success on who wins elections, and even with the GOP in power, he is still No. 1.

Liberals have been setting themselves up for defeat for a couple of months now. Little stories hear and there about election machine faults and other things have been popping up all over the place. CNN had a stupid show about Broken Government this weekend and gave the impression that the US elections could not held fairly. Poppycock.

I'm of the impression that democrats actually want to lose this year and stake everything on 2008. They've purposely not paid any attention to their Black base, yet we hear stories of how Barrack Obama will be the democrats savior in 2008. Even Oprah is backing Obama instead of Hillary because of all the baggage Clinton maintains. Hell, looking at the democrat record of following Black dem leaders, Obama will be the next fall guy.

Mohammed speaks of another code-word -- common good -- which again means that Republicans have to yield to democrat ideals in order for the country to advance. Ex-President Clinton used all those code words in a recent speech. If the democrats were confident about the election, we wouldn't be hearing any of the code-words, but only strong words such as "winning back power."

I haven't seen one enthusiastic liberal about the election, and certainly Mohammed isn't enthusiatic or he wouldn't be talking bipartisanship today in his tripe.

Rush Limbaugh gave his listeners a great analogy about the liberal media spin on the elections and how they will perform. "They're thinking they are going to win, but they've spike the ball on the 10 yard line." They prematurely ejaculated their October Surprise, Foley, and the GOP electorate has become all to aware of their dirty tricks. Not to mention that the polls they conduct are outweighed with democrats, sometimes by as much as 24%. It's really a deliberate effort to suppress GOP voters, and quitely simply, I don't think its working.

I'm glad that Salinas brought up the Second Tier President Ronald Reagan, and how he worked with democrats. But that was then. The democrats are a whole new ballgame nowadays. They literally cannot be reasoned with. Just like the terrorists, when the terrorists start off negotiations by demanding your Jewish and American deaths, where else do you go from that?

Bush initially had comparisons to Reagan because he worked well with democrats as Texas Governor, and he did real good as Texas Governor, and he is still doing good, but I still have my disagreements with Bush in certain areas like illegal immigration and what have you. But I still support the President.

Back in the days of Tip O'Neill, the democrats had a "plan" to counter the Republicans plan. Now they don't. Back in the days of Tip O'Neill, the democrats weren't held hostage as they are today by the extreme left wing of the party.

Fourth Tier President Clinton had to play with the Republicans to stay in office, and he got none of the major reforms he wanted such as national healthcare, etc. But unfortunately we had to still be forced to endure the Monica Lewinsky ordeal.

Salinas chides Bush for spending and record deficits, but he in no way accounts for September 11th and the war in his blame. In fact, unemployment is now even less than it was under Reagan and Clinton, and recent government revenues thanks to the Bush Tax Cuts have put more money into government cofers than ever before, and still the democrats complain.

Mohammed even attacks Rush Limbaugh for calling "democrats and liberals 'anti-American.'" Well they are. He even criticizes Rush for dropping "out of college his freshman year and avoided Vietnam because of a cyst, he did have a distinct talent to talk." Yet Salinas probably praises Al Franken and Air America for the ability to talk, and don't forget they just went broke. Being a war veteran myself, I have no problem with people who did not serve the military. The real question is -- did they support the military. Rush Limbaugh has never turned his back on the military, unlike the likes of Salinas and Franken.

Salinas wrote, "in 1988, [Rush's] radio program became nationally syndicated and took off. Because of his popularity, some Republicans [thankfully] made the mistake of following him" and they won back the Congress in the second year of [Fourth Tiered] President Clinton's first term. See what I noted about bipartisanship earlier. Democrats will never act bipartisan towards Republicans, it's alway Republicans acting bipartisan towards liberals.

And get this. I love when Salinas wrote, "in 1994, after calling liberal women 'feminazis' and referring to then 13-year-old Chelsea Clinton as 'the family dog,' Republicans named him 'an honorary member of Congress.' And Mohammed goes on to blame Rush's partisan rhetoric on how the exteme left operates today. It's completely crazy folks, and you UH weak minded students, don't you fall for it one bit.

The democrats themselves let themselves be taken over by partisan hacks such as the MoveOn.orgers, Howard Dean, George Soros, and his group of malcontents. They won't give us their plan, because if they were honest and gave us their plans, the people would think the libs were as extreme as Stalin.

Near the end of Mohammed's dragging tripe he noted liberal radio show host Ed Shultz, and of a liberal blogger who "'outed' a supposed gay Republican senator. Salinas wrote, "thankfully, the 'liberal media' didn't cover this issue or name him, mainly because Conservative bloggers have alot of ammunition on liberal Senator Harry Reid, whose Shady Land Deals and Illegal Use of Campaign Funds have recently come to light, and are much worse than outing someone.

For you liberals who want to be "Shultz Shafted," Ed is on AM 740 at night when nobody is listening, because if 740 ran his tripe during the day, they would go the way of Air America. Broke.

Mohammed lastly appeals to his fellow liberals, that "in two weeks, people won’t be voting to make some partisan squeal with delight as if their football team won. They are voting for change, for progress (code word for liberalism), and this can only be achieved by adults who believe in bipartisanship (means Republicans voting with liberals or stayiing home).

Don't let Salinas fool you folks with his liberal code-words, or your dreams will go up in smoke as the United States works in bipartisanship with North Korea and Iran. After that, it won't matter.

Screw the Godless libs and the dem-leaning Mods!

Friday, October 20, 2006


Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Hasan Rizvi 'Please Spare NorKom People' (Al-Qaeda will need their help to kill Americans later)

Man, al-UH Daily Cougar Macaca Columnist and future al-Qaeda Finance Minister Hasan Rizvi really cares about the North Korean (NorKom) people.

Did you know that NorKom people live in an oppressed society and hardly don't have anything to eat. My God, where is the liberal outraged?

I mean, the liberals will insist that we go halfway around the World to Somalia to help those with hardly anything to eat, only to cut-and-run when pressed.

In his tripe today "Keep Korean people in mind," Rizvi wants us to keep our minds on the most mind-numbed people in the World -- the innocent NorKoms.

I say forget it Rizvi, all aid that has been "earmarked" for the NorKom people has went straight to the North Korean Army. And you know that the pot-bellied, dog eating dictator will never allow inspectors into North Korea to check for something as simple as that.

Thankfully Rizvi recognizes that "Kim Jong-Il’s propaganda says that the people of North Korea are the 'happiest and freest people in the world,' but the opposite is closer to the truth."

Rizvi gives us his swan song over the NorKom peoples daily intake. For instance, "the average daily intake for a North Korean is 600 calories, one-fourth of what the human body usually requires." Who cares? Kim Jong-Il doesn't.

The Clinton Administration was fooled by the NorKom's when we gave their people food, and I would argue that the Clinton's knew that the food we donated to NorKom's was going straight to their army, when at the same time "as many as 3 million may have starved to death; others barely got by consuming things such as boiled grass." Hell, back then the Clinton Administration would do anything for good poll numbers.

Hasan Rizvi sees the NorKom leader as "indifferent to the suffering of innocent people" but he doesn't condemn Kim Jong-Il. To Hasan, its about how "we should not repeat the mistakes we made when dealing with Saddam Hussein’s regime."

Hasan is afraid that UN imposed sanctions will allow the NorKom people to suffer even more, and of course it will be the United States' fault. Who cares? Liberals don't, all they want is power back, and they don't care who they destroy or who has to die for them to get it.

So why spare the North Korean people in the hunt for Kim Jong-Il? Because the NorKom's are a people that hate the United States, and al-Qaeda needs all the friends it can get.

Screw the Godless libs and the dem-leaning Mods!


Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Dawn Rorie 'Knows Christian Conservatives Will Vote' (Now calling Foley a pedophile, when he had no sex with teens)

The liberals attempts to oust Republicans by scandal, because they know they can't oust them via the ballot box is still continuing to fail. I don't know who those so-called "Christian Conservatives" are that the liberal media are talking to, but the ones that I know are itching to vote, and overwhelmingly VOTE REPUBLICAN.

My God, you now have the liberal Nick Lampson running an "ATTACK AD" against his Write-in opponent Shelly Sekula-Gibbs for District 22. Lampson's actions really projects an aire of reality into his campaign, and he is confidently desperate since he's down by double-digits in the polls.

Liberals, the gig is up. Times have changed. People are not as stupid as you think not to think about national security first when they step near that voting machine. Because to have racism, to have abortion, to have welfare, and to be soft on dangerous criminals, all the things that liberals want, you have to have a safe America. Safe from terrorist attack and the threat of attack.

Efforts to keep the Foley scandal going are worthless. The weirdo is gone, and there is a replacement candidate in his place. But why the switch from tainting Foley from gay to a pedophile. I know why, and in comes in the form of Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist and Houston Voice writer Crystal "Meth" Dawn Rorie who has laid down a thick layer of goop for UH weak minded students to wade through along with all that rain we got recently.

In her tripe yesterday "GOP spreads false info about pedophilia," Crystal Dawn, UH's own little English lesbian whore, who will soon be serving hamburgers and fries at the local Montrose Burger King, is doing the bidding of the Gay publication The Houston Voice and trying to persuade her ten readers that Foley is a pedophile, when it has been proven he had no sex with anyone underage.

It was the Democrat Party's idea of "outing gays" in the Republican Party in hopes of convincing Christian Conservatives not to vote that paid too much attention to the cause of the gays. We haven't heard anything of that so-called "list of Gay-Republicans" because it rubbed liberal gays the wrong way, and made them look to themselves as deviants. Hence we get Crystal Dawn trying to write her version of the story that Foley is a pedophile, when he has no such history. I'm not defending Foley for his stupid actions, but damnit, he is a gay man and not a pedophile.

If you want to talk Gay pedophile, let's talk liberal Gary Studds who had sex with a 17 year old male page. Studd's wanted the boy so bad that he took him to Morocco to boink his brains out. Congress censured Studds for boinking the boy, and Studd's district was stupid enough to re-elect him until he retired in 1996. Of course Rorie couldn't reach Studds for comment because he recently died, presumably after having sex with an underaged male.

Rorie starts off her lying tripe with "Mark Foley knew the last thing the Republican Party needed in the weeks leading up to the midterm elections was a sex scandal -- especially one involving a congressman, sexually explicit e-mails and underage boys."

Of course Crystal Dawn Rorie won't tell you that the e-mails are three years old, the boy was actually an adult, and it was the IM's, which I've never heard of anyone saving ever, that caused the whole scandal. Foley was a setup from the beginning, and quite frankly it did not work.

Rorie also will not tell you that the e-mails were shopped around to the media for almost a year by democrat operatives, and that the FBI said the e-mails showed signs of being tampered with. Foley was a politically timed event, which if the gas prices were not headed down, the Dow not headed up, and the President's poll numbers not headed up, would still be in the democrat jack-in-the-box waiting to be sprung about ten days before the November elections. But since everything is going good, Foley was the only issue in the democrats bag and they had to spring him on the public.

When you really think about it, using Foley as their only issue makes a sad case for the democrats. Foley is being used to taint the Republicans as a bunch of "gays" so that the Christian and Principled Conservatives will stay home come election day. Foley should have been welcomed by the gay community when he announced he was gay. The only confirmed pedophile that I know of in the Congress was Studds, and to say that Foley is one without proof is, well, that how liberalism works.

As far as I'm concerned Republican efforts to counter the liberals on the Foley damage have been tame. The Conservative bloggers have been instrumental in pointing fact after fact about the scandal, and that the whole thing was really a SET-UP. Liberals have spewed lie after lie about the pervert Foley trying to damage the Republican Party as a whole, and I'm confident that they will be surprised come election day about how much it will hurt the democrat party.

Hell, when the democrats have to borrow money ($5 mil) to run their campaign, that stinks to high heaven to me. There are more democrat millionaires in the Senate than Republicans, and the democrats are seen as the party of the poor people? And these poor people who never seem to get out of the dumps, yet they still depend heavily on the liberals.

Crystal Dawn Rorie hopes to be one of those liberals that the poor depend on in the future, and she will use every GOP scandal she can get her hands on to get there.

Screw the Godless libs and the dem-leaning Mods!

Wednesday, October 18, 2006


Al-Qaeda Supporting Democrats to Win the Mid-Term Elections (Expect their pre-election message of hope for Democrats soon)

The following is the presumed Al-Qaeda pre-election message of hope and support for the Democrat Party in the 2006 mid-term elections against the mean and viscious party of American aggression towards peaceful Muslim freedom fighters in Iraq, Afghanistan, and all the World.

"My Dear American Democratic Party Friends, fellow George Bush haters, and American Imperialists Army and Navy haters:

Osama Bin Laden himself expresses his thanksgiving for the American Democratic Party and their highly skilled efforts along with like-minded American progressive journalists friends in the American media, to presuade Americans to support Democrats in the November mid-term elections. We need your support in the American government if we are to prevail against the American imperialists army and navy.

Osama Bin Laden is thankful for American Democrats and their like-minded American progressive journalists friends in the American media, and Osama Bin Laden himself sends an uplifting message to the Democrat Party in hopes of springing them to the polls and defeating the evil George Bush, his political devil party, and the American imperialists army and navy.

Once American Democrats win all their mid-term elections in November, I look forward to meeting with American Democrats in hopes of normalizing relations between al-Qaeda and the American Democratic Party, so that we can spread more of the Islamic faith into the American Democratic Party, plot to rid the world of the evil George Bush, his political devil party, and the American imperialists army and navy.

Allahu Akbar* and Death to America."

* Allah is the Greatest

Tuesday, October 17, 2006


Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Colin Ferguson 'Feds Need to Explore 9/11 Theories' (Actually believes 9/11 to be a Bush controlled demolition)

Did you know that Bush blew up the World Trade Center?

My God. If it weren't for brave liberals like Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Colin K. Ferguson, UH students would be the most uninformed people in America about 9/11 theories. Yeah right.

Facts man. It's about facts. We all saw those planes fly into the WTC fully loaded with fuel. There were no Bush controlled demolition teams on the ground that day; it was in the air with those ragheads flying those airplanes.

In his tripe today "Feds must address 9/11 theories," Colin Ferguson, UH's own Chicken Little, is trying to cause a little fuss over "the latest news regarding 9/11 conspiracy theories comes out of Wisconsin, where a University of Wisconsin-Madison professor likened President Bush to Adolf Hitler in materials for his course." Ho hum, another liberal professor trying to get into the spotlight, trying to compare 9/11 to Hitler's burning of the Reichstag in Nazi Germany. OK Bush is Hitler, we're all numb to those libs and their right to free speech, unlike liberals like Denise E. Hewitt who has no problem doing away with free speech when it hurts her or other liberals.

The lib prof that Colin proudly proclaims Bush is Hitler is "Kevin Barrett, the professor in question, [who] is a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, an organization that claims U.S. officials organized the attacks on the World Trade Center."

What Ferguson doesn't tell us in his tripe today was that Scholars for 9/11 Truth founder Jim Fetzer was on "The O'Reilly Factor," the other night and and Bill tore Fetzer another asshole.

Fetzer in no way presented any argument nor could he present one fact that President Bush was responsible for the 9/11 Attacks, and I was glad that O'Reilly treated him like the loon that Fetzer is.

Ferguson's blind allegiance to liberal prof's, even profs that are a half-country away calls into question his sexuality -- is he a knee bender, or not?

Ferguson evidently finds credence in the loon Barrett's argument or he wouldn't have written his tripe today. "Although many believe some or most of the official explanation, they still find reasons to doubt the whole story," Ferguson opined.

Ferguson goes on to enlighten us to more 9/11 theorist tripe by telling us of "'Loose Change,' a documentary that raises a number of questions surrounding the events of 9/11," and expounds the belief that "several of the named hijackers being alive and well in the countries of their origin." That's how crazy Colin K. Ferguson is ladies and gentlemen.

UH weak minded students. Tear out Ferguson's DC tripe today, rip it out, like those pages in the Dead Poets Society, it's pure excrement.

Ferguson's insistance that "we must entertain these alternate explanations, if only to debunk them," is completely absurd. Those libs are nothing more than people in their own internal prisons filing frivolous lawsuits about not getting enough peanut butter and crackers in their daily diets or something. It's crazy.

I would think that Kristen Young half-way thought of posting Ferguson's tripe on the funny pages. I mean really, the next thing you know Colin K. Ferguson will be writing about the conspiracy that President Roosevelt actually let the Japanese attack the US Navy Fleet at anchor in Pearl Harbor to launch us into WWII. Now that's real conspiracy.

Screw the Godless libs and the dem-leaning Mods!

Monday, October 16, 2006


Foley Scandal Pales in Comparison to Liberal Harry Reid Shady $1.1M Windfall Profit on Shady Land Deal 'No calls from liberals for Reid to RESIGN'

Liberal Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid recently hung up on an AP Reporter probing a $1.1 million dollar profit on that the democrat Senator made on land that he did not even own at the time.

The Strata-Sphere Blog with its recent post The Reid Kickbacks details a tremendous amount of damaging information, and if thing doesn't get picked up by the national media, especially the Fox News Channel, I'm going to explode. CNBC had a passing news story so far, but if the national media delays any further in its release, hell this might get released just days before the election.

Of course, this is a real liberal scandal right before an election. Where's ABC's Brian Ross when you need his lame liberal ass? Ross is only on scene when scandal hurts Republicans.

Of course, when liberals say that the media is bent Conservative this really tells the tale. Liberals leave no stone unturned when it comes to Foley, but when it comes to "Dingy" Harry and his scandal they can't even find Reid's stones, and according to The Strata-Sphere, there are sure a hell of a lot of them.

John Solomon's AP story "Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid collected a $1.1 million windfall on a Las Vegas land sale even though he hadn't personally owned the property for three years, property deeds show," shows the latest democrat culture of corruption example with Reid's land deal by lying to Congress with his disclosures noting that he still owned the land when he didn't.

Solomon's story doesn't even explain the half of the wrongdoing of "Dingy" Harry Reid with his longtime friend Jay Brown, who is a casino lawyer and somehow mixed up in organized crime. My God, if Reid were a Republican, this would dwarf even the North Korean Nuclear Crisis, but no, since Reid is a liberal, it will not hardly get any news coverage. At least not until after the election.

We haven't even got to the dealings with Harry Reid's son, who is a Clark County Nevada Commissioner, and the underhanded dealings that he has engaged in, nor how Senator Reid manipulated the Interior Department to forego regulation protecting endangered animals and environmental protections.

My God, Reid is breaking every liberal commandment from hurting endangered animals to breaking environmental regulations just to make a quick buck, and he wants to be in charge of the Senate? Who are we kidding?

"The Nevada Democrat's deal was engineered by Jay Brown, a longtime friend and former casino lawyer whose name surfaced in a major political bribery trial this summer and in other prior organized crime investigations." Brown has only had a "1981 federal securities complaint that was settled out of court" so his record is clean, but Senator Reid has broken Federal Law by knowingly misinforming the Senate of his fraudlent land deal which can net him jail time if he were to be prosecuted. No wonder he wants to pay any fines so quickly.

This whole Reid mess really stinks, and it's a goddamn shame the liberal media is still talking about Foley, when the guy is gone. I'm quite confident that Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Blogosphere are not going to let this Reid scandal go. The double standard between liberal democrats doing wrong and the liberal media not reporting their mess has got to stop. The AP started this, and by God Rush and the Conservative Blogosphere are going to finish it.

"Land deeds obtained by The Associated Press during a review of Reid's business dealings show: The deal began in 1998 when Reid bought undeveloped residential property on Las Vegas' booming outskirts for about $400,000. Reid bought one lot outright, and a second parcel jointly with Brown." Four years later, "in 2001, Reid sold the land for the same price to a limited liability corporation created by Brown" for the same price as he sold it. Look, land appreciates, and after four years, he should have made some interest in the land.

Here is where the fooling the Senate comes into play. Senator Reid "didn't disclose the sale on his annual public ethics report or tell Congress he had any stake in Brown's company. He continued to report to Congress that he personally owned the land" even when he knew he had sold the land. That breaks federal law, and we don't hear anyone calling for the liberal Reid's resignation or any investigation.

"After getting local officials [including Reid's commissioner son Rory] to rezone the property for a shopping center, Brown's company sold the land in 2004 to other developers and Reid took $1.1 million of the proceeds, nearly tripling the senator's investment. Reid reported it to Congress as a personal land sale."

And get this, democrat Senator Harry Reid, was able to ditch the most of the taxes due to the deals complexity, and still pocketed a cool mil. All of this took place three years after the land was sold by Dingy Harry and his wife.

Democrat Senator Harry Reid didn't even own the land, yet still pocketed a million bucks, he lied to Congress, and still the liberal media focuses their efforts on that Foley perv.

This will break soon.

Screw the Godless libs and the dem-leaning Mods!

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?