- WARNING TIGHT-ASSED LIBS: IF YOU CAN'T TAKE A JOKE, DON'T READ THIS BLOG!
- JOHN F. KERRY'S COMMENTS REFLECT WHAT THE DEMOCRATS TRULY THINK ABOUT OUR TROOPS
- WE ARE "pro-America" "pro-Wal-Mart" & "pro-Israel" BLOGGERS
- HOW MANY DAYS UNTIL THE LIBERAL MEDIA REPORTS ON LIBERAL SENATOR "DINGY" HARRY REID AND HIS LAND SCANDAL AND ILLEGAL USE OF CAMPAIGN FUNDS?
Friday, September 01, 2006
Expect UH Terrorist Attack by Auto Someday from Frustrated Islamo Facist on UH Infidels
Apparently it was hard to retrieve the SF motorist name, which turned out to be Omeed Aziz Popal.
Popal is a liberal media best friend -- an islamo facist, who called himself a terrorist in police custody, but of course that was downplayed by SFPD. But yell terrorist in an airport, and hey, it will land you in jail.
So what is the official 'big excuse' for the murder of "non-Muslims: He was upset over the start of his stressful arranged Islamic marriage." It's such a crock.
Debbie Schlussel points out that the "Religion of Peace" is "displaying yet more 'Peace.'" We American Infidels had better get on the ball, or sooner or later these peace loving frustrated islamic facists drivers will be including fertilizer or dirty nuclear bombs along with their frustrated driving habits.
Now on the UH campus, it is going to be pretty easy to spot a potential frustrated islamic facist auto terrorist.
Here are a few examples of what they might look like:
The frustrated islamo facist auto terrorist might also look like this:
Potential UH attacks will probably come on a Monday or Tuesday, on test days, or near Christian holidays. The frustrated islamo facist auto terrorist will use a small economical environmentally friendly car, probably green, so as not to draw suspicion in a sea of potential liberal victims at UH.
The only way to avoid attack from a frustrated islamo facist auto terrorist is to make your way around campus during islamic prayer times. A daily islamic prayer schedule can be found at this Islamic Agenda website. To be on the safe side, you might want to contact the UH Muslim Students Association to determine what 'method of calculation' they use to determine prayer times on the UH campus, or even simply ask the UHMSA when the next frustrated islamo facist auto terrorist is scheduled to strike. If they don't tell you, simply tell them the liberal line -- "it's not fair that you are not sharing this information."
The San Francisco incident is not alone. Incredibly, this past March, a University of North Carolina frustrated islamic auto terrorist, Mohammed Reza Taheri-Azar, who loves Allah and of course hates America, lovingly and peacefully "drove his Jeep into students at the University of North Carolina." This past Christmas, Ali R. Warrayat, who loves Allah, but of course hates America and Santa Clause "drove his car into a Home Depot in Arizona, for the purpose of mass destruction of the store and those in it. He wanted to set the place ablaze" in a loving and peaceful way.
A little closer to home in Texas, Dr. Wameeth Fadhli, actually in Dickinson, took an example from our bro's in the hood and did a drive-by "random" shooting of a bicyclist; while in Baltimore, Mujtaba Rabbani Jabbar, who in the name of the Religion of Peace shot and killed a Jewish customer at a movie palace. And finally, in the liberal home of bad coffee, Seattle, frustrated islamic facist auto terrorist Naveed Haq went on a shooting spree at the Jewish Federation killing at least one person.
UH, don't say I didn't warn you. Campus liberalism is no protection against frustrated islamo facist auto terrorist. In fact, if the islamo facist ever gain power in US government, liberals will be the first to be exterminated just as the Jews were under Hitler in WWII.
Hattip to Debbie Schlussel.
Screw the libs!
by Eric Margolis
by Eric Margolis
The latest big lie unveiled by Washington’s neoconservatives are the poisonous terms, "Islamo-Fascists" and "Islamic Fascists." They are the new, hot buzzwords among America’s far right and Christian fundamentalists.
President George W. Bush made a point last week of using "Islamofacists" when recently speaking of Hezbullah and Hamas – both, by the way, democratically elected parties. A Canadian government minister from the Conservative Party compared Lebanon’s Hezbullah to Nazi Germany.
The term "Islamofascist" is utterly without meaning, but packed with emotional explosives. It is a propaganda creation worthy Dr. Goebbels, and the latest expression of the big lie technique being used by neocons in Washington’s propaganda war against its enemies in the Muslim World.
This ugly term was probably first coined in Israel – as was the other hugely successful propaganda term, "terrorism" – to dehumanize and demonize opponents and deny them any rational political motivation, hence removing any need to deal with their grievances and demands.
As the brilliant humanist Sir Peter Ustinov so succinctly put it, "Terrorism is the war of the poor, and war is the terrorism of the rich."
Both the terms "terrorism" and "fascist" have been so abused and overused that they have lost any original meaning. The best modern definition I’ve read of fascism comes in former Columbia University Professor Robert Paxton’s superb 2004 book, The Anatomy of Fascism.
Paxton defines fascism’s essence, which he aptly terms its "emotional lava" as: 1. a sense of overwhelming crisis beyond reach of traditional solutions; 2. belief one’s group is the victim, justifying any action without legal or moral limits; 3. need for authority by a natural leader above the law, relying on the superiority of his instincts; 4. right of the chosen people to dominate others without legal or moral restraint; 5. fear of foreign "contamination."
Fascism demands a succession of wars, foreign conquests, and national threats to keep the nation in a state of fear, anxiety and patriotic hypertension. Those who disagree are branded ideological traitors. All successful fascists regimes, Paxton points out, allied themselves to traditional conservative parties, and to the military-industrial complex.
Highly conservative and militaristic regimes are not necessarily fascist, says Paxton. True fascism requires relentless aggression abroad and a semi-religious adoration of the regime at home.
None of the many Muslim groups opposing US-British control of the Mideast fit Paxton’s definitive analysis. The only truly fascist group ever to emerge in the Mideast was Lebanon’s Maronite Christian Phalange Party in the 1930’s which, ironically, became an ally of Israel’s rightwing in the 1980’s.
It is grotesque watching the Bush Administration and Tony Blair maintain the ludicrous pretense they are re-fighting World War II. The only similarity between that era and today is the cultivation of fear, war fever and racist-religious hate by US neoconservatives and America’s religious far right, which is now boiling with hatred for anything Muslim.
Under the guise of fighting a "third world war" against "Islamic fascism," America’s far right is infecting its own nation with the harbingers of WWII totalitarianism.
In the western world, hatred of Muslims has become a key ideological hallmark of rightwing parties. We see this overtly in the United States, France, Italy, Holland, Denmark, Poland, and, most lately, Canada, and more subtly expressed in Britain and Belgium. The huge uproar over blatantly anti-Muslim cartoons published in Denmark laid bare the seething Islamophobia spreading through western society.
There is nothing in any part of the Muslim World that resembles the corporate fascist states of western history. In fact, clan and tribal-based traditional Islamic society, with its fragmented power structures, local loyalties, and consensus decision-making, is about as far as possible from western industrial state fascism.
The Muslim World is replete with brutal dictatorships, feudal monarchies, and corrupt military-run states, but none of these regimes, however deplorable, fits the standard definition of fascism. Most, in fact, are America’s allies.
Nor do underground Islamic militant groups ("terrorists" in western terminology). They are either focused on liberating land from foreign occupation, overthrowing "un-Islamic" regimes, driving western influence from their region, or imposing theocracy based on early Islamic democracy.
Claims by fevered neoconservatives that Muslim radicals plan to somehow impose a worldwide Islamic caliphate are lurid fantasies worthy of Dr. Fu Manchu and yet another example of the big lie technique that worked so well over Iraq.
As Prof. Andrew Bosworth notes in an incisive essay on so-called Islamic fascism, "Islamic fundamentalism is a transnational movement inherently opposed to the pseudo-nationalism necessary for fascism."
However, there are plenty of modern fascists. But to find them, you have to go to North America and Europe. These neo-fascists advocate "preemptive attacks against all potential enemies," grabbing other nation’s resources, overthrowing uncooperative governments, military dominance of the world, hatred of Semites (Muslims in this case), adherence to biblical prophecies, hatred of all who fail to agree, intensified police controls, and curtailment of "liberal" political rights.
They revel in flag-waving, patriotic melodrama, demonstrations of military power, and use the mantle of patriotism to feather the nests of the military-industrial complex, colluding legislators and lobbyists. They urge war to the death, fought, of course, by other people’s children. They have turned important sectors of the media into propaganda organs and brought the Pentagon largely under their control.
Now, the neoconservatives are busy whipping up war against Syria and Iran to keep themselves in power and maintain the political dynamics of this 21st century revival of fascism.
The real modern fascists are not in the Muslim World, but Washington. The neocons screaming fascist the loudest, are the true fascists themselves. It’s a pity that communist and leftist propaganda so debased the term "neo-fascist" that it has become almost meaningless. Because that is what we should be calling the so-called neocons, for that is what they really are.
August 29, 2006
Eric Margolis [send him mail], contributing foreign editor for Sun National Media Canada, is the author of War at the Top of the World. See his website.
Copyright © 2006 Eric Margolis
Islamo-facists begin negotiations by demanding our deaths.
In time, if liberals ever regain control, 3-5 years following that, we will have a nuclear or dirty bomb exploded in our country.
By liberals wanting to "cut and run" and continue to be "unpatriotic" they give hope to the enemy, who are already here by the way.
In the end, I fear all people of islamic faith living in the west will be rounded up, and either be killed or deported.
Look, even doves will be forced to fight. Stephen F. Austin, advocated Texican loyalty to Mexico until they crossed his ass, and then he encouraged war against Mexico.
Once that nuclear device is exploded in the US, and it will be. And we can only hope that this event happens in a blue state. Then and only then, will uninformed Americans be truly understanding of what is going on against the islamo-facists.
Links to this post: