.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}
EIB Bumpersticker

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

 

A Few Random Thoughts - XXXV

- Radical liberalism is much worse than anything Christian.

- Clinton was so pissed following Fox's Chris Wallace interview Der Schlick Meister threatened to fire his entire staff.

- With forty-something days to go until the election, gas prices are down, the Stock Market is near all-time highs, consumer confidence is up, unemployment is down, and liberals can't get racism charges to stick.

- How come the liberal media never shows any good news coming from Iraq or Afghanistan? Schools, roads, and hospitals are always being built, our soldiers are training their soldiers, and we hear nothing.

- There are no "honest" liberals.

- Abortion and liberal alternative lifestyles have played hell on the democrat parties future voting base. And liberals still try to blame the GOP.

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

 

Liberals Trying to Get Their Stories Straight about Upcoming November Election Loss

The Cybercast News Service reported yesterday in their news story "America's Voting Machines Still Flawed, Democrat Alleges," that "American voters will still be dissatisfied after this November's mid-term elections," thus setting the liberals up for another disappointing loss come November. Stories about this have been popping up about once or twice a week for a while now.

Of course, you wouldn't be seeing stories like this if the liberals were thinking that they were actually going to win. These stories are being planted now to show a trail of mistrust and deceit in the election system, not to mention that low showing in democrat primaries cannot possibly turn into control of the House much less the Senate.

Somehow, just somehow, everywhere election fraud is taking place in the democrat mind, and its the Republicans fault. Its getting so bad that liberal Congressman Rush Holt, from New Jersey, wants to make sure that you vote democrat with his house bill "aimed at making election results more verifiable." Meaning, he wants to know who you voted for.

Come on, this is 2006. Its not like in the times when democrats were imposing literacy tests and poll taxes on Blacks trying to vote in their White Primaries.

Democrats are the ones cheating in elections. Why do you think that they vote against simply showing some piece of identification just to vote. In society, everyone must carry identification, and not to do so will land you in a world of trouble. The only reason liberals are against showing identifications at elections is because it lessens their guys chances of cheating in elections. Its not about being rich or poor, everyone carries ID, its about being truthful in who you are at election time. Look if the GOP were dishonest at election time, you damn would sure be hearing about it all the time.

The liberals call for a paper trail in elections has never been called for before, but then again, the libs haven't been in such a pinch as they are now, literally on the edge of total destruction, with Blacks fleeing the liberal plantation of intellectual slavery in droves, and the Hispanics not signing up to become democrats despite the wave of summer protest, the tidal wave of despair looms heavy on the liberals and the democrat party.

"Holt called the current [election] system "troublesome" and warned that "we are not ready for 2006." Well the liberals might not be ready, but the GOP damn sure is.

Liberals have to smear in campaigns, that's all they got. They have no issues to run on. Their polls are meaningless. Their attempts to shape public opinion via polling is meaningless. They continue to use an old, pre-internet, pre-90's political playbook, and they continue to believe their own polling numbers.

Screw the Godless libs!

Monday, September 25, 2006

 

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist David Salinas 'Dems Strong in Senate Races' (If libs win; al-Qaeda wins)

Got to prep for something, so I ain't got much time today.

Bottom line. In al-UH Daily Cougar columnist and resident cotton picker David Mohammed Salinas tripe today, one can imagine him as Hitler in his nearly surrounded Berlin bunker moving ghostly divisions around on a map while still giving the illusion to his peeps that all is well and that they will be saved.

That is the state of the democrat party. Liberalism built on an illusion of lies, and they still believe it.

Screw the Godless libs.


 

Clinton Combative Trying to Claim He Wanted to Kill UBL in Fox Interview

I think Fox News Sunday's ratings just went up.

It's starting to slowly get out there that former connoisseur-in-chief of White House blowjobs Bill Clinton threw a hissy fit on "Fox News Sunday" with Anchor Chris Wallace over the weekend.

"In a combative interview on "Fox News Sunday," former President Clinton defended his handling of the threat posed by Osama bin Laden, saying he tried to have bin Laden killed and was attacked for his efforts by the same people who now criticize him for not doing enough." EXCREMENT. TOTAL EXCREMENT.

The interview was conducted during the three-day conference of the "Clinton Global Initiative," a thinktank devoted to coaching young women and girls proper oral sex techniques, so that pervs like Bill can continue to get some.

The combative interview is a result of a man looking for a Presidential legacy, which in the minds of many Americans is ensconced firmly on a blue stained dress with Clinton Presidential semen that should be in that double-wide brothel library in Little Rock.

"They ridiculed me for trying [to kill UBL]," Clinton said, but as we can see in the movie and read in testimony by Clinton aides, Der Schlick Meister was much more interested in oral sex, focus groups, and his poll numbers than he was in getting UBL.

When he was asked "Did you do enough to connect the dots and go after Al Qaida?" "Clinton accused host Chris Wallace of a "conservative hit job" and asked: "I want to know how many people in the Bush administration you asked, 'Why didn't you do anything about the Cole?' I want to know how many people you asked, 'Why did you fire Dick Clarke?'"" Boy, Clinton be pissed. But the Cole happened on his watch, and he didn't do anything about it either.

"Clinton said he "worked hard" to try to kill bin Laden, but we all know that there was something much HARDER he was working with when he sprinkled Monica Lewinsky with his love juice, instead of tending to "official" national affairs.


In the interview Clinton said, "We contracted with people to kill him. I got closer to killing him than anybody's gotten since," but we know when it came to pulling the trigger, that the buck stopped somewhere else down the hall from the Oval Office, and nobody wanted to take responsibility when Clinton wouldn't back them.

Clinton told Wallace, "And you got that little smirk on your face and you think you're so clever, but I had responsibility for trying to protect this country." That right there should have made Wallace break out into laughter.

Over course, on liberal NBC's "Meet the Press," Tim Russert brought his soft ball and Clinton creamed him just like he did Monica Lewinsky.

Screw the Godless libs!

Thursday, September 21, 2006

 

Wal-Mart Says "Shove it" to democrats: Will Sell Generic Drugs for $4

Boy, you liberals have pissed them off. Wal-Mart, who is being targeted by the democrat party and liberals as an issue this election season is fighting back on all fronts from the flak they have been getting from the Chicago city council all the way up to libs in Congress and the DNC.

The AP Story "Wal-Mart to Sell Generic Drugs for $4," is in response to Wal-Mart not being allowed to build stores in Chicago, being overtaxed in Maryland, and vilified by liberals from the DC, WIN, to the New York Times.

Wal-Mart has been fighting back. Whether it be by building stores one-block outside of Chicago city limits or fighting the liberals in court, and now with the generic drugs plan, the liberals are losing on all fronts. Liberals actually think Wal-Mart will just sit there and take the crap they are getting from the democrat party and the liberals. No way.

Wal-Marts plans to start selling a months supply of generic prescription drugs in the Tampa, Florida area on Friday and spread the liberal fighting concept to the whole state by the end of the year, and to many other states by next year.

As I write this, I'm buying another 100 shares of Wal-Mart just to piss you libs off.

Wal-Mart's program cuts by half as much as six times what other suppliers are charging their customers on nearly 300 commonly prescribed generic drugs, with a savings of 70% expect for most heartland customers. Unfortunately, those living in liberal meccas that refuse to let Wal-Mart in and thus do not share in sales tax revenue, such as Chicago, will be losing out on those customers that need to get their medications and also need to get another handy item which is taxed.

Tough luck liberals. It's just another shot in your foot.

We are Pro-Wal-Mart bloggers.

Screw the Godless libs!

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

 

The al-UH Daily Cougar 'The Never Offenders of Islam' (But hell with Christianity -- its OPEN SEASON)

Be rest assured that the liberals at the al-UH Daily Cougar would never print a muhammad caricature for fear that they might offend al-UH columnist and failed al-Qaeda suicide bomber Adil Saleem, as well as the much feared UH Muslim Students Association.

But hell, with Our Lord Jesus Christ, liberals consider it open season on God at the al-UH Daily Cougar since only one-quarter of all liberals consider themselves to be Worshippers of the Cross.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
Austin Havican is no different among the heavy haired, bearded, and unbathed liberals on the UH campus, except that he expresses his hate for Christianity in cartoon form. Just by looking at him, you can tell he ain't no Christian, and hence we get today's editorial cartoon.

.
.
Screw the Godless libs!

Monday, September 18, 2006

 

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Adil Saleem 'Just Stop Writing Bad Things About Americans' (We know you want to kill us -- so just start w/UH liberals)

Today we get a good dose of the true side of liberalism and the War on Terror. These people, who hate everything that the United States stands for in its own defense. These people who hate Christianity and adore Islam. These people who if they don't convert will happily be killed by followers of "The Religion of Peace." These people who want to extend a Terrorists Bill of Rights to al-Qaeda bad people who never have heard of Geneva.

The ridiculous idea that the few incidents such as abu ghraib overrule beheadings by al-Qaeda, which the liberals refuse to show yet they push all possible offenses to show the world how bad Americans are in the War on Terror. Do you know that now that Iraqi forces have taken over abu ghraib, the prisoners there now want the US forces back.

Today
al-UH Daily Cougar columnist and failed al-Qaeda suicide bomber Adil Saleem expresses his hate for the United States and support for his old buds in al-Qaeda by picking words and sentences and trying his best to use them against President Bush.

My God, liberals like
Saleem are more interested in protecting terrorists than protecting American citizens. My guess is he really doesn't care about America at all. In his tripe today "What does Iraq have to do with it?," Adil Saleem, who actually watched the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric last week, cited President Bush as saying, "One of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror."

Big whoops. We are in Iraq. And if the US wasn't there, we would be having to deal with both Iran and Iraq in the future, when both would have been appeased fully functional nuclear weapons on the black market thanks to liberals.

Saleem's assertion that "logical individuals should wonder why connecting Iraq to the war on terror is difficult," is an al-Qaeda friendly statement. Hence his affliation with the party of "reaction" -- the democrat party. Al-Qaeda was at war with the US long before 9/11, but liberals like Adil Saleem what you UH weak minded students to believe it actually started on Bush's watch. Well, the ABC mini-series "The Path to 9/11" settled that and blamed it on Clinton lack of action.

On a day when Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is given an almost angelic appearance on Time's cover magazine, while Conservatives are always potrayed badly on liberal covers. The Time cover shows how America's liberals are trying to be liked by Iran, by al-Qaeda, Hamas, etc., but those are the same people that call for those same liberals death. These people are our enemies and are laughing at us while at the same time plotting to kill us.

The active Presidency of George W. Bush (which offends
Saleem) has to be on the offense following the reactive and focus grouped Presidency of Bill Clinton. We can't afford to sit back and let the terrorist strike because, the next time they might use nuclear or chemical weapons, and that will turn everyone against being a dove.

Adil Saleem's insistance that President Bush tie Iraq to 9/11 is crazy. Who cares? Liberals did care about Clinton and Monica Lewinsky. Conservatives don't care about al-Qaeda ties to Iraq. But in time it will be proven. Yes, while Clinton was busy given Monica Lewinsky facials, and at the same time he was being neglectful in killing Bin Laden, yet good 'ol Adil blames Bush for 9/11.

They are connected
Saleem, and I will not be intimidated by your statement "the next time you hear a conservative say Saddam Hussein and 9/11 are connected and the U.S. is in Iraq to fight the terrorists who bombed us, calmly point out the facts Bush has stated himself."

Adil Saleem, if you love Allah so much, then go the next step. Don't just write bad things against Americans. Do bad things to the United States. Honestly, if islamo facists were the rulers of the United States, would not gays and liberals be the first to be killed. Well, you are surrounded by gays and liberals at UH. So do your part to get your 72 virgins.

Abraham Lincoln's statement that "A House Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand." Well, we are divided.
Saleem, you are a divider, and in the name of Allah -- I call on you to commit suicide. The next GLBT, or Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered meeting on campus will be a good start.

Screw the Godless libs!

Thursday, September 14, 2006

 

NOW Bitch: "Bush Got You Down?"

How miserable must a person be to title her NOW, or as I call them NAGs, 'Below the Belt' column, "Bush Got You Down?"

Yes, NAG President Kim Gandy is trying to brighten her amazon troops by saying "He's [meaning President George W. Bush] been in the news a lot lately, spreading cheerful [good news]", which Gandy labels as "misinformation," "with the help of his media allies," whom, except maybe FOX, I do not know who they would be?

Gandy continues "in the coming weeks, we have the opportunity to make real change by increasing the number of feminist [amazons] in our government." Fat chance, hell, the latest all women's radion network, comprised of WPMS, WCRY, WDYK, WBCH, have been announced and will have nothing except sewing and cooking, and woman things. Do amazons do any of that stuff? Of course it will go broke like Air America.

Gandy, she is so liberal that she wants insurance to cover birth control of all things. My God, just act responsibly in your one-night stands bitches -- in the spirt of Bill Clinton just give some "head" instead of having sex, or hell, I don't mind lesbian relationships as long as the girls are both hot.

With the NAGs its always abortion. Abortion this and abortion that, the "current Congress has been more invested in criminalizing an aunt or grandmother who might help a niece or granddaughter obtain an abortion in the next state." Good, then maybe we won't have to let so many immigrants. The NAGs have supported the abortion of tens of millions of voters, whom probably most would have been members of the democrat party.

When I say do away with the minimum wage. People are not stupid, and they know how much jobs are worth, Gandy's still insist that in regards to the minimum wage, "we're hard-pressed to find a majority of elected officials who care about anyone's human needs, let alone women's." Again BS coming from the NAG leader.

The minimum wage is just another example of liberals wanting to control peoples lives. Nobody in their right mind will work for $2/hr any more, its not physically possible to work for that amount of money and maintain a living. The minimum wage is just a control knob for the liberals. It's definitely not designed to raise a family on these days.

To show much liberals care about control the poor they voted down a minimum wage increase over the summer. So what if the wage increase was tied to a tax decrease, the fact is that liberals care more about tax increases than they do about minimum wage increases. That's the resolve of liberals -- more money in the liberals pockets now, and no extra money in the poor people pockets later.

And let's face it. If there weren't any poor, who would the liberals constituency be? Inner city blacks have purposely been designed to be kept that way by the liberals, the Jackson's and the Sharpton's, etc. Have you ever heard a message of economic hope come from their mouths that touts economic opportunity by getting your education and increasing your self-esteem -- NO. To them libs, if the government isn't going to do it for you, then nobody is.

The same goes for the Hispanic community. You have to lift yourself up by your own bootstraps. Nobody in the liberal community ever stresses saving for your own future. Open a savings account, watch the power of compound interest, save.

The NAGs can go ahead and express joy at the few successes of their amazon candidates last Tuesday, but when November rolls around they will be giving out the same story as last election. "We gave it a shot, buy came up short."

Screw the Godless libs!

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

 

Former Clinton Aide: Path to 9/11 Was Very, Very Accurate

Their crapping their pants folks. Yes liberals, those of the democrat party, are crapping their pants, and they are crying like stuck pigs.

In a recent AgapePress story "Former Clinton Aide Critical of Attempts to Shut Down ABC's 9/11 Special," reporter Chad Groening interviewed a former Clinton aide who carried the nuclear football, and was duty-bound to be by the President's side at all times during his shifts as Clinton's military attaché.

Yes, "retired Air Force Lt. Col. Buzz Patterson says his former boss had several chances to nab terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden."

"The Path to 9/11" which was "lambasted by the former Chief Executive and his advisers was, in fact, very accurate." Thankfully very little was cut from the movie, and really showed the real Clinton Administration minus the SPIN.

ABC labeled "The Path to 9/11" as fictionalized following the first night, and a docudrama following the second night. President Bush's speech on the second night was "right on," and liberals in showing their disgust for his speech, are showing the American people how they are further aligning themselves with al-Qaeda.

Thank God some Republicans with balls are starting to label those in the democrat party as terrorists sympathizers rather than American defenders. We need more of that GOP speak.

Have any liberals condemned al-Qaeda? Have liberals ever condemned the beheadings of Americans?

No, liberals defend the treatment of al-Qaeda prisoners. Liberals are concerned about detainees getting their korans, their islamic prepared meals, and ensuring that detainees make it to prayer sessions on time. While at the same time liberals ensure that every publicly displayed Bible and Ten Commandments is pulled from the sight of just one offended person.

"The 9/11 Commission Report" and other sources were the inspiration for the movie. Everyone knows the events of that fateful day, but many were unaware of the events that lead up to the Twin Towers. Now they know. They events were presented in a fair and truthful manner, in a way that heartlanders will dispute despite what the liberal media throws at them.

I'm growing more and more confident about a GOP sweep in November. Americans are starting to awake from their electoral slumber and starting to pay attention to really whats going on out there. Its incredible that some liberals still actually believe that President Bush actually blew up the WTC and instructed the terrorist controlled planes to fly straight into them.

There are alot of sick members of the democrat party out their. They forsook the Black vote, and now the "Larry X" types as shown in a recent story are abandoning the democrat party in droves. They are about the very few instead of the many. Hence my confidence is building and building rapidly.

Col. Patterson is certain that if Clinton would have acted just once (in like eight times Bill had a chance to get UBL) the events such as the "the bombings of the embassies in Africa" and "the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole." Patterson also said, "I think President Bill Clinton is responsible for 9/11 and the war on terror, personally. That is his legacy." And don't forget that blowjobs are Clinton's legacy too.

Screw the Godless libs!

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

 

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist David Salinas 'A Kool-Aid Believer in liberalism' (Concerned about GOP using liberal speak as weapon in November)

All hail the great perpetual believer of liberalism, wacko David Salinas!

Just think, by this time next year al-UH Daily Cougar columnist and resident cotton picker David Mohammed Salinas will probably be unemployed and thinking that he might have a shot at the local Burger King if he posts his political science degree on his application.

My God Salinas is a loon. In his tripe "Negative campaign unneeded," Salinas insist that the liberals are "poised to take control of the House and with an outside shot at the Senate." Obviously, Salinas hasn't been reading liberal rags lately that suggest that the democrat party is in trouble come November. Stories in the LA Times, NY Times, The Hill, the Philadelphia Inquirer and even a Zobgy poll shows Santorum surging in Pennsylvania. I suppose, when you drink too much kool-aid such as David has, he'll support the democrat party and its nullity where the buck stops down the hall and not in the Clinton oval orifice.

David Mohammed Salinas is worried that with time dwindling in the 2006 campaign "Republicans have pledged to spend millions "going negative," and that fully 90% of the fifty million dollar ad budget is to be spent "exclusively on negative ads."

Mohammed's claim that "one part of the coming negative blitz will deal with the preposterous notion that voting Democratic somehow weakens the security of this country." Mohammed who are you kidding man? UBL practically endorses the democrat party, and I still stand-by my claim that if the liberals ever regain power that we can expect a nuclear, biological, or dirty bomb within just a few years of them taking the reigns.

Let me ask you a question Mohammed. If you were in charge of our nation's security, would terrorism still be treated "as a law enforcement problem." Would terrorists be given an equal opportunity to kill innocent American kids or would you act in defense only after the fact.

Folks we can't trust David Mohammed Salinas to secure his own dorm room and personal effects, and he wants the liberals to be in charge of our national security.

Salinas is so desperate that he berates the ABC movie "The Path to 9/11," which displayed that the War on Terror in no way started on 9/11/2001, but that it was Clinton inaction (due to vane attempts to maintain his poll numbers) during the 1990's that emboldened the terrorists to actually go thru with attacking the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

Salinas chides Vice President Cheney, who ate Tim Russert's lunch on Meet the Press last Sunday. Now for someone who professes peace and liberalism, Salinas has an unyielding hate for Dick Cheney.

Salinas desperation continues with the Iranian-American and "Path to 9/11" writer Cyrus Nowrasteh, whom he calls "the radical right's less successful version of Michael Moore." Yes, while the Bush Administration can withstand the worthless "Fahrenheit 9/11", the Clinton Administration cannot withstand a 5-hr truthful mini-series about 1990's counterterrorism efforts.

David Salinas is so stupid, he writes "if you don't believe the film was intended to distort the truth, then explain why no changes were made to the film until former members of the Clinton administration got wind of the details."

Did President Bush call Michael Moore and demand "Fahrenheit 9/11" be changed? Yet Mohammed's eye-brows don't even get a rise when Bill Clinton calls Bob Iger over at ABC demanding that "The Path to 9/11" be cancelled entirely. That's how blind liberals are to the truth, they run and hide, and demand that things "get cancelled."

To David Mohammed Salinas liberalism is his religion and Bill Clinton is his God.

In Salinas' mind, Clinton can do no wrong. Liberals can do no wrong. If this were WWII Salinas would be a blind follower of Adolf Hitler in his bunker in Berlin, only realizing the errorof his ways when Hitler kills himself. And of course, that's too late. That's the path that the liberals and David Mohammed Salinas are leading us down -- the complete path to destruction just as Berlin was destroyed in WWII.

Mohammed's assertion that "this election cycle is the American public is not buying the argument that only Republicans can keep the country safe," is that -- just another lie. When the liberal media spreads complete negative coverage of war efforts, what do you expect from the uninformed public.

Mohammed tries to trick the UH weak minded student. He touts that some 41 democrat war veterans are running for office. Of course he doesn't mention that most if not all of those democrats are against US efforts in the War on Terror. He even found one female amputee in Illinois who is against the war and is running for office. I wouldn't trust democrat veteran candidates as far as I could thrown them.

GOP efforts in their campaign ads this November will be nothing more than Republicans using 'liberal speak' against the democrat party. But of course David Mohammed Salinas will call that negative. Yes, the crazy words of the liberals at their anti-war rallies, abortion events, etc, will be used against them, and the GOP will not say one thing.

David Mohammed Salinas desperation will grow as September rolls into November. The GOP will be accused of the most brutal crimes, the liberals will be hailed as saviors of the world, al-Qaeda will be welcomed as a friend, while American troops will be portrayed as the scourge of the Earth.

That's liberalism for you.

Screw the Godless libs!

Monday, September 11, 2006

 

September 11th ' A day in history that liberals will never want to remember' (Why? Because liberal political correctness and wimpyness caused this)

From 1993 to 2000, there were about 30 terrorist attacks, and the worthless Clinton Administration DID NOTHING because of Monica Lewinsky, and not wanting to look warlike to the world.

Fuck you liberals! Fuck you and your political correctness. Fuck you and your love for the enemy. Fuck you and your hate for the United States. Fuck you and your hate for President Bush.

To all non-liberals -- LET'S ROLL.

Fuck the Godless libs!

Saturday, September 09, 2006

 

Path to 9/11 'If ABC Cowers to Stalinists Liberals' (The current DVD version will surface on the Net)

The ABC movie "The Path to 9/11" which is set to air on Sunday (9/10) and Monday (9/11) nights, is full of controversy about how the worthless Clinton Administration of the 1990's let OBL slip away when they had him in their crosshairs and let him go, which eventually lead to 9/11.

ABC released a DVD of the movie to influentual media personnel about a week ago, and a pre-screening was shown to a bunch of liberals in DC last week as well. Thank God Rush Limbaugh also received a copy so the truth can be commented on.

The liberal showing started the liberal outrage, because evidently Clinton, nor Albright were not given pre-release DVDs. That might be ABCs saving grace for going ahead with running the movie this Sunday, or even from altering the movie so much as to put blame on the Clinton Administration. Hints of alteration may spark outrage as big as the rathergate scandal of several years ago.

We will know the morning of September 11th when Conservative Media goes on the air if ABC cowered to the stalinists liberals and made any significant alterations to the movie. If the movie is altered it will be like being attacked on 9/11 again -- this time by the liberals themselves. If liberals can't take any criticism then they shouldn't be in the spotlight.

Even with the liberals threatening ABC television and radio station licenses, ABC has no choice but to call the liberals bluff, which is tantamount to foregoing KGB directives. I will support ABC if they say "screw you" to the democrat party. But if they cower to the liberals, I'm going to take them off my TV favorites altogether.

To show how flimsy the foundation of the liberal legacy since the 1990s is, that they can't stand to have a 5-hr movie shown about them. Here is a recent letter by Senate stalinists democrat leaders forcing ABC to cancel the "Path to 9/11" miniseries. The letter is signed by Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, Assistant Democratic Leader Dick Durbin, and Senators Debbie Stabenow, Charles Schumer, and Byron Dorgan.

##################


September 7, 2006

Mr. Robert A. Iger
President and CEO
The Walt Disney Company
500 South Buena Vista Street
Burbank CA 91521


Dear Mr. Iger,

We write with serious concerns about the planned upcoming broadcast of The Path to 9/11 mini-series on September 10 and 11. Countless reports from experts on 9/11 who have viewed the program indicate numerous and serious inaccuracies that will undoubtedly serve to misinform the American people about the tragic events surrounding the terrible attacks of that day. Furthermore, the manner in which this program has been developed, funded, and advertised suggests a partisan bent unbecoming of a major company like Disney and a major and well respected news organization like ABC. We therefore urge you to cancel this broadcast to cease Disney’s plans to use it as a teaching tool in schools across America through Scholastic. Presenting such deeply flawed and factually inaccurate misinformation to the American public and to children would be a gross miscarriage of your corporate and civic responsibility to the law, to your shareholders, and to the nation.

The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest. Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in the duty of broadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting an open and accurate discussion of political ideas and events.

Disney and ABC claim this program to be based on the 9/11 Commission Report and are using that assertion as part of the promotional campaign for it. The 9/11 Commission is the most respected American authority on the 9/11 attacks, and association with it carries a special responsibility. Indeed, the very events themselves on 9/11, so tragic as they were, demand extreme care by any who attempt to use those events as part of an entertainment or educational program. To quote Steve McPhereson, president of ABC Entertainment, "When you take on the responsibility of telling the story behind such an important event, it is absolutely critical that you get it right."

Unfortunately, it appears Disney and ABC got it totally wrong.

Despite claims by your network’s representatives that The Path to 9/11 is based on the report of the 9/11 Commission, 9/11 Commissioners themselves, as well as other experts on the issues, disagree.

That Disney would seek to broadcast an admittedly and proven false recounting of the events of 9/11 raises serious questions about the motivations of its creators and those who approved the deeply flawed program. Finally, that Disney plans to air commercial-free a program that reportedly cost it $40 million to produce serves to add fuel to these concerns.

These concerns are made all the more pressing by the political leaning of and the public statements made by the writer/producer of this miniseries, Mr. Cyrus Nowrasteh, in promoting this miniseries across conservative blogs and talk shows.
Frankly, that ABC and Disney would consider airing a program that could be construed as right-wing political propaganda on such a grave and important event involving the security of our nation is a discredit both to the Disney brand and to the legacy of honesty built at ABC by honorable individuals from David Brinkley to Peter Jennings. Furthermore, that Disney would seek to use Scholastic to promote this misguided programming to American children as a substitute for factual information is a disgrace.

As 9/11 Commission member Jamie Gorelick said, "It is critically important to the safety of our nation that our citizens, and particularly our school children, understand what actually happened and why – so that we can proceed from a common understanding of what went wrong and act with unity to make our country safer."

Should Disney allow this programming to proceed as planned, the factual record, millions of viewers, countless schoolchildren, and the reputation of Disney as a corporation worthy of the trust of the American people and the United States Congress will be deeply damaged. We urge you, after full consideration of the facts, to uphold your responsibilities as a respected member of American society and as a beneficiary of the free use of the public airwaves to cancel this factually inaccurate and deeply misguided program. We look forward to hearing back from you soon.

Sincerely,


Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid
Assistant Democratic Leader Dick Durbin
Senator Debbie Stabenow
Senator Charles Schumer
Senator Byron Dorgan


##################

People, since the democrat party has built its foundation on lies, it really hurts them when the truth hits. I expect ABC to hold firm to their part of the deal, and if they don't, I don't think the liberals should expect to win anything in November.

Screw the Godless libs!

Friday, September 08, 2006

 

Check out the newest Democrat Party Weekly Paper


Check it out here.

Thursday, September 07, 2006

 

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Denise Hewitt 'Shows No Concern for Victims of Violent Crime' (Only cares about rising cost of the Death Penalty)

I once asked a liberal who hated the second amendment (for you UH weak minded students, that the Constitutional amendment that allows us to keep and bear arms) what he would do if a person was about to stab his wife and he had a gun in his hand. Essentially, the liberal would have allowed his wife to die.

We have seen it over and over again with liberals. The have no concern for the victim and a growing and forgiving respect for the killer.

A good example would be the beheading of American civilian Nick Berg in Iraq. (I've shown his beheading picture on this blog many times). His father Michael Berg is so liberal that he calls Bush the terrorist and embraces the real killers of his beheaded Son, and now he's running for Congress while trampling on the memory of his son just as Mother Sheehan did her son.

So goes it with al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Denise E. Hewitt who has only regurgitated the crap that her liberal professors and textbooks have told her, and has never formed any real opinions herself.

In her tripe today "Capital punishment raises questions," Hewitt mourns the long ago executions of gang leader and murderer Ruben Montoya Cantu and of auto mechanic and arsonist Cameron Willingham.

Cantu, as a gang leader, was involved in robbery and besides all the other people he probably killed, Cantu was convicted for the murder of Pedro Gomez and attempted murder of Juan Moreno back in the early 80's.

Cameron Willingham's death sentence was for the murder of his three kids when he set his house on fire in the early 1990's.

No matter the circumstances, liberalism, with its drive-by mentality shows absolutely no concern for the victims of violent crime. Liberals only show compassion for the person sentenced to die. And for liberal choice that Hewitt loving sides with those who kill rather than be killed.

Hewitt takes to her bleeding heart "the Houston Chronicle has presented a compelling case for Cantu's innocence, and the "expert testimony" that helped convict Willingham has been called into serious question," while not once in her tripe today did she mention the words "victim" or "family."

I don't doubt that a few men may have been executed on false testimony, but it is not a reason to put to punish the death penalty system as a whole.

Denise cites from her textbook that "capital punishment has evolved from public hangings in town squares to sterile and secluded execution chambers deep within prison complexes." She actually thinks that Cantu shouldn't have been executed, no matter how many victims and family members lives he's ruined.

Hewitt is so liberal that just because one person may have been wrongly executed that the whole process should be scrapped. She bites at the reasons for the death penalty, but even beneath that to Hewitt it comes down to cost.

Hewitt's concern is for the money that is tied up in appeals for years. Why, because it is not being spent on some stupid liberal social program that hands out condoms to pre-teens while showing them how to properly use them. To Hewitt, the families of murder victims are nothing. Families are not in the headlines; they're unseen.

Denise urges that if you are going to kill someone do it in Brazoria County. "Harris County accounts for 136 out of 396 people currently on death row, compared to neighboring Brazoria County's two," so your chances of being sentenced to death in Brazoria County are greatly reduced. The finances of cash strapped counties have DA's not pursuing the death penalty. Well maybe its time that we have a telethon that raises money for DA's across the state so that they can pursue more death penalty cases.

Thankfully Hewitt admits that "committing a heinous murder in Harris County almost guarantees a capital murder trial," and its unfortunate that "the same murder committed elsewhere in Texas may 'only' mean life in prison."

Unlike Hewitt, I am for "equal punishment" for the crime. That does not mean "life" in prison for a capital murder, it means that the murderer should be executed, and executed in a timely fashion. The death penalty does bring closure for the family of a murder victim.

About the only time I would agree with a "life" sentence in a murder case would be for the person who murders Denise E. Hewitt. That is equal punishment for the crime.

Screw the Godless libs!

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

 

No. 5 of 10 Things to Do With the al-UH Daily Cougar Besides Read It

5. Make a head cover out of it when you forgot your umbrella in your car.

 

Biblical Scholars Calculate for UN Nuclear Destruction This Month

The building is falling apart, but before it collapses on its own, biblical scholars have calculated that the UN building in NYC will undergo nuclear destruction this month.

YEEAAHHHH!!!!

And its in a Blue State too!!!

YEEAAHHHH!!!!

Screw the Godless libs!

Tuesday, September 05, 2006

 

UH's al-WIN on Channel 11's 5 o'clock Newscast

Channel 11's story "Couric in anchor chair inspiring more women to become journalists," featured al-WIN during their 5 o'clock newscast today.

Good 'ol al-WIN reporter Matt Dougherty of a "A Day in the Life of a Male Prostitute" was shown in Karla Barguiarena's piece doing a video report, probably on horse meat processing or something.

We look forward to more video news stories from al-WIN this semester. Who can forget all the great Wal-Mart bashing and prostitution enlightenment they've reported on in the past. It makes for good viewing.

Screw the Godless libs!

 

Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Colin Ferguson 'Exposing More Government Secrets' (Proudly helping al-Qaeda get the upper hand)

I've maintainted that if the liberals ever regain power that we can expect some type of nuclear attack on American soil within 3-5 years. Now I'm begining to believe that even if the libs don't regain power, that just such an attack will still occur but with the help of the liberals themeselves. That's the resolve of those selfish people who want to have total power in this country.

Just as liberals (have seen themselves and) have been silent on the Mexican 2000 type elections with Felipe Calderon now declared the winner over the childish leftist liberal Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who actions as of late have all reminded us of Algore, liberals will do everything in their power to kill Conservative leadership. The only leadership capable of defeating and not appeasing terrorism.

Today's opinion page brings us another child. Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist Colin K. Ferguson, who is afraid that the FBI might find out something about his financial background. Maybe, when he worked as a waitress at a gay bar, he might have not reported all his tip money. Who knows?

In his tripe today "FBI investigation should worry students," Colin Ferguson, UH's own Chicken Little, is trying to cause a little fuss over an FBI program trying to weed out terrorists in our liberal institutions. Evidently those FSFSA applications we fill out each year were being mined for data that might help the FBI find suspects under investigation. GOOD!

Why do liberals like Colin feel that every government secret needs to be exposed. Does he think that al-Qaeda doesn't watch al-CNN?
Ferguson quotes the FBI that "terrorists have exploited programs involving student visas and financial aid," and crticizes the FBI program Operation Strikeback, which was used to mine the Department of Education data.

What gets me, is that the FBI probably has never touch anyones records unless they were under suspicion and had an arabic sounding name.

No one really wants to see records of liberals, especially that of liberal journalist Laura McGann, who besides being mentioned in Ferguson's tripe today also refuses to shave her armpits.

It was McGann who "found the information on the FBI searches after seeing in a Government Accountability Office report that the Department of Education had been doing its share for the war on terror." McGann filed FOIA requests, did interviews, and received informaton on the program, which thankfully much much of the information was redacted, so that liberals like McGann couldn't inform al-Qaeda.

Of all the information collected by the FBI my guess would be less than one-percent of one-percent were actually pulled. Look, unless a terrorist is under investigation no government agency need not waist time and money looking at records randomly.

Ferguson's lack of concern for US government secrecy should dumbfound the UH weak minded student. His thinking that leaves "all students [applying for financial aid] to wonder if they were selected" is ridiculous.

Are liberals so arrogant to think that the government wants to know everything about them? My God, I don't want to know anything about stinking, leftist bent liberals. Especially when their every thought is the complete destruction of the American way.

While the US must leave no stone unturned in the hunt for terrorists in our midst, Ferguson is pissed that "the secretary of education is pushing for a new system that would allow the federal government to track college students throughout their entire academic careers with a comprehensive sort of transcript database called "unit records."" GOOD!

Ferguson just doesn't get it. His instance that the FBI "be forthright" with sensitive information that would give the terrorists heads-up on our plans is mindboggling.

Colin K. Ferguson, whose side are you on? Obviously, you would rather search old grandmas on airline flights than terrorists. You would want as many secret programs "outed" so that the terrorist can do something else to harm and evade authorities. Again, whose side are you on?

I hope that the FBI has has the good sense to continue the program under a different name to track student information, and that liberals like you never find out about it. Because if libs do find out -- al-Qaeda automatically knows.

Screw the Godless libs!

Friday, September 01, 2006

 

Expect UH Terrorist Attack by Auto Someday from Frustrated Islamo Facist on UH Infidels

The liberal "drive-by" media doesn't want to admit it, but we are under attack by frustrated islamo facist auto terrorist. The most recent attack happened in the Western liberal mecca of San Francisco when Jews came under attack from frustrated islamic auto terrorist "deliberately drove into lots of people and murdered at least one, critically injuring many others" until it ended near a SF Jewish Community Center.

Apparently it was hard to retrieve the SF motorist name, which turned out to be Omeed Aziz Popal.


Popal is a liberal media best friend -- an islamo facist, who called himself a terrorist in police custody, but of course that was downplayed by SFPD. But yell terrorist in an airport, and hey, it will land you in jail.

So what is the official 'big excuse' for the murder of "non-Muslims: He was upset over the start of his stressful arranged Islamic marriage." It's such a crock.

Debbie Schlussel points out that the "Religion of Peace" is "displaying yet more 'Peace.'" We American Infidels had better get on the ball, or sooner or later these peace loving frustrated islamic facists drivers will be including fertilizer or dirty nuclear bombs along with their frustrated driving habits.

Now on the UH campus, it is going to be pretty easy to spot a potential frustrated islamic facist auto terrorist.
Here are a few examples of what they might look like:













The frustrated islamo facist auto terrorist might also look like this:
a











Potential UH attacks will probably come on a Monday or Tuesday, on test days, or near Christian holidays. The frustrated islamo facist auto terrorist will use a small economical environmentally friendly car, probably green, so as not to draw suspicion in a sea of potential liberal victims at UH.

The only way to avoid attack from a frustrated islamo facist auto terrorist is to make your way around campus during islamic prayer times. A daily islamic prayer schedule can be found at this Islamic Agenda website. To be on the safe side, you might want to contact the UH Muslim Students Association to determine what 'method of calculation' they use to determine prayer times on the UH campus, or even simply ask the UHMSA when the next frustrated islamo facist auto terrorist is scheduled to strike. If they don't tell you, simply tell them the liberal line -- "it's not fair that you are not sharing this information."

The San Francisco incident is not alone. Incredibly, this past March, a University of North Carolina frustrated islamic auto terrorist, Mohammed Reza Taheri-Azar, who loves Allah and of course hates America, lovingly and peacefully "drove his Jeep into students at the University of North Carolina." This past Christmas, Ali R. Warrayat, who loves Allah, but of course hates America and Santa Clause "drove his car into a Home Depot in Arizona, for the purpose of mass destruction of the store and those in it. He wanted to set the place ablaze" in a loving and peaceful way.

A little closer to home in Texas, Dr. Wameeth Fadhli, actually in Dickinson, took an example from our bro's in the hood and did a drive-by "random" shooting of a bicyclist; while in Baltimore, Mujtaba Rabbani Jabbar, who in the name of the Religion of Peace shot and killed a Jewish customer at a movie palace. And finally, in the liberal home of bad coffee, Seattle, frustrated islamic facist auto terrorist Naveed Haq went on a shooting spree at the Jewish Federation killing at least one person.

UH, don't say I didn't warn you. Campus liberalism is no protection against frustrated islamo facist auto terrorist. In fact, if the islamo facist ever gain power in US government, liberals will be the first to be exterminated just as the Jews were under Hitler in WWII.

Hattip to Debbie Schlussel.

Screw the libs!

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?