- WARNING TIGHT-ASSED LIBS: IF YOU CAN'T TAKE A JOKE, DON'T READ THIS BLOG!
- JOHN F. KERRY'S COMMENTS REFLECT WHAT THE DEMOCRATS TRULY THINK ABOUT OUR TROOPS
- WE ARE "pro-America" "pro-Wal-Mart" & "pro-Israel" BLOGGERS
- HOW MANY DAYS UNTIL THE LIBERAL MEDIA REPORTS ON LIBERAL SENATOR "DINGY" HARRY REID AND HIS LAND SCANDAL AND ILLEGAL USE OF CAMPAIGN FUNDS?
Thursday, August 24, 2006
Al-UH Daily Cougar Columnist David McLard 'It's OK to Search Airline Passengers' (As long as terrorists aren't offended)
Well he is -- until a potential terrorist gets offended.
McClard relays how we have all heard of the new stepped up security measures due to "foiled terrorist plot in Britain," and how "cookies and ballpoint pens" are being confiscated, "babies being frisked and Bibles being forced into overstuffed luggage."
Those measures may sound extreme, but hell we are at war. At war with peaceful religious people who just want to kill all US infidel's -- liberals included.
McClard chides President Bush for taking "credit for stymieing potential harm to our nation," while praising al-Qaeda as "an enemy that thinks in terms of decades," knowing full well that American liberals want the public to forget 9/11 and get back to a pre-9/11 mentality, so that liberals can retake the House and Senate in the November elections.
McClard quotes author Ron Suskind, who is no friend of the White House, as saying we must not compromises on "those things that make us distinctive as a democracy and distinctive in terms of the long human pageant." In other words, no racial profiling. As for McClard, terrorists must be given an equal opportunity in America to strike against us at any time or place that they wish. It is after all -- the liberal (or progressive) thing to do.
McClard continues that "Homeland Security Chairman Peter King said airport screeners should put political correctness aside and investigate all Middle Eastern and South Asian people outright. He said they were consistently the ones who hijacked planes, so they should be singled out."
Of course McClard violently objects, stating "this flies in the face of the pillars of our society: freedom, equality and legitimate law enforcement," and is against the objective of the American Left to a pre-9/11 mentality and allow our country to be further invaded by these non-infedels.
I'm sorry David Lee, what would you rather have -- downtown Houston and UH unihabital for years because of a dirty nuclear bomb, or some "foreigners with dark skin" profiled. Look Israel's El Al Airline has been profiling for years and they have yet to have an incident.
Profiling is a sad fact, but it must be done. It must be done for the survival of our children, and our country. All this politically correct BS is flying in the face of reality, and we will sooner or later be burned, and be burned bad. Hell, I'm still amazed we are still letting muslims into this country. It is a price that Europe is now paying, and sooner or later, we will have to step up to the checkout counter.
Muslims are unyielding in their religion, and if they hate us so, why do they even come here. On top of that, liberals clamp on to islam as a religious savior when they disregard Christianity as worthless. I thought liberals considered all religion worthless, except the church of liberalism itself.
McClard dream of "offense proof" screening measure such as walk-through X-ray machines a long off, and utopian ideas "hygienic cavity searches" by physicians on-hand and that "convenient searches would take place in curtained cubicles much like the ones already used at airports but would be more spacious" are long off or may never materialize. That's liberal thinking for you.
Incredibly, David Lee McClard oozes his liberal thoughts when he writes "the greatest threat to any flight is the very consciousness of a would-be terrorist. Acting on this core threat, security officials should put in place a comprehensive sedation measure to ensure that, even granted boarding, a would-be terrorist would not be conscious for the flight itself." Why the hell would liberals even think of letting the "would-be terrorist" on board in the first place, much less sediating the guy.
Wouldn't that take away the "would-be terrorist" liberal civil rights? After all it "flies in the face of the pillars of our society: freedom, equality and legitimate law enforcement?"
Screw the libs!
Technically, it's sarcasm.
Links to this post: