.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}
EIB Bumpersticker

Wednesday, May 31, 2006

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'Liberals salivating over alleged US involved Iraqi Killings' (Will try to compare to Vietnam's My Lai Massacre)

When liberals woke today they woke to joyful headlines of allegations that US Marines had massacred unarmed Iraqi civilians in the western city of Haditha late last year.

Rep. John Murtha, a liberal who hates the military, said "Marines shot and killed unarmed civilians in a taxi at the scene and went into two homes and shot others." Murtha, who is not a Marine, said this with the anticipation that it will bring back the memories of the My Lai Massacre, which was a massacre committed by U.S. soldiers in Vietnam on March 16, 1968. My Lai reduced support for Vietnam and gave the liberals of the 1960s an American military lose which they so craved back then.

No, if the liberal Iraq massacre holds true they will be out in force during the summer comparing My Lai to Haditha. Liberals don't really care who was killed, or who really did it, they just care that Americans are being blamed.

Even if the killings are deemed unprovoked, then they will be dealt with. The libs will help al-Qaeda with their news reports and outrage, and of course the United States. Liberals do not praise the troops, that can be felt in liberal speeches about the troops as compared to anti-Bush statements. The libs are not pro-military, never have been.

The Marine investigation is expected to be completed some time in June to see if the UCMJ was violated.

Screw the libs!

Tuesday, May 30, 2006

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'After Years of Crucifying Religious People' (Liberals now turning to the Religious Voters for support)

You know that liberals must be in trouble when "Howard Dean says democrats must have faith in their ability to attract religious voters." Dean is expected to announce his "born again" strategy at the upcoming Oregon Democratic Convention that calls for "winning the support of evangelical Christians," Christians who have typically voted Republican to the same percentages of Blacks voting for the liberals.

Now that Blacks are being put aside for illegal immigrants, which is not a done deal, liberals are looking to diversify their ranks even further with their planned addition of evangelicals right next to gay loving or environmentalist wacko liberals who have a seething hate for all things religious.

Thank God it will never work. Liberals like Howard Dean would have to juggle so many things they would never have their cards straight. In fact, following a Dean appearance on Pat Robertson's 700 Club he had to later apologize to gay-rights leaders for stating during the democrats party platform supported marriage between a man and a woman.

Dean is still looking for more appearances on religious television, which will undoubtedly end in more apologies to gay groups. Hell, the guy still can't come up with the liberals values, stating "our democratic values are American values," which is a definite cop out.

Oregon, probably the state that hates religion the most, behind New York, California, and Illinois, is a great testing ground for the liberals and their religious experiment. In fact, the Oregon convention is going to have a half-day religious outreach training session for liberals to warm up to the idea. No word if the libs will say the "Hell Mary" ten times to ask for forgiveness for their sins.

I'm pretty sure that all members of the GOP should be safe in saying that their Evangelical base is safe and that they have no fear of liberals stealing them, unless the slithering libs offer them an apple they can't refuse.

Ain't gonna happen.

Screw the libs!


Monday, May 22, 2006

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'Keller ISD Elementary School' (Liberals teaching our kids bad values)

Keller ISD's Liberty Elementary is so afraid of offending even the smallest number of people that they withheld the words "In God We Trust" from the cover of the school yearbook.

The annual depicts the 2005 Liberty Nickel with the of Thomas Jefferson, and the words which are to the left are convienently missing.

To make up for the missing needed words, the liberals at Liberty Elementary who planned the $16 yearbook decided to include a sticker (the picture to the right) with the credo and directions on how to apply it to the cover if the owner chooses.

Liberals are so stupid. Only a few people might have been offended about this, and God forbid, this country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles, but instead of offending only one or two people, the libs there decided to offend everyone. And now they are the toast of the Dallas and Texas news with their embarrassment.

Screw the libs!

Friday, May 19, 2006

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'Senate Committee Approves Gay Marriage Ban Amendment' (NOW and other liberals to have 'shit fit')

NOW sent out an e-mail tonite that condemned a Senate Committee's Vote approving the Federal Marriage Amendment, or a federal gay marriage ban.

Hooorraaay!!! NOW President Kim Gandy is pissed.

I don't care about the party line vote, I'm just glad the GOP Senate is starting to piss off more liberals. This should hopefully be in the news in the morning. Hell, hopefully they might go for broke and put in a full abortion ban as well.

The liberals called the vote "marriage discrimination" of all things, but thankfully the amendment will now be sent to the Senate floor for a full vote.

Gay marriage has to go down. If not, when will it stop, when old men and young boys are being discriminated against because they want to marry.

Thank God for George W. Bush and the Republican leadership for supporting a Constitutional amendment to guarantee the end to gay marriage, and giving hope to millions of loving heterosexual couples into maintain the Republican majority in November.

Liberals are trying to say that the Federal Marriage Amendment will harm all families which is bullcrap. Gay marriage is a result of liberalism gone array.

Yes the Constitution protects the rights of all people, but those deviants who choose to be different cannot and will not be allowed to destroy the traditional marriage values our country holds.

In all this turmoil, NOW, in their e-mail turned to Sen. Edward "Ted The Swimmer" Kennedy (D-Mass.), probably the one guy in the U.S. Senate who holds the least respect for women, having killed one, and The Swimmer said "a vote for this amendment is a vote for bigotry -- pure and simple." Kennedy did go on with his tripe, but it was obvious that he supported a reverse bigotry that in itself is "pure and simple," a.k.a. - traditional marriage.

NOW questioned the Committee's secrecy, that there was no cameras, no press, and no public scrutiny -- BRILLIANT. It's kind of like a liberal meeting of the minds trying to find out what they stand for, since we still don't know.

The Federal Marriage Amendment is not discriminatory, nor is it cruel, nor is it contrary to the fundamental guarantees of the Constitution. It just makes sense.


Screw the libs!

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'The USA Today on Bill Cosby' (Places Black communities faults not on Whites, but Blacks)

I respect Bill Cosby. He spanks the Black community in his speeches to wake them up. He says what needs to be said, and speaks frankly like very few other Black speakers.

Besides J.C. Watts, and a very select few other Black men in America, Cosby is one of the most common sense Black men in the United States.

USA Today noted some of his excerpts from his May 17, 2004, speech at the NAACP gala commemorating the 50th anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education today.

On poor people:

"The lower economic and lower middle economic people are not holding their end in this deal. In the neighborhood that most of us grew up in, parenting is not going on. ... I'm talking about people who cry when their son is standing there in an orange suit. Where were you when he was 2? Where were you when he was 12? And where were you when he was 18, and how come you don't know he had a pistol?"

On illiteracy:


"Brown v. Board of Education is no longer the white person's problem. We've got to take the neighborhood back. We've got to go in there. Just forget telling your child to go to the Peace Corps. It's right around the corner. It can't speak English. It doesn't want to speak English. I can't even talk the way these people talk. "Why you ain't where you is go, ra." ... Everybody knows how important it is to speak English except these knuckleheads. You can't land a plane with 'Why you ain't ...' You can't be a doctor with that kind of crap coming out of your mouth."

On who's to blame:


"We cannot blame white people. White people don't live over there. ... It's not what they're doing to us. It's what we are not doing. Fifty percent dropout. Look, we're raising our own ingrown immigrants. These people are fighting hard to be ignorant. ... They're angry and they have pistols and they shoot and they do stupid things."

On black women:

"Five and six different children - same woman, eight, 10 different husbands or whatever. Pretty soon you're going to have to have DNA cards so you can tell who you're making love to."


On teen sex:


"What is it with young girls getting after some girl who wants to still remain a virgin? Who are these sick black people and where did they come from? And why haven't they been parented to shut up? ...This is a sickness, ladies and gentlemen, and we are not paying attention to these children. These are children. They don't know anything. They don't have anything."


On Brown's impact:

"Basketball players - multimillionaires - can't write a paragraph. Football players - multimillionaires - can't read. Yes, multimillionaires. Well, Brown v. Board of Education, where are we today? It's there. They paved the way. What did we do with it? The white man, he's laughing — got to be laughing. Fifty percent dropout rate, rest of them in prison."


On taking responsibility:

"The church is only open on Sunday. And you can't keep asking Jesus to do things for you. You can't keep asking that God will find a way. God is tired of you. God was there when they won all those (court) cases. ... That's where God was, because these people were doing something. ... When you go to church, look at the stained-glass things of Jesus. Look at them. Is Jesus smiling? Not in one picture. ... So tell your friends. Let's try to do something. Let's try to make Jesus smile. Let's start parenting."

=======================================================

Blacks are free people, but it is the Civil Rights leaders that purposely keep successful Blacks like Secretary Rice, Justice Thomas, and Secretary Powell from being seen as role models.

Instead, people who make it to the NBA are seen as role models no matter how much trouble they get in, and whether they are illiterate or not.

Screw the libs!

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'UN Violations Are Serious' (Yet the liberal media protects them with their silence)

Among the UN violations noted in Eric Shawn's book "The U.N. Exposed: How the United Nations Sabotages America's Security and Fails the World", it makes the U.S. look like a school boy as compared to corrupt United Nations which is:




On all of this stuff the liberal media has refused to really investigate this stuff, while at the same time trying to make the United States look like the world's most terrible felon.

Liberals can never find fault in communism, communist leaders, or the United Nations, when all three are corrupt.

Screw the libs!


Monday, May 15, 2006

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'First Lady: 'I Don't Believe George's Low Ratings' (I find her more credible that the liberal media)

This From NewsMax:

First lady Laura Bush isn't worrying much about President Bush's low poll ratings - she says they're wrong.

"I don't really believe those polls," said Bush, who added that the news media seem to have "a lot of fun" writing front-page stories when ratings are low but ignoring the numbers when they are high.

"As I travel around in the United States, I see a lot of appreciation for him. A lot of people come up to me and say, 'Stay the course,'" she said on "Fox News Sunday."


=======================================================

I've always said that the poll numbers are skewed dependent on the questions being asked. Just as Clinton's poll numbers were artifically high during his administration, even during Impeachment, the tables are being artifically being turned on Bush. The truth will come out many years from now, and that's fine by me, since the liberal spin can't last that long.

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'The Immigration Issue Creating More Black Republicans' (Liberals to call the Blacks Sellouts)

The Washington Times is reporting that Black Americans are participating in the protest along the border and are "joining Minuteman militia groups opposed to illegal Hispanic aliens working in the United States, saying they take jobs from blacks and piggyback off the strides made during the civil rights movement."

Blacks are becoming more offended at the liberals attempt to equate the immigration issue with black civil rights, which are two entirely seperate issues. Any Black American with two eyes can see that illegal immigration is slowly going to make them a third class citizen.

Without a doubt, the democrats and the liberals are slowly selling out the Black community for future Hispanic votes. The only problem is that less than half of the Hispanics that are in this country can vote. Of that less than half, count out the children, and the people who will not vote, and probably the most votes you can get out of the new Hispanic community can be less than one million.

Knowledgable Blacks, free from the influence of the NAACP and black leaders like the Revs. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are starting to be known as the ones who are "leading blacks in a circle." Mr. Ted Hayes, a member of the Minutemen has predicted their imminent overthrow, and uttered the quote.

Hayes, a black Los Angeles-based homeless activist and founder of the Crispus Attucks Brigade of the Minutemen, is fighting to keep the Black community vibrant, and free from the influence of immigrant rights groups, who want "to link their movement to that of black civil rights."

Mr. Hayes believes that the "civil rights movement was made by black citizens of this country, but [illegal aliens] are claiming civil rights as a key to cross the American border illegally," and he couldn't be more right. Blacks are losing jobs because illegal aliens are accepting "slave wages."

Blacks are worried about "illegal aliens' 'flooding' historically black neighborhoods without assimilating and taking advantage of overburdened government resources such as public education and health care." The key really is assimilation. The Irish did it, the Eastern Europeans did it, the Chinese did it, even the older Hispanic generations in America did it.

We used to be a melting pot society. As late as the seventies, before the sixties liberals took over, immigrants simply added their ethnicity to America. Immigrants came here to "become American," and to speak English. Now the oath of citizenship is given in their old home language, which in itself is a crime.

"About half of blacks [] see immigrants as a burden because they take jobs and housing," Immigration has gotten to the point that it is becoming more difficult for Blacks to find a job, and that a growing number of their relatives have recently lost employment to illegal aliens, and they feel that the "American dream is becoming the American nightmare."

It is time to close the border. Better yet, have a reciprocal agreement with Mexico's Southen border, which would immediately stop illegal immigration by posting more men on the border.

First things first. Illegal immigration must stop. Keep them from coming in. Take it seriously. The one who takes the action will be heralded as great. We can only allow so much illegal immigration before it truely overwhelms us.

Screw the libs!

Friday, May 12, 2006

 

A Few Random Thoughts - XXXIV

- Internal al-Qaeda documents show that they are losing the war on terror. But of course you won't see that in the liberal media.

- Black Conservatives are never celebrated for their diversity. Ask "People for the American Way".

- The Civil Rights Movement has been wandering in the desert for over forty years. Moses would have been done by now.

- Bad news for liberals -- national healthcare in Canada and the UK is dying.

- Liberals never cry about Google handing over millions of internet search records to the Chinese government, but if the U.S. government trys to make connections to al-Qaeda in U.S. phone calls, then the libs go crazy.

- Libs never have a bad things to say about communism or their idols, communist leaders.

- Liberals hate reality. Tax cuts favor the economy and jobs; not the rich.

- Brazil became energy indepedent when they sunk a giant well off their own shore. Not only by sugar ethanol alone.

- Liberal pussies think about power and how they are going to take it back with their lies. They never think about for the good of the country or all things -- sacrificing for their country.

- It is physically impossible for liberals to listen in on each and every conversation made on a daily basis, and is an example of liberals investing in the defeat of America.

Thursday, May 11, 2006

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'NSA Story a Big Lie on Liberals Part' (Bush has done no wrong; conversations do remain private)

Big Brother is not listening to our conversations as liberals would want you to believe.

Aunt Sally's cookie receipe is safe -- the government does not know it. Conversations between fags on what bottles they are going to use on each other when they get together will not be noted by President Bush. And conversations between drug dealers on when the next buy goes down will remain a secret.

Liberals are crazy. They don't cry when Google let's the Chicoms have tons of internet search records. But when our government at war tries to stop known terrorist, democrats go crazy.

Frankly, democrats want to protect terrorist. They in no way want get the upper hand on the terrorist, only to get their power back. The President's statement today was right on, and in no way offends any American going about their daily business.

In a time when we were not at war, during the Clinton Administration it was common knowledge that domestic activities were underway, and not one liberal raised a stink. Clinton read FBI files, and liberals didn't care. Clinton actually listened to personal conversations of ordinary Americans, and again liberals didn't care.

Fast forward to a time of war. A time when liberals absolutely hate the President and want him gone even if it lays waste to our country. Any move that the President makes is hounded and is always wrong.

The same liberals who hound President Bush for doing something in the War on Terror, would be the same liberals who would claim that he did nothing if we were hit again. So Bush can't win with the liberals, and he goes about his daily business anyway.

USA Today held this story, and whoever leaked this information should be arrested. Liberals and our liberal media are aiding the terrorists.

I've gotten to the point that I'm starting to look forward to the day when liberals, especially influential liberals, start winding up dead in back alleys for selling out America and helping our enemies.

It's time for the Conservative Mafia to rise up. Since liberals don't believe in guns, it will be a turkey shoot.

And finally, get this. In order to complain against the USA Today, you have to give them more private information, include DOB and address. That is more information than the government is collecting in the first place.

Screw the libs!

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'Thanks To Liberalism U.S. Infant Mortality Rates on Rise' (US Blacks fair worst with most dead per 1000 live births)

Here is something you won't see on WIN or in the Daily Cougar, the Houston Chronicle reported that U.S. Blacks are driving up infant mortality rates, thus bringing the US rate closer to that of developing nations rather than that of the industrialized world.

I guess the Culture of Death impression that the liberals are leaving on young Black youth is really hitting its mark. "Among U.S. blacks, there are 9 deaths per 1,000 live births," making the US infant mortality rate of 5 deaths per 1,000 live births on par with the likes of Hungary, Malta, Poland and Slovakia.

Of course, when you have a liberal culture that has to post a sign of "NO BABIES" on dumpsters in rundown areas, what do you expect. Hell even, Japan's rate, which was 1.8 would spike if even a small percentage of American Fourth Warders would all of a sudden up and move to Japan.

The experts are trying to blame this on America not spending enough money on getting health care to the poorer communities. Bull crap. The poor know where to go to get medical attention. That is not the excuse. It's Hollywood liberalism and video games, and the general lack of respect for Black human life that are driving the numbers higher.

This is about instilling liberal victimhood in an entire race of Black Americans that offers virtually no hope in their poor people except for a few lucky extraordinary athletes that make millions upon millions yet offer nothing back to the community, their race baiting religious and civil rights leaders that in order to remain in power have to keep the people in intellectual bondage, and Black liberal politicians that keep getting elected to Congress who only offer government assistance with no regards to improving their constituencies self esteem.

The Chronicle article "U.S. infant mortality rate ranks poorly" held the reason for the spike in the U.S. infant mortality rate until well in the middle of the article. They had to lie, instead of exposing the Black culture of death mindset, they blamed White because of "racial and income health care disparities." Again, BS.

I'm really not surprised about the U.S. Black mortality rates. This is not about medical care, its about the regard for human life, and quite frankly with B-Stupid popping caps all over the place, the Black community is going to become desensitized to human life and just fend for themselves.

Black teenage girls have no time to raise a baby. When you live for the moment, you have no time to take responsibility for your actions, if you happen to get pregnant, and avoid counseling and their parents detection, a dumpster or toilet is where the off-spring is likely to go, and the ones that are found are lucky as compared to untold percentages that are rotting in our landfills today.

Following Japan's 1.8, the Czech Republic, Finland, Iceland and Norway came in with 2 per 1,000.

Not surprisingly, Africa faired the worst with 65 out of 1,000 live births. Incredibly, Liberia, a nation of freed American slaves, ranked the worst among the African nations.

I'm not being racist in writing this, I'm simply telling what needs to be told. Nobody ever tells the Black community to ever look to the future and not to the past. They always look to bad things that happened to them, and celebrate them and use that for their greed. They never say "you can get out of the grips of poverty by working hard, and believing in yourself." At least I haven't heard it as one voice coming out of the civil rights leaders and Black congressional members.

Excuses such as national health insurance and short maternity leaves prove unworthy. If a pregnant woman asks for prenatal medical care in this country she is going to get it. If she goes to the food pantry or a church, she is going to get free food. No, the mindset is set that those who get pregnant don't care for themselves in their first place, and the fetus suffers with the premature births and low birth weight and eventual death or being allowed to die in a dumpster.

Screw the libs!

Wednesday, May 10, 2006

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'Liberal Houston Chronicle loses 3.6% more circulation' (Expect more Black/Hispanic layoffs; white liberals to keep jobs)

Our good friends over at Blog Houston are reporting the Newspaper Association of America's new circulation numbers on the failing newspapers across the country. Of course the NAA won't post the percentages, but just doing a little backtracking and mathematics can handle that.

Thankfully, the San Fransisco Chronicle lost another 15% or 16%, and they are talking layoffs and early retirements in their Opinion section, and as with Houston, the Black, Hispanic, and probably even Asian workers who handle the papers will soon experience layoffs as well. But it won't affect their liberal journalism, which will surely bring on another round of 15% loses in the next rating period.

The chief liberals at the Houston Chronicle building which have tried to move the slightest move to the right, still had another episode of Chronarrhea and felt the sting of a 3.6% drop in their circulation.

The liberals at the Chronicle still believe its Houstonians that are stupid and not their stinking journalism at the HC. Their efforts to revamp have failed, less people are subscribing to the Chronicle but who is to suffer -- the Blacks and Hispanics of course, and not the white liberals on the top floor who never ask the questions of themselves "what's wrong with us in not meeting the needs of a Houston readership."

With the Chronicle down to a circulation of 513,387, we can expect more Chronicle dumping in the future, but when will the next round of minority layoffs be annouced?

I have refused to subscribe to the Chronicle for years now, and when they do call I always say, "sorry, I don't need anymore paper for my birdcage" or something to that effect. The loss of another ten thousand or so readers to the average weekday circulation of the Chronicle cements their future. The question is how much longer can they afford to be liberally biased, when they break into the 350's?

We can all be assured that if a paper changes it attitude they can gain readership, but as for the Chronicle's sake, in another 6 months there will be another post on the Chronicle losing another big chunk of its readership and its circulation dipping under 500,000.

Screw the libs!

Tuesday, May 09, 2006

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'NOW puts out APB E-Mail to Save ABC's Commander in Chief' (A Hillary run for President is really in trouble)

The following desperate NOW e-mail sent a few minutes ago is so hillarious I'm just going to post it word for word.

============================================================

Will ABC's "Commander in Chief" Be Cancelled? Fight Back

The first woman to be president of the United States is about to get the boot.


It was almost too good to be true: Geena Davis as the first woman president of the United States! Donald Sutherland as the evil Speaker of the House!


Great cast. Decent time slot. Women all over the country planned their Tuesday nights around the show, rounding up their daughters to eat popcorn, critique and bask in wish-fulfillment glow.


Was it too good to last? Not if you take action NOW.


Although critically acclaimed for fast-paced writing and superb acting by a cast of real honest-to-goodness movie stars, "Commander in Chief" suddenly went on hiatus. And now, after only two return episodes in a new time slot on a different night (and incidentally, opposite blockbuster "ER"), it's being cancelled.

But it's not too late. Let the network hear from you.
  • Call ABC Primetime Entertainment President Steve McPherson at 818-460-0000 today and let him know that you want ABC to give "Commander in Chief" a fair shake.
  • If you prefer, you can go to the ABC website where you can input your name and address, select "Commander in Chief" from the drop-down menu of programming and leave a simple message of support for the show, such as: Please bring back "Commander in Chief."

The show has hardly been given time to develop an audience. Some of the best shows on television have taken - and been allowed by the networks - time to grow a dedicated group of viewers. Witness the long-running hit "NYPD Blue." "Commander in Chief's" sudden disappearance and rescheduling was a recipe for failure.

When I watched the first episode, I held my breath, hoping that Geena Davis would be strong and realistic, not sappy, and not a caricature of what ABC/Disney thinks of a female president. And week after week, I wasn't disappointed.

Best of all, my two daughters enjoy the show as much as I do, and I know it's preparing them for the day when the first woman president walks into the real White House. We know from experience that television can lead and empower cultural change for the good, and "Commander in Chief" is a great beginning.

Is it possible that the very real chance of both political parties nominating female candidates for president in 2008 is so threatening that networks are being pressured to stop building the notion that it could be reality?

In spite of the inside politics of the TV business, a committed audience still has power with the media. An outcry from women viewers brought back "Cagney and Lacey" years ago, and revived "Judging Amy" more recently. We can do it again.

Let your voice be heard loud and clear. Call today. We've done it before and we can do it again. The message is simple: Keep "Commander in Chief" on the air.

We can do it and Si Se Puede!

Kim Gandy
NOW President

============================================================

This e-mail shows how much the liberals rely on fantasy to change the reality of public opinion. Fortunately for us, the public is not watching Commander in Chief, but instead they are watching Discovery Channel's Deadliest Catch on Tuesday night. I know watching Alaskan King and Snow Crab being caught by the Dutch Harbor fleet is much more interesting then watching a fake female President make worthless decisions and not being watched by the American public.

NOW, the people have spoken by not watching Commander, and your e-mail, like the rest of the democratic party is a joke.

Screw the libs!


 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'Liberals Arrogant Towards Winning '06 Elections' (Speaker-to-be Pelosi already choosing drapes for her office)

I recently saw Seabiscuit on cable and I couldn't help but see the correlation between Seabiscuit and War Admiral and the Republicans and the liberals in '06 and '08.

The War Admiral liberals are so confident about the '06 elections that Speaker-to-Be Nancy Pelosi is already choosing drapes for her Speakers office, and top liberals are so giddy that they can't help but call her Speaker Pelosi if only by accident, but we can't forget Seabiscuit, whom the Eastern press overwhelmingly saw as just another victory for War Admiral back in 1938.

Of course when you have the liberal press on your side, the hype can be so much that most of the country will believe that Seabiscuit will not only lose but will have War Admirals trainers picking out new drapes for War Admiral's private stable.

The numbers just don't add up for a democratic sweep in November. They can play up the "Speaker-to-Be" hype as much as they want, but when the political season heats up, liberal poll leads will drastically narrow and then they will be overcome by good 'ol Seabiscuit.

The War Admiral democrats debate over their "vision," uh pardon me, shouldn't you guys already have had vision, like more taxation, more abortion, more government control, no school choice, more activist judges, no Patriot Act, higher than we already have gas prices, cutting and running from Iraq and the War on Terror, a $9/hr minimum wage, and a general hate for the military. What more of a vision do you want. I could go on, but I have things to do.

How can the liberals actually believe they are "winners" in '06. They have no "vision," they have no idea what they stand for, Conservatives do, liberals only have gasps of air and sips of hope for '06. The liberal media that they hang with is losing circulation and viewership, and quite frankly the American people are turned off to the liberals. The liberal media will get theirs one day.

The liberals always need victims. Victims give the liberals power. Liberals cry about high gas prices, but allowing drilling in AWR and elsewhere in America, which would help their victims in the economy with lower gas prices is not allowed.

The humility of the Conservatives will allow them to prevail. We believe in God, and the greatness of America. We hold America in "awe" while liberals liberals hold our country in "contempt." America knows this, and that's why Conservatives will continue to be seen as the "bad guys," while the real bad guys such as the Kennedy's will continue to cover-up their offenses and blame it on something else, like Ambien.

Liberals, the Common Sense American knows better. That is why you won't win in '06, '08, '12, or in any other election year.

For if democrats ever win again, America will surely lose.

Screw the libs!

Monday, May 08, 2006

 

New Orleans says "Thanks Houston"

"Thanks Houston" decals are starting to show up all over New Orleans vehicles for taking the worst that the city had to offer and not give them back.

Famous gangters like NO's 'B-Stupid' who has no regard for human life, has killed over 700 people, actually its about 739, with at least 12 of those killed in the Houston area.

While New Orleans crime rate has gone down, Houston is dumbfounded trying to figure out why its murder rate has suddenly went up without trying to offended those former NO residents that kill indiscriminately and who are actually responsible for the increase.

Now that B-Stupid is out of the way, will the murder rate B-going down. B-Stupid can't be responsible for every murder and crime since the rise. So there has to be more of them out there, perhaps C-Stupid, D-Stupid, and E-Stupid.

In time the situation will right itself, but how much time. HPD has many officers ready to retire, and it the backlog for new cops taking over and getting experience can take up to five years or more.

One things for sure. I'm glad I have the capabilities to answer attempts by ?-Stupid with some of their own medicine.

Screw the libs!

Friday, May 05, 2006

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'Liberals think they are above the law with this cover-up' (Congressman Patrick Kennedy not processed for DUI)

Another Kennedy is in trouble.

This time it is Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.), son of "The Swimmer" Sen. Ted Kennedy, who was involved in a crash near the Capitol Thursday morning, in which Kennedy nearly hit a Capitol Hill police car, and smashed into a barricade.

Acting Chief Christopher McGaffin, who should be fired for not allowing Kennedy to be processed for DUI, is being asked by his union for the investigation to be completed.

Officer Greg Baird wrote that the wreck took place at approx. 2:45 a.m. yesterday, when “the driver (Kennedy) exited the vehicle and he was observed to be staggering.” Baird wrote that officers approached Kennedy who declared to them he was a "Congressman and was late to a vote." The only thing is that the House adjourned nearly three hours before the wreck.

The driver was officially identified as Congressman Patrick J. Kennedy from Rhode Island. Capitol Hill police are trained in DUI situation, but were prevented from processing the scene and from completing sobriety test at the scene. Two officers of higher rank showed up and took control of the scene. They talked it over with the commander on duty at the time, and Kennedy was escorted home without being processed.

Sources have confirmed that Kennedy was drunk and stumbling, and claiming to be late for a vote. Kennedy had been involved in an accident just two weeks ago in Rhode Island. No word if that wreck was alcohol involved.

DUI situations are no stranger to the Kennedy's. Patrick's Dad, Senator Edward Kennedy, set the standard for DUI's when he killed Mary Jo back in 1969 following a night of drinking.

Of course P. Kennedy wrote in a statement later yesterday, that "I consumed no alcohol prior to the incident. I will fully cooperate with the Capitol Police in whatever investigation they choose to undertake." So somebody is a liar, and I willing to take the word of the Capitol Hill police over The Swimmers Son.

If anything, The Watch Commander, and the two sergeants should be fired for not allowing a sobriety test to be performed.


Don't tell the people over at the Hawk & Dove about Pat's drinking the night before, but the New York Times and CNN spent more time trying to explain Kennedy's elaborate excuse that he was taking Ambien and other medication than in actually explaining what went on, so you can see the liberal coverup already, which is probably more than enough to get him off the hook seeing as liberals never find any fault in dictators, communist leaders, and white liberal politicians (Cynthia McKinney and William Jefferson not included).

Screw the libs!

Thursday, May 04, 2006

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'Liberals turn their backs on the real torture going on out there'

The Executive Director of the American Communist League Union Anthony D. Romero recently sent out an e-mail that "Torture is un-American".

Of course Anthony and the liberals can believe that as long as they ignore the picture on the right of an American head after being beheaded.

Liberals forget that September 11th happened everyday in order to believe what they believe. Quite frankly, the liberals trash our beliefs in favor of a religion that would have most of them put to death if they were to live under the influence of Islam.

Besides a few pictures by some stupid soldiers, liberals have not found any abuse at Club Gitmo, only well treated detainees whose Korans have never been abused.

Romero is desperate to add names, dead or alive to his petition. He will meet with the Committee Against Torture in Geneva, and you can be damn sure that no pictures of al-Qaeda holding severed American heads will be around, but plenty of Abu Ghraib pictures will be on the walls.

Romero's e-mail was a bunch of lies, talking of "illegal spying on innocent Americans, gag orders used to silence political debate, warrantless searches," and goes to show his desperation in getting donations to his organization.

Romero never holds President Clinton accountable for the FBI files in the White House, the actual wiretapping of Bill's political enemies, and other miscarriages of justice. Stuff that he alleges that Bush has done, but where was the ACLU during Clinton?

Screw the libs!

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'ABC's Commander in Chief and NBC's West Wing have been impeached' (Where are liberals turning for liberal WH TV?)

The show that was said to be the predecessor to a Hillary Clinton Administration has been cancelled, or impeached, after only 14 episodes. Yes, Commander in Chief and its female President has bored America to the point that now both liberal White House shows, the other West Wing, are on the way out. The West Wing has about ten more days left in its administration.

Liberals will now have to flock to Wal-Mart to get DVDs of past seasons of the West Wing, and the only part season of Commander in Chief to ensure they have a fantasy world of a liberal White House in their lives. Of course, liberals will also have a choice of Hollywood Presidential movies to choose, none that really represented a true Clinton Administration.

I rarely watched West Wing and never watched Commander in Chief, but if they would have tried a Conservative administration, one of those shows might still have some seasons in front of them.

Screw the libs!

Wednesday, May 03, 2006

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'NOW calls for raise in Minimum Wage' (Liberals really to blame for creating dependency class of people)

NOW is urging "let Congress hear from you -- support raising the minimum wage to $7.25 an hour by 2008."

So what the minimum wage hasn't been raised in nearly a decade. After ten years, shouldn't a struggling family have improved themselves enough to become unstruggling. Unless that family was continually being bombarded with thoughts that they couldn't do it without the liberals, and the Jessie Jackson's of the world. Thankfully Larry X and many other former liberals are not heeding their call anymore.

NOW happily reports that of the "7.3 million workers currently earning the federal minimum wage of $5.15 per hour, 61% are women and 72% are breadwinning adults, not teenagers in their first after-school job."

NOW will never look at the cause of why so main breadwinners are on minimum wage. There are many reasons why people are on minimum wage: bad schools that offered no hope, no encouragement for success in the liberal community, liberals always looking for the victim to be dependent on them, liberals handing out freebees with no incentive to ever work.

I don't think that the minimum wage was ever designed to be a "living wage." One would naturally expect that after a while that person would get raises or dare I say, even get "promotions" in improving their lot in life.

Yes, liberals will never yell out to workers "work hard so you can get out of your minimum wage situation." Instead we get "let Congress hear from you -- support raising the minimum wage to $7.25."

Liberals have about as much respect for the American Worker as they do the American Soldier. They don't want to see either succeed. Hence the liberals calls to surrender to the terrorists, as well as for an increased minimum wage.

Those in the know know that any attempt to raise the minimum wage is tied to union wages. And I also have a great question, if $5.15 per hour is such a bad minimum wage, what good will $7.25 do for a breadwinner. I've always maintained a family needs over $21 per hour to at least make a dent into maintaining a decent household.

So why not a $21 per hour minimum wage. Because the liberals would have no victims, and many people are not worth $21 per hour. Not to mention that many businesses would cease to exist.

I don't know if a minimum wage is a good thing or bad thing, but it always is going to be around, and liberals will be clamoring for a higher minimum wage thirty years from now, just as they are crying for one today. What can change is liberals actually giving hope in their constituents well being. Give them hope that they can achieve not only for themselves but for their families sake.

Yep, liberals and the instilling of hope. Reminds me of lipstick on a pig -- it just doesn't work.


Tuesday, May 02, 2006

 

WIN Article on VA 'They try hard to find controversy' (Not enough effort on focusing on the good that the VA does for Houston area Vets)

In the recent WIN article Opinions Vary on VA Funding, I was glad that they focused on the VA, and would have hoped that they would have stayed more on the positive than the negative.

The VA Medical Center here in Houston, named after the famous doctor Michael E. Debakey, is probably one of the best hospitals in the country. The technology is top notch, the people are trained by the best, and they even have valet parking.

The VA will always be up against budget cuts, that is the game they must play. And even though their patient care needs have risen, they are handling the pressure just fine. I had accompanied a Uncle of mine to the VA emergency room this past weekend, and their is no other place in Houston, you can be seen by a doctor, treated, and released faster than at the VA.

No matter the VA's budget, they are going to do what they have to do when it comes to patient care. Yes, some veterans may temporarily be left out of the system, but they will get in one day. Yes, it may take some time to see the doctor you need to see, and yes, co-pays for prescriptions may be going up, but is that not the case for everyone.

WIN didn't have to concentrate on the VA Medical Center in Washington in telling bad things about the VA, when they have a VA Medical Center less than five miles from the WIN studios. But in Houston, there are a lot of good things going on that would have made WINs report have too much good news.

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'What should the US role in the Sudan be?' (The same role as the Clinton Administration took in regards to Rwanda - zip)

For those libs clamoring for the troops to get out of Iraq only to go save those doomed in the Sudan. Forget it.

Clinton wouldn't even allow private military corporations (PMCs) to stop the genocide in Rwanda, because it didn't sit well with his liberal polling groups, so the doomed in Sudan as far as I'm concerned are on their own.

PMCs, were a great idea. A company of 100 men could literally control a country, they spread that much fear, and they were the good guys. I can't remember the country, but a South African PMC stopped a civil war in one country in Africa, then a UN force of 18,000 went in and since the guerillas had no respect for the UN, the civil war erupted again. PMCs are that good.

The only way to save the innocent in Sudan is to hire a defunct PMC, let them be ruthless to the evildoers in the Sudan, and keep the UN and US out of the way. US liberals would never let US troops in Africa again anyway. Better yet, the UN could issue a resolution for the bad guys in the Sudan to just -- stop. Good luck, seeing as a UN resolution isn't worth the paper its written on.

The US wimp leadership in the waning days of Somalia, gave rise to the butchery in Rwanda and now the Sudan, not to mention OBL himself.

As far as President Bush is concerned, liberals will damn him for going into Africa, then again, they are going to damn him for not going to Africa. I say don't go, and save yourself from being damn twice by the liberals Mr. President.

Screw the libs!

Monday, May 01, 2006

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'NOW claims 350,000 showed for March for Peace, Justice & Democracy' (Some numbers as low as 25,000)

Just to show how much respect NOW holds for its members, Mai Shiozaki send out an e-mail stating that 350,000 people showed for that wacked out event, when other estimates figures in the low thirties of thousands, and some even say 25,000.

The New York Times reported numbers in the tens of thousands, with no mention anywhere near hundreds of thousands, seeing as the illegals can put up the anti-war libs numbers in their sleep.

Screw the libs!

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?