.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}
EIB Bumpersticker

Tuesday, May 31, 2005

 

'Drive By Thanking' of Veterans (Liberals will never be honored for their disservice to their country)

I was driving south on Hwy 288 today around 4:30 PM minding my own business and listening to Dan Patrick on KSEV when this gray haired man in a blue Chevy truck, literally honked his horn and got my attention.

The man motioned me to roll down my window of which I did. I did not know what to expect. The man had noticed the license plates on my truck which noted my wartime sacrifice and thanked me yelling (since we were both moving at 60 mph) for my service to our country in a time of war.

This was not the first time this has happened to me, and as usual, I was humbled and honored. I saluted the man, he saluted back going and went about his way, and like that the "drive by thanking" was over.

I remember a couple of years ago in my car, one of my nephews reported to me "Hey Uncle B**, someone just saluted us," to which I said, "did you salute 'em back." Everyone in the car knew what was going on, and nothing had to be said. I routinely get recognized throughout the year in one or the other of my vehicles with greater spurts near holidays honoring veterans.

I literally get goose bumps everytime this happens. I truly do not want the recognition, but it comes and I accept it if grateful American citizens want to express their emotions verbally.

Liberals will never get "drive by thankings" for their disservice to our country, and I would hope that any car that proclaims liberalism is jeered and snickered. Anyone who thanks someone for supporting America's enemies, the downfall of America, abortion, higher taxes, homosexuality, encouraging teen sex with no consequence, etc. deserves to be given the "drive by finger."

Screw the libs!

 

UH Daily Cougar Columnist Jim McCormick 'Hater of the religious like Carminati' (Expect summer series of tripe on stem cell research)

Today in the excuse that the University of Houston calls its daily newspaper -- the Daily Cougar, they start off Summer 2005 with the same thing -- more liberalism.

In his tripe today "Dogma severs stem cells' potential" opinion columnist Jim McCormick has "been noting a disturbing trend in the realm of national politics" -- the growth of religion, and the influence that they have against liberal causes.

McCormick announced today his summer campaign against religion and life, probably obtained when he was sexually abused by a local neighborhood teen as a boy and liked it. McCormick sticks to using embroyos to "further stem cell research" and totally ignores the promising results from adult stem cells and stems cells from the umbilical cord.

McCormick assumes "most people, even abortion opponents, are generally in favor of" embryos being "destroyed under current policies, which is basically wasting human life," but with the way the liberal media poses questions, they can spin the 1940s holocaust against the Jews as a good thing as so goes with the liberal media.

McCormick believes like any liberal "these embryos will never become people." He won't tell you about the unpromising research of embroyos. He doesn't even consider them life. Oh yes, we will go to the end of the Earth to search for some microbe from Mars and call than life, but when it comes to an embroyo, liberals just want to use that as a outlet for their bad behavior.

McCormick loves to destroy life -- the thing he calls "a clump of cells." McCormick is such a hateful liberal that he does refer President Bush or "43" but to as "The Shrub."

I hope that President Bush vetoes the bill "if it passes the Senate: just to piss
McCormick off. McCormick, who always supports the destruction of fetal life, counters that Conservatives when given "a chance comes to save lives from various ailments, such as diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and a host of other such conditions, they refuse to act." Well at least those people were given a chance to live McCormick, which is a hell of lot more than you would do for a fetus -- you asshole.

McCormick talks of Presidential assassination of Bush like a lot of liberals, but a martyred Bush would sink the Democratic party and their liberal principles below the waterline for many years to come.

McCormick is the liberal doom and gloomer, spreading falsities at every turn and will do so for the entire summer. He is practically assuring the curing of every disease if this research goes ahead, and he does not know a damn thing. In time, the use of stem cells other than embroyonic will come about, and we will catch up with the rest of the world as we always do.

One thing I don't get is why are the liberals supporting the use of this new technology. Liberals hate this country and want to see its downfall. This technology is moving overseas and it is hurting the economy, but instead of liberals supporting overseas companies they want the US to benefit from this new technology which destroys new life.

McCormick calls for "more money [being] spent toward rational science education in this country," but with liberals in charge of our education institutions who rate everyone on whether they get "triangles" and "squares" rather than "A's" and "B's," how do they expect us to keep up?

America is not running away from "science in fear to the waiting arms of the religious right," we are being lead to a dumbed down society that is purposely designed to be dependent on liberalism.

Screw the libs!

 

UH Liberalism Returns Today


Monday, May 30, 2005

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'Memorial Day 2005' (Liberals hiding from events honoring the fallen from the United States)

On this day of liberal mourning for the greatest heros of America, I attended the Memorial Day ceremony at the VA National Cemetery with my 13-year old nephew who has more understanding about national sacrifice than any liberal on Capital Hill or on the UH campus.

Liberals are so ashamed of America -- they hate their country.

My question is why don't they leave the United States. So far every liberal promise to leave the country has been broken. Howard Hughes kept his promise, and the Hercules flew.

I am proud of my country. Yes, we have falts, but all countries do, and since the US is the most successful country (like Tom DeLay), we get hounded. Environmentally, we are tame considering some other countries around the world. We treat our prisoners like barbie dolls as compared to those who chop the heads off our guys - yet Abu Ghrab gets the headline.

Liberals and their friends in the liberal media are thankfully losing their grip because they have aborted their base. Coupled with a more informed public due to more cable choices and the internet, liberals are like a KGB shell -- once the majority of the people (especially African Americans) know they are full of hot air, they will be hunted down like dogs.

Liberal newspapers, radio and televisions programs are dying, and I look to the day when liberalism is but a memory, just as communism was in Eastern Europe.

Friday, May 27, 2005

 

A Few Random Thoughts - XIII

- Liberals are moving from California, Oregon and all parts liberal to Texas. Hmm! Could it be they're overtaxed? Anyway, take their liberal asses back to where they came from.

- States with more taxation have two times less job growth than the few states with less taxation.

- Liberals don't believe that the poor are being hurt by high gas prices. In fact, liberals don't believe gas prices are high enough.

- Liberals want 'W' to lose at any cost, even if the US is hurt in the process by liberal friends - Al Qaeda.

- Liberals can only respond to UH Liberal Hater with "Get a Life".

- Newsweek and the UH Daily Cougar have the same mentality - they both print stuff that is totally false and gets people killed.

- Vincente Fox was wrong -- Mexican illegals do the jobs that liberals won't do.

- If there is a total disaster the fat will survive the longest.

Tuesday, May 24, 2005

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'NOW - Haters of the military' (Pissed over proposed law protecting of U.S. women in combat')

I'm confused. Liberals are notorious haters of the military, and I would expect them to praise the AP report noting the House bill that would bar women "from serving in direct ground combat roles." The bill is associated with the DoDs policy and spending plan for 2006.

I would expect that liberals such as supporters of
Forsake The Troops would be ecstatic at the Houses decision since it might limit the number of enlistments in America's armed forces.

The "No Women In Combat" Law passed the House on May 19th. As a combat vet myself, I can attest that liberal women make good combat troops. Liberal women in the armed forces are generally ugly, rarely take baths, have hairy armpits, and fit in well with battle hardened men who find liberal women unattractive which would enable them to concentrate on staying alive in a combat zone instead of being distracted by sexually appealing women.

Our mole in
NOW reports that a former Air Force Lt. Col. Karen Johnson, probably a lesbian, said the banning of liberal women would "be discriminatory, dangerous and regressive." Bullcrap.

Liberals have been crying about casualties - now the House starts to do something about it - at least for protecting the women - and
NOW complains about it for the NAGS they are.

The NAGS call the proposed law "false protectionism" which is designed to keep women from "forward areas" which puts them at risk from being "exposed to hostile fire." Look,
Time or Newsweek, or one of those liberal rags determined that men and women were "different." If liberal women want to be like men - grow penises.

Women have served with honor and distinction in all of America's wars. But they do not need to serve in combat roles unless they want to, but if they are killed - the DoD cannot be blamed, especially if those women did their jobs properly in combat.

Sunday, May 08, 2005

 

Attacking Non-UH liberalism 'CLOUT backed Friendswood candidates kick ass' (Houston Chronicle Election Central 'Missing in Action')

In taking a lesson from the UH Daily Cougar and not reporting news it does not like, the Houston Chronicle pulled its seven county 'Election Central' off the main page of its website following bad news from the Friendswood city council elections. You really have to search for it if you want to find it.

It turns out that liberal elitist candidates for Friendswood city council (those who did not support a property tax cap of 3%) LOST THEIR ASS!

Don't worry, its SOP (standard operating procedure) for communist newspapers like the Houston Chronicle and the UH Daily Cougar to do this - routinely suppressing good news for citizens and bad news for elitist liberals and politicians. The news story concentrated on liberal gains such as pay raises for city council members and increased tax rates. No mention of Friendswood in the story.

Don't take my word for it. Go onto to the Houston Commicles website and casually look and you will not see it.

Thursday, May 05, 2005

 

A Few Random Thoughts - XII

- The evening newcasts on ABC,CBS, and NBC is meant to liberalize society. It is designed to make the liberal side think they are winning when it isn't.

- Being labeled a liberal is an embarrassment to a liberal; hence to Progressive or Moderate label that they want.

- Liberal insist on parental approval for a child to get an ear or navel pierced. But its OK for their teenage kids to have invasive abortions without their permission.

- Liberals produce news with false polls that if asked with proper questions; the results would have to be suppressed.

- Liberals in Congress are rushing to amend their travel and campaign records, paying old restaurant bills, and some liberals are sharply limiting travel. Who is not doing this; because he's been doing it the whole time -- Tom DeLay.

- The Conservative leadership in Congress needs to sit down together and watch the movie Miracle, and listen to Coach Herb Brooks when he say "Screw 'em" to the commie libs. The Soviet Union is cocky in the movie, just like the liberals in Congress because they know they have the liberals in the media on their side.

- I have as much respect for liberals as I do for the islamic religion.

- With the liberals hate of the fetus and the child, shouldn't liberals have been encouraging American soldiers to burn and kill as many children and pregnant women during the Vietnam War as possible?

- Liberals do not blink often, nor do they move their forehead.

- Liberals are energicidal maniacs trying to kill any energy plan suggested.

- May 5th is a National Day of Prayer (my apologies to the liberals).

- The Democrats of today demand that Social Security be left alone, just as the Southern Know-Nothings of 1856 demanded that slavery be left alone; both will blow up in their face.

Tuesday, May 03, 2005

 

UH Daily Cougar Columnist Summer Plans 'Liberals will dance, drink, travel, protest' (Conservative will exhibit responsibility)

It's hard to believe that the UH Daily Cougar has finished it's Spring 2005 publishing run, and will begin its summer run of liberal starting Tuesday, May 31st.

In their final farewell for Spring 2005 "Summertime Rules?" we find the ideas of the UH Daily Cougar columnist and what they plan to do for the summer. Just by looking at the list of the columnists, the UH weak minded student can easily discern who's liberal, and who's the lone Conservative.

The Finals Forum on page 13 of the The Daily Cougar Finals Edition noted "the more responsible pupils (Tyler Nelson) will catch up on work and school, while the rest of us (liberals) will drink ourselves stupid in the sun."

Justin Vann had some surprising comments which made me step back from previous thoughts on his sexuality and now his politics. The flat chested Vann said of his wimpy limp wristed physique "I'm going to work out so that I can break (dent) this "weak liberal" sterotype. Hopefully with some strength he can get some confidence enough to write right of center. I was completely surprised with him mentioning his future summer liaison with the feminist Emily Kelsch, and I wonder if her "Who's who" list of grandmothers, have approved of the self described "weak liberal" as Emily's beau.


Derek Dickson is another example of living of the wealth of parents without taking your life in your own hands and working. Dickson plans to "frequent the poker tables of friends and casinos," as well as float "down the Guadalupe River with empty Lone Star cans." Ah, the life of having rich parents that will allow Dickson to "drink away his youth in bars and lose [his] hearing at concerts."

David Salinas plans on being the UH 'Jack Kerouac' of the summer, since he plans on driving "to California just to see if [his On The] Road trips are as fun as they look in the movies" and in the book. Incredibly David Salinas plans on getting a job, and finishing his tome, but once he turns 21 in June, he plans to waist away the rest of the summer getting drunk like all liberals with rich parents and little responsibility do.

James Davis plans on oozing gayness this summer. "I'll be bouncing between my ballroom dancing lessons, my internship at the local newspaper and my volunteer position helping inner-city children." Davis hopes that during his internship at the Houston Chronicle will result in a relationship with a nice but mature gay man that will assist him in a fledgling journalism career. Of course he will also "be drinking, [and] sleeping till 1 p.m. just like all the other liberals do.

Tyler Nelson of course will be the only UH Daily Cougar columnist exhibiting any responsibility. He will be working full-time this summer. Tyler's parents have money, but they insist that he pay his fair share of school and transportation expenses, and although Nelson has accumulated some debt it is very manageable. Unlike his liberal colleagues who will more than likely go bankrupt and then start charging their credit cards again. Tyler's a cool guy who has an occassional beer, but like most sensible Conservatives he knows he can get drunk, but why? Getting drunk makes no sense.

Giugi Carminati is planning a most sinister summer in working with liberal causes and formulating liberal policy planning for the future downfall of America. Carminati has no need work since she lives off the inventions of her husband, and the profits from the stolen American intelligence that her family has sold to Americas enemies. Carminati "will work with the" American Communist League Union or ACLU this summer striving for ways to help terrorists find their way into the country and wreak havoc on our soil.

Carminati also plans to "lend a hand with [the] city health policy office" to help find ways of getting condoms into the hands of middleschoolers and gradeschoolers, as well as well as working for 'intercourse rooms' at the high school level for young couples both gay and straight to have sex in during the school day. School supplied condoms will be available.

Carminati will also be working with the city to inaugurate 'youth sex seminars' for young inner-city teen girls to teach the girls ages 12 - 16 proper ways of giving oral sex to please their boyfriends who are threatening to break up with them. Carminati is an "expert on oral sex" says her sexologist and has advised Giugi to remind the girls of proper eye contact, different varieties of tongue movements, and proper gripping and maneuvering techniques of the phallus in their oral episodes.

Carminati really cares about the unfortunate and is really looking forward to a successful summer before returning to UH in the fall for law school, where she will be looking for legal ways to seek the future downfall of America.

Screw the libs!

Sunday, May 01, 2005

 

The Failure of Discovery Channel's Unsolved History

I know it has been a while since Unsolved History has been seen on the Discovery Channel. I initially believed that the show made a name for itself when they showed conclusive evidence that Australian Snowy Evans shot down the Red Barron, and it was impossible that Canadian Captain Roy Brown was unable to shoot down the German pilot at the time.

In addition, the Shoot Out at the OK Corral show that Unsolved History did was also very convincing.

When Unsolved History tackled the JFK Assassination I watched intently hoping that new evidence would be shown. Instead I believe they showed evidence of that day in Dealey Plaza that did not show a conspiracy. I've been to the plaza and studied the layout. I viewed video of a massive head shot that shows head debris heading upward at a slight angle towards the book depository and indicating a shot from ground level.

It was shortly after that show that I stopped watching, and soon after the show was totally cut off.

I believe that viewers to Unsolved History were disappointed as well, and simply stopped watching. We were expecting something like a MythBusters gelatin body to be shot instead of a melon. We were expecting them to challenge evidence such as a possible shot from the manhole cover area, which they brushed off easily. (Of course a shot looks bad from that area, the pavement is four inches higher than the mancover now than it was back in 1963). The devistating shot could have come from there since the car slowed to almost a standstill.

I bet the MythBusters could break this mystery just by building a gelatin body, and shooting it up from the disputed angles just to confirm or deny the Warren Commission.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?